Protectionism vs Indian National AI Muscle building program
--------------------------------
Thanks for bringing up this very important question, Sadanand - I should have been clearer in my eassay. The idea is NOT to restrict customers' AI technology choice - it is counter productive. Customers are free to choose what they want (allowed by data locality needs).
Then how these Indian AI labs will make money?
Recall how DARPA works:
---------------------------
The Indian AI labs will be labs - with no obligation to sell (if they still do successfully, they keep the upside). They work on research projects. Their funding is decided by purely outcomes of foundation model quality. They have to open source their research and models.
They are given progressively increasing challenges to meet/exceed benchmarks so that they reach SOTA in no more than 3 years. Again SOTA is a moving target, it needs to be reviewed from time to time to change the pace.
This is how OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek (funded single handedly by High Flyer), Qwen (funded single handedly by Alibaba) were in early days. This is how DARPA helps teams to chase crazy ideas without revenue goals, but "measurable outcomes and short timelines". Below are notes about DARPA funding.
This is also how Chinese Provincial governments encourage EV, Solar Panel, Semiconductor startups. Research in early days is funded by government with clear goals.
Focus Area:
-------------
1. LLMs are not the only Foundation models. There are Vision, Voice, Robotics foundation models. And then there are multiple multi-modal models.
2. The program also need to focus on India specific dataset (already happening - thanks to IITs and startup like Saravam), but moreover, we need to build evaluation sets that are sorely lacking in low resource languages.
3. We also need to focus on hardware and think about being able to work with multiple supply chains, as well as, learn to build models at various sizes. Start with Nvidia in early days. India also has lot of chip design first and emerging manufacturing ecosystem (though it will take time).
4. We also need to work with defense, security, weather, healthcare services to see their needs can be met/or they can sponsor challenges, provide datasets & establish the benchmarks (this should ideally be done in year 2).
Be Vishwa-Vidyarthi first (one who learns from everyone).
------------------------------------------
Initially there will be lot of "reinventing the wheel" in terms of setting up the pipelines, or recreating things already created elsewhere; but that is how you learn: by copying the masters.
That is how SONY become good at making transistors and then they gifted WALKMAN to the world.
Chinese have no shame in doing it, Indians should not either. Remember walk before run.
Why India must be good at building foundation model when there are open source ones?
------------------------------------
India is a glorious civilisation, that can not choose to depend on hostile nations. At the same time, India can contribute to local and global prosperity by building this technology.
Analogy
----------
This program is like going for morning jog/gym. You do it to build lung & heart capacity and muscles. It instantly doesn't give you money, but enables you to earn more money by keeping you energetic and vibrant through out the day.
This shall be India's National AI Muscle building program. It will spin up a high tech ecosystem through spin offs - the way it works in Israel, China and USA.
3 billion USD over 3 years is price too cheap not to miss this industrial revolution. I will write later how I arrived at this number.
Thanks Sadanand for posing this question, and everyone who supported me through their retweets. I am new to writing on twitter.