- Joined
- Jul 2, 2024
- Messages
- 1,114
- Likes
- 9,221
I know that.. Yahoo is allowing this level of promotion is abysmal.Quoting tha clown Hu Jixin, the former Global Times editor. Not a serious article, ignore.
I know that.. Yahoo is allowing this level of promotion is abysmal.Quoting tha clown Hu Jixin, the former Global Times editor. Not a serious article, ignore.
View attachment 34886
View attachment 34887
View attachment 34888
View attachment 34889View attachment 34890View attachment 34891
What an absolute bonker!!
Yahoo is running a Chinese fest.
All are due to non existent media engagement from our side.
French weapon bad... Chinese Good...
I've hardly seen this level of promotion.
"...and to start talks on a broad set of issues at a neutral site."
View: https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1921175185836708140?t=Tw9RYd2gnnmxeTODO2yMaA&s=19
Will it be able to tame Munir, or will they use this time to build themselves back?
The problem with having some sort of a deal with let's say Munir is that, he is not permanent, most likely on his way out. Different Porki army chiefs have different personalities which leads to change in policies.
Whosoever comes in his place, even if he wants to do something else for a change, he would be pushed back because all the people surrounding him will be jihadis.
It looks to me a temporary reprieve, unless Pakistan's polity itself changes and politicians start being the real boss, which looks too farfetched
View attachment 34886
View attachment 34887
View attachment 34888
View attachment 34889View attachment 34890View attachment 34891
What an absolute bonker!!
Yahoo is running a Chinese fest.
All are due to non existent media engagement from our side.
French weapon bad... Chinese Good...
I've hardly seen this level of promotion.
View attachment 34886
View attachment 34887
View attachment 34888
View attachment 34889View attachment 34890View attachment 34891
What an absolute bonker!!
Yahoo is running a Chinese fest.
All are due to non existent media engagement from our side.
French weapon bad... Chinese Good...
I've hardly seen this level of promotion.
Just like you have self hating indians with fucked up world view you also have self hating westerners whom you could call useful idiots. They work extra hard for anything anti western. That also sometimes includes giving blow jobs to xi jingpingView attachment 34886
View attachment 34887
View attachment 34888
View attachment 34889View attachment 34890View attachment 34891
What an absolute bonker!!
Yahoo is running a Chinese fest.
All are due to non existent media engagement from our side.
French weapon bad... Chinese Good...
I've hardly seen this level of promotion.
Well, even CNN was doing the same, give PR for CCP wares.
You are forgetting the 2024 election results. One election swinging to the left is enough for this country to goto dogs.Guys please understand. Our growth is higher than both china and pakistan. Any time purchased through ceasefire only makes us stronger, and our MIC complex becomes more stronger with each passing year.
Those of who were around at the time of pulwama, would remember the difference between then and now
View attachment 34886
View attachment 34887
View attachment 34888
View attachment 34889View attachment 34890View attachment 34891
What an absolute bonker!!
Yahoo is running a Chinese fest.
All are due to non existent media engagement from our side.
French weapon bad... Chinese Good...
I've hardly seen this level of promotion.
Also their nuclear nanga naach was exposed, nobody further will take porli nuke seriously anymore.I see a lot of RR over the ceasefire, which is stupid.
Take a step back. What did we want to achieve. Was it disintegration of Pakistan now?
We wanted to achieve a clear deterrence for terrorism. Consider this:
1. We scrapped IWT. It is bigger than any nuclear bomb. Once we build all the controls over the Indus water, Pakistan will be on its knees.
2. We declared that any future terrorist attack from Pak will be considered an act of war. It will act as a significant deterrence.
When we started with missile attacks, our signaling was clear. We targeted terror infra and avoided military targets. We clearly said that we did not want to escalate and would escalate only if Pakistan responds, that too in the same domain and with restraints.
Now consider this. Uncle Sam threatened Pak to call India and declare that they would not escalate. Now, the ball was in India's court. What justification was there for us to not take the caesefire?
That pakistan is still filled with terrorists like masud azhar, daud ibrahim who have in the past harmed us. We will not stop till they are handed over. Ofcourse they would not agree so we keep pouncing.I see a lot of RR over the ceasefire, which is stupid.
Take a step back. What did we want to achieve. Was it disintegration of Pakistan now?
We wanted to achieve a clear deterrence for terrorism. Consider this:
1. We scrapped IWT. It is bigger than any nuclear bomb. Once we build all the controls over the Indus water, Pakistan will be on its knees.
2. We declared that any future terrorist attack from Pak will be considered an act of war. It will act as a significant deterrence.
When we started with missile attacks, our signaling was clear. We targeted terror infra and avoided military targets. We clearly said that we did not want to escalate and would escalate only if Pakistan responds, that too in the same domain and with restraints.
Now consider this. Uncle Sam threatened Pak to call India and declare that they would not escalate. Now, the ball was in India's court. What justification was there for us to not take the caesefire?
This country is not JOKE, the leaders and babus are JOKES. See the long line of young Indian men waiting to be a volunteer. See their josh, their passion. Our leaders have always disappointed. From Prithviraj Chauhan to todays' political leadership. Its a curse that the Hindu can't be a good visionary leader.You are forgetting the 2024 election results. One election swinging to the left is enough for this country to goto dogs.
Anyways my last comment, except the armed forces and a few sane people, this country doesnt give a shit about its people. There is no courage or guts only cowards , cucks and uncivilized idiots. The terrorists who killed hindus are still not found. Once again except the armed forces, this country is a joke and filled with jokers.
You are underestimating your enemy, an enemy whose default dharma is to bleed you by a thousand cuts.Guys please understand. Our growth is higher than both china and pakistan. Any time purchased through ceasefire only makes us stronger, and our MIC complex becomes more stronger with each passing year.
Those of who were around at the time of pulwama, would remember the difference between then and now
Also disintegration of pak will cause refugees are all of you guys sure we want to go to that way. Also our MIC is in nascent stage. You are still dependent on importsI see a lot of RR over the ceasefire, which is stupid.
Take a step back. What did we want to achieve. Was it disintegration of Pakistan now?
We wanted to achieve a clear deterrence for terrorism. Consider this:
1. We scrapped IWT. It is bigger than any nuclear bomb. Once we build all the controls over the Indus water, Pakistan will be on its knees.
2. We declared that any future terrorist attack from Pak will be considered an act of war. It will act as a significant deterrence.
When we started with missile attacks, our signaling was clear. We targeted terror infra and avoided military targets. We clearly said that we did not want to escalate and would escalate only if Pakistan responds, that too in the same domain and with restraints.
Now consider this. Uncle Sam threatened Pak to call India and declare that they would not escalate. Now, the ball was in India's court. What justification was there for us to not take the caesefire?
Now when the porks commit another terror watch it will take be just well hidden nothing more.I see a lot of RR over the ceasefire, which is stupid.
Take a step back. What did we want to achieve. Was it disintegration of Pakistan now?
We wanted to achieve a clear deterrence for terrorism. Consider this:
1. We scrapped IWT. It is bigger than any nuclear bomb. Once we build all the controls over the Indus water, Pakistan will be on its knees.
2. We declared that any future terrorist attack from Pak will be considered an act of war. It will act as a significant deterrence.
When we started with missile attacks, our signaling was clear. We targeted terror infra and avoided military targets. We clearly said that we did not want to escalate and would escalate only if Pakistan responds, that too in the same domain and with restraints.
Now consider this. Uncle Sam threatened Pak to call India and declare that they would not escalate. Now, the ball was in India's court. What justification was there for us to not take the caesefire?