DRDO and PSUs (46 Viewers)

randombully said:
Yeah, they have been developing a near hypersonic version of brahmos by modifying existing "ramjet" engine for few years now.
Click to expand...
supersonic flights had a lot of issues, first thing is they were expensive and dangerous to operate, second thing its hard to make passenger jet tier planes supersonic unless you're ok with like 70-150 passengers, commercial aviation as a whole now is more quantity based. as in how many passengers can you fit in a plane.

supersonic flights were marketed as fast transport medium for dhandos, who had to attend meeting in other countries , then internet happened , video calling became a thing, thus the appeal of being physically present became less and supersonic flights became unnecessary.
 
chnvipgz said:
That they will decide not you as per your skill level .First get a good gate score in mechanical engg then apply across dept like drdo,mdl etc
Click to expand...
i didnt mean to sound like that, i wanted to know how people are taken in it?? like in gate with your score you can apply for drdo and psu, but no info available for wdb navy

thats why i wanted to know how do they take people??
 
eastern_bhartiya said:
supersonic flights had a lot of issues, first thing is they were expensive and dangerous to operate, second thing its hard to make passenger jet tier planes supersonic unless you're ok with like 70-150 passengers, commercial aviation as a whole now is more quantity based. as in how many passengers can you fit in a plane.

supersonic flights were marketed as fast transport medium for dhandos, who had to attend meeting in other countries , then internet happened , video calling became a thing, thus the appeal of being physically present became less and supersonic flights became unnecessary.
Click to expand...

?? Galat post pe reply de diya?
 
liberalredditor said:
i didnt mean to sound like that, i wanted to know how people are taken in it?? like in gate with your score you can apply for drdo and psu, but no info available for wdb navy

thats why i wanted to know how do they take people??
Click to expand...
Mdl does design navy warships and work with war design bureau.Its like hal and war design bureau is like Ada.
For that you need to give scientist a,b,c,d exam of drdo and ada similarly for mdl for that you need masters degree means after mtech you can join as project scientist.
 
chnvipgz said:
Mdl does design navy warships and work with war design bureau.Its like hal and war design bureau is like Ada.
For that you need to give scientist a,b,c,d exam of drdo and ada similarly for mdl for that you need masters degree means after mtech you can join as project scientist.
Click to expand...
in mdl we can join after btech too right?? with mechanical or naval architecture engineering??

as for wdb - mdl and ada - hal comparison, atleast you can directly apply for ada through gate, then how do you apply for wdb??? or how does one join wdb??
 
Blood+ said:
Or just get a bunch of flying-wing UCAVs hooked up with AI-enabled autonomous navigation and targeting systems, load them up with a bunch of runway-denial and anti-radar munitions, and send them the PAF's way. That should do the trick, no??
Click to expand...
It will, but not against jets already in air.

But it will be used, along with the scenario I mentioned.

Land based, SEAD/DEAD missiles will also be used.
Technically we can deal with PAF without using IAF or aerial platforms at all if need arise, but it's much easier to do so by using IAF.
 
silentassassin265 said:
It Means we can shatter skardu air base completely at the cost of one bramshos missile (3 million = 100 shells)
Click to expand...
Can be used but warhead will be too small per shell.
Using 120/75 km range guided pinaka is better even if it's more expensive, due to bigger warhead, and is still cheaper than missiles.
 
liberalredditor said:
in mdl we can join after btech too right?? with mechanical or naval architecture engineering??

as for wdb - mdl and ada - hal comparison, atleast you can directly apply for ada through gate, then how do you apply for wdb??? or how does one join wdb??
Click to expand...
But you are seeking war ship design for that you need mtech or phd then give scientist a,b,c,d exam for specific departments as per their project requirement .
 
chnvipgz said:
But you are seeking war ship design for that you need mtech or phd then give scientist a,b,c,d exam for specific departments as per their project requirement .
Click to expand...
which exam?? like gate, ugc net or upsc which exam??? and scientist b is base position in drdo which btech people can also join ig
 
Blood+ said:
🤣🤣 With just 5 kg of explosive filler inside those potatoes??!! I think not. You'd be much better off firing 100 MLRS rockets, which should cost just about the same.
Click to expand...

