I will rather suggest to be factual when on disadvantage and try to built your own narrative when you have advantage in any argument then going in loop to defend on their narrative.
Problem is, We hesitate to strike on their weak point fearing appeared racist meanwhile they always strike where you are the weak.
Always be extremely derogatory where they are weak.
Some wignat weak points where you twist the knife in
>Dying, low TFR society, about to be replaced by Greens/Nijjers(EU) or Spics/Nijjets(US)
>Whorish white women, absolutely unmarriagable, pucci like beef roast after whole youth spent getting pounded
>Whitey can't land a woman, even if he does she will cheat on him and any way it will result in divorce
>Followed by child support bux
>Women taken and mixed race kids produced by the aforementioned foreign tribes without any issues
>Which means whitey is an incel who can't get any, not even sloppy seconds
>Therefore the whitoid then simps for chink women, most of whom are gold diggers interested in his passport and not his pink sausage
>Resulting in Elliot Rodgers type kids who look 100% like their mother
>0 support from fellow whiteys over the impending doom befalling them, everyone in the moh maya of Leftism
>Even right wing politicians are frauds/uesless like Meloni or Trump
>voting won't save you
>The Jew is behind this but whitey will get cancelled out of existence if he mentions this
There are a lot more maybe y'all can also add.
Whiteoids will be extinct or in minority in their now majority "relevant" countries like EU Big 5 and the Anglo-Saxon colony countries in the next 100 years and
there is nothing they can do about this, always drive this point in.
