Maybe because they are still a minority. Furthermore, whether it is forced conversion or soft conversion, both are engaged in cultural subversion. I was talking to a few Nagaland Christians when I was in Kohima, and they genuinely believe that British colonization was good for India and for them, considering us savages back then. They even demonize their own ancestors and regard the British as their saviors. And don't get me wrong, their views of Hindus are the same as those of bullas. For them, we are just a "cult of people worshipping demons."
I care about whats happening on ground, as I mentioned, those CIA's Yeshu di balle balle missionaries are the real problem, your average Christian guy in India isn't going around proselytising others. Obviously many NE converts will say that as they were converted by them and other pigskins after being brainwashed.
The major disruptors of coexistence are those who believe, "Everyone other than me is wrong, and I must bring everyone onto my righteous path. If you don't follow my path, you are evil."
Absolutely correct, but vast majority of them are bullas, rest are Christians. Bullas actually all across the earth are rampaging killing everyone whom they deem as kuffar, how many Christians are doing so? Especially those in India?
That's a gross generalization. I might be biased here since my point of reference is limited to NE Christians. I have never met Southern Christians in real life, so I can't say anything about them. Leaving aside the Kanglu bullas, most Assamese bullas I have met turned out to be very patriotic. However, I have never met any Christians from the NE who were patriotic; most of them were separatists and wanted their own country.
North East is a tribal mess, never forget one of the biggest separatist movement in North East was ULFA, an Ahomia separatist movement started by Assamese Hindus against the Indian Republic due to xenophobic racial narcissism. Although I don't justify kashmiri bullas and their jihadism, but even they have separatist tendencies due to not just islam, but their extremely racist neo-nazi xenophobia against non-Kashmiris, even if muslim. They regularly shoot and kill muslims from Indian mainland including Jammu working in Kashmir. As I am posting this they are targeting a UP muslim just for wearing a Pheran and uploading the video online. Heck they don't even spare Gujjar and Bakarwal muslims. This behaviour is visible in many Pandits and Sikhs in valley.
Again, khalistani movement was started by Sikhs who were slaves of the burgerchod republic, am I supposed to hate Sikhism because some of them are indulging in khali khopdi pajeetery in Canada? Or am I supposed to abuse Buddhists because of ambedkarites and sinhalas killing Hindu Tamils in Sri Lanka?
NE Christians infact join the Army in large numbers, funny enough, so do muslims from J&K.
What's wrong with agnostics?
Agnostics/atheists end up mostly being left loonies and enemies of Hindutva. For them all religions are fake, but more so the one they left. Kind of an ex-muslim might criticise all religions but he'll abuse his own the most and so on.
Again, that's just a difference in culture. I think the reason we don't eat beef is mostly due to the impact of agriculture. Cows were useful in agricultural societies, so eating them was forbidden. Similarly, they don't eat dogs in Burgerland because they are considered pets.
Doesn't matter, Gau Hatya is a sin in Sanatan dharma.