Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings

[Wayfarer]

so India did lose more territory in proportion to population in 1947. But I have one more question — don’t you think that a more populous Pakistan would also pose a greater military threat?

A complete population exchange with Pakistan would see India gain crores of Hindus as well. Moreover we would have no longer been hobbled by a zombie Muslim population.

 

[Ajatshatru]

A complete population exchange with Pakistan would see India gain crores of Hindus as well. Moreover we would have no longer been hobbled by a zombie Muslim population.

large Muslim population in India has, in a way, encouraged Hindus to vote collectively in support of Hindutva — something that might not have occurred if all Muslims had migrated to Pakistan.

 

[AbRaj]

large Muslim population in India has, in a way, encouraged Hindus to vote collectively in support of Hindutva — something that might not have occurred if all Muslims had migrated to Pakistan.

Strange way of looking at things. Like by killing yourself, one can feel the value of his/her life.

 

[Nutcracker]

so India did lose more territory in proportion to population in 1947. But I have one more question — don’t you think that a more populous Pakistan would also pose a greater military threat?

You want 40 Crore across the border , or 25 crore there and 15 crore saboteurs here.
Its a no brainer.

 

[Numero]

Self cleaning

 

[Ajatshatru]

Strange way of looking at things. Like by killing yourself, one can feel the value of his/her life.

Imagine if the Hindu-Muslim divide didn’t exist in India because all Muslims had migrated to Pakistan—then the ethnic, linguistic, and caste divisions would likely take center stage, which could be even worse

 

[Ajatshatru]

You want 40 Crore across the border , or 25 crore there and 15 crore saboteurs here.
Its a no brainer.

Radicalism among Indian Muslims will only strengthen Hindutva-based politics, gradually pushing India from a democracy toward a Hindu empire. If that happens, the Muslim population growth won’t matter—India will remain a Hindu empire, as it historically has been. And remember, only a Hindu empire—not a democracy—can restore the boundaries of Akhand Bharat.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

Radicalism among Indian Muslims will only strengthen Hindutva-based politics, gradually pushing India from a democracy toward a Hindu empire. If that happens, the Muslim population growth won’t matter—India will remain a Hindu empire, as it historically has been. And remember, only a Hindu empire—not a democracy—can restore the boundaries of Akhand Bharat.

how do you have a "hindu empire" with 30% muslim population?? After creating 3 pakistan one inside and 1 in east and west.

 

[Ajatshatru]

how do you have a "hindu empire" with 30% muslim population?? After creating 3 pakistan one inside and 1 in east and west.

India would have become a Hindu empire if the British hadn’t arrived, and if the country hadn’t been divided in 1947. the Congress might not have chosen to run India as a democracy—they could have governed it more like China or the Soviet Union. Jinnah understood that, despite their large numbers, Muslims were economically and politically weak, and that India would inevitably be dominated by Hindus and Sikhs. That’s why he insisted on an independent Pakistan.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

India would have become a Hindu empire if the British hadn’t arrived, and if the country hadn’t been divided in 1947.

I disagree. british gave us a golden opportunity one that may never come again to separate muslims and hindus. It is hindu/india rulers who ruined it . The terms of the partition were clear hindus in India , muslims in India. IT is the wretched traitors like Gandhi and Nehru who begged to keep muslims from leaving.

 

[Ajatshatru]

I disagree. british gave us a golden opportunity one that may never come again to separate muslims and hindus. It is hindu/india rulers who ruined it . The terms of the partition were clear hindus in India , muslims in India. IT is the wretched traitors like Gandhi and Nehru who begged to keep muslims from leaving.

A Muslim-majority region can be governed by a Hindu monarch—Kashmir, for example, was over 90% Muslim yet ruled by Hindu Dogra kings. Muslim-majority Punjab was under the Sikh Empire, and Sindh under the Marathas. A Hindu authoritarian regime wouldn’t need to rely on Muslim vote banks. China, for instance, has been reshaping the Muslim identity of Xinjiang through a slow and systematic process. By placing Muslims in re-education camps, the Chinese Communist Party is turning them into productive citizens.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

A Muslim-majority region can be governed by a Hindu monarch—Kashmir, for example, was over 90% Muslim yet ruled by Hindu Dogra kings. Muslim-majority Punjab was under the Sikh Empire, and Sindh under the Marathas. A Hindu authoritarian regime wouldn’t need to rely on Muslim vote banks. China, for instance, has been reshaping the Muslim identity of Xinjiang through a slow and systematic process. By placing Muslims in re-education camps, the Chinese Communist Party is turning them into productive citizens.

Churchill told Nehru and Gandhi why do you want to be independent you can't rule yourselves??? It seems Nehru proved him right. The marathas and sikhs were kingdoms not the pseudo secular democracy india tries to be. No comparision to China we do not have the will or the ability to sacrifice like the chinese.
Democracies suit countries with strong economies. India had almost no economy after independence.