While mlrs are a better option.

But even with small few kg warheads damaged caused by getting hit by 100 artillary shells, especially if fired on key areas( towers, biuldings, radars, runways) is pretty significant.
 
Blood+ said:
🤣🤣 With just 5 kg of explosive filler inside those potatoes??!! I think not. You'd be much better off firing 100 MLRS rockets, which should cost just about the same.
Click to expand...
True but rockets can be interpreted by ciws but there's no defence against shells.
In Korean border this is the biggest concern of south Korea as Seoul is near the border and north korea is investing heavily in artillery.
 
randombully said:
While mlrs are a better option.

But even with small few kg warheads damaged caused by getting hit by 100 artillary shells, especially if fired on key areas( towers, biuldings, radars, runways) is pretty significant.
Click to expand...
Then comes the production capacity, I don't think MLRS can be produced at same rate as artillery shells.
Not sure about the scale of those ramjet powered one?
 
silentassassin265 said:
Then comes the production capacity, I don't think MLRS can be produced at same rate as artillery shells.
Not sure about the scale of those ramjet powered one?
Click to expand...
From what I know, the production rate of 75-120km guided rockets should be similar or more likely higher than "ramjet artillary shells" just because of niche ( still significant)use case of ramjet shell.

My points was more about, to not scoff at that damage caused by being hit by 100 artillary shell, even if they carry small warhead.
 
liberalredditor said:
which exam?? like gate, ugc net or upsc which exam??? and scientist b is base position in drdo which btech people can also join ig
Click to expand...
Search for scientist a,b,c,d,e,f exams and selections for drdo and other science departments and their eligibility and requirement .

Many professors from iits,iisc and repute institutes also apply or govt contact them for projects.
 
silentassassin265 said:
True but rockets can be interpreted by ciws but there's no defence against shells.
In Korean border this is the biggest concern of south Korea as Seoul is near the border and north korea is investing heavily in artillery.
Click to expand...
Not really, modern missiles can easily intercept them( predictable path at mach 2-3), the problem comes with using expensive missile to intercept a realtively very cheap artillary shell

ciws are also fairly capable against artillary shells, but the rounds they have to use and in numbers they have to use are still relatively more expensive compared to the artillary shell they are intercepting.
US regularly used it's phalanx CIWS to intercept incoming artillary shells in Iraq.

Another advantage will be the sheer no. Of artillary shells fired, some can penetrate the defense.
That's what NK relies no, and what SK fears, the sheer no. Of artillary shells that will be fired on Seoul at the start of war.


But against a expensive ramjet powered shell, ciws will become cost effective.
 
Last edited:
silentassassin265 said:
Then comes the production capacity, I don't think MLRS can be produced at same rate as artillery shells.
Not sure about the scale of those ramjet powered one?
Click to expand...
Production capacity will depend on the cost, and in that regard, I don't think a guided MLRS round would be all that different than a ramjet-powered guided 155mm shell.
 
 
Last edited:
randombully said:
It will, but not against jets already in air.

But it will be used, along with the scenario I mentioned.

Land based, SEAD/DEAD missiles will also be used.
Technically we can deal with PAF without using IAF or aerial platforms at all if need arise, but it's much easier to do so by using IAF.
Click to expand...
Absolutely, and I'd argue the same for their surface fleet as well.
 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 44 (members: 12, guests: 32)

    Similar threads

    Pundit Pikachu
    DRDO VSHORAD
    Replies
    5
    Views
    1K
    Pundit Pikachu
    Pundit Pikachu

    Latest Replies

    Featured Content

    Trending Threads

    Share this Site

    Back
    Top