View: https://x.com/GeneralBakshi/status/1904233028169388130?t=44jddIRi-NhDofIwS-zJzw&s=19
Finally someone from the fraternity is calling out the BS
How will jernails get top tier yahudi bitches without rfi, please understand.I wish it happens this very moment with 3 times the numbers of ATAGS... but fast acquisition is only possible if ATAGS route is taken & not multi vendor RFI route.
The former DG artillery talks about ATAGs being overweight and not suitable for bridges that can only withstand 15 tonnes. No one ever asked him why Army is not improving its logistics so that it can help move higher caliber weapons.
The former DG artillery talks about ATAGs being overweight and not suitable for bridges that can only withstand 15 tonnes. No one ever asked him why Army is not improving its logistics so that it can help move higher caliber weapons.
Aah, but who my friend will bell the cat ? Our esteemed presstitutes ? Who only want to cover urduwood, cricket & politics and do circle jerk debates 24-7-365. There are some sensible twatter defence journos but they're too much of scaredy cats to ask tough questions lest their 'ekshkloojive' coverage rights and sources go phut. Pathetic state of affairs I know, where none of these genrols nor c.lobby is being called out or held accountableNo one ever asked him why Army is not improving its logistics so that it can help move higher caliber weapons.
Absolutely IT'LL BE A TRUE GAME-CHANGER WORLD-CLASS WEAPON SYSTEM IN ITS CATAGORY, ESPECIALLY WITH THE NEW ROCKET-ASSISTED SHELL ( 57+km ) and RAMJET-ASSISTED SHELL (80+ km)...in my opinion at least 1000 unit should be ordered at first.I sway this is the most sexiest thing what DRDO has made...Minimum Order 700 Nos.
seems this response by @Hawkeye covered this query of mine above with further explanations on what we may need in future warfarei know and understand about weight constraints, mobility issues and all, but still just as a concept, i was wondering, if it's possible and feasible for us to retire artilleries under 155mm, replaced by different range-weight class artilleries in 155mm
like 105mm IFG, 130mm M-46 replaced by 155mm