 

[Ajatshatru]

Churchill told Nehru and Gandhi why do you want to be independent you can't rule yourselves??? It seems Nehru proved him right. The marathas and sikhs were kingdoms not the pseudo secular democracy india tries to be. No comparision to China we do not have the will or the ability to sacrifice like the chinese.
Democracies suit countries with strong economies. India had almost no economy after independence.

Why do you assume that democracy is an absolute necessity? It’s not. India could very well transition into an authoritarian regime like China—and in many ways, it is slowly moving in that direction. Over time, India may shift from a multiparty democracy to a two-party system, and eventually to a single-party rule—an empire similar to China. Only a Hindu empire would have the political will and capacity to restore the boundaries of Akhand Bharat and govern it effectively.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

Why do you assume that democracy is an absolute necessity? It’s not. India could very well transition into an authoritarian regime like China—and in many ways, it is slowly moving in that direction. Over time, India may shift from a multiparty democracy to a two-party system, and eventually to a single-party rule—an empire similar to China. Only a Hindu empire would have the political will and capacity to restore the boundaries of Akhand Bharat and govern it effectively.

Being a democracy has done nothing for India. I don't know where you thought I said it was good??
The dream of Akhand Bharat is a pipe dream. Some simple facts India does not even have access to
Central Asia or water security; 80% of the water from Indus go to Pakistan. Kashmir the state where the water originates has been held by Pakistan. Tibet is gone to China another source of India's waters. India lacks the strategic vision or will to even attempt something like that.

 

[Ajatshatru]

Being a democracy has done nothing for India. I don't know where you thought I said it was good??
The dream of Akhand Bharat is a pipe dream. Some simple facts India does not even have access to
Central Asia or water security; 80% of the water from Indus go to Pakistan. Kashmir the state where the water originates has been held by Pakistan. Tibet is gone to China another source of India's waters. India lacks the strategic vision or will to even attempt something like that.

A Hindu or Sikh minority cannot rule over a Muslim majority in a democracy, but a Hindu monarch or empire can certainly govern a Muslim-majority region. The Indian subcontinent was historically structured this way. It was only after we imposed a dysfunctional democracy upon ourselves that Muslims gained political power through voting. The genocide of Hindus in Kashmir might not have occurred if the region had remained a monarchy under Maharaja Ranjit Singh, instead of being subjected to democratic experiments. Kashmir could have been stable and prosperous under a Hindu monarchy. In fact, the entire Indian subcontinent could thrive under the rule of a Hindu or Sikh monarchy—or an authoritarian Hindu empire.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

A Hindu or Sikh minority cannot rule over a Muslim majority in a democracy, but a Hindu monarch or empire can certainly govern a Muslim-majority region. The Indian subcontinent was historically structured this way. It was only after we imposed a dysfunctional democracy upon ourselves that Muslims gained political power through voting. The genocide of Hindus in Kashmir might not have occurred if the region had remained a monarchy under Maharaja Ranjit Singh, instead of being subjected to democratic experiments. Kashmir could have been stable and prosperous under a Hindu monarchy. In fact, the entire Indian subcontinent could thrive under the rule of a Hindu or Sikh monarchy—or an authoritarian Hindu empire.

Completely agree but is it possible to have this monarchy again?? Government seems to only want to
be a good boy and try to grow the economy?

 

[Ajatshatru]

Completely agree but is it possible to have this monarchy again?? Government seems to only want to
be a good boy and try to grow the economy?

Economically, India will perform better under an authoritarian regime like China. BJP can achieve this transformation. Congress, under Indira Gandhi, also attempted to move India toward authoritarianism, but failed due to economic shortcomings and lack of widespread Hindu support. The BJP, however, has both public backing and a strong economy. What was difficult for Indira Gandhi in the 1970s will be much easier for BJP to accomplish in 2025.

 

[Ajayant Tripathi]

What you are asking requires BJP also to morally strengthen itself. Many of the BJP leaders are still beholden to gandhian ideas. It is only the hardcore faction that has kept these buffoons in check. Modi, Amit Shah, Yogiji does a lot for Hindutva and Hindu rule but their subordinates are busy virtue signalling.The fiasco by Hardeep Singh Puri ji, Nadda's wife against Diwali festivities and reluctance to unleash an undercurrent against judiciary and revision of textbooks.

UPSC and govt. exam questions are a solid process of systematizing Hindu pride. Still our education department, UPSC have been setting questions as usual. The UPSC mafia still peddle muslim love. We need to put an end to it.

I think the next step should be to define clearly what a minority is. Any religion with more than 10% population at the state level should not be considered minority.

 

[Nutcracker]

Kaneddian PM be like. Abe Jaldi bol subah Panvel nikalna hai global trade-war pe meeting ke liye.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/pakistan/comments/1jrimci/a_pakistanicanadian_taha_jamal_tj_goes_viral/

 

[Wayfarer]

Kaneddian PM be like. Abe Jaldi bol subah Panvel nikalna hai global trade-war pe meeting ke liye.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/pakistan/comments/1jrimci/a_pakistanicanadian_taha_jamal_tj_goes_viral/

They lose their train of thought if they don't say Inshallah 10 times in a sentence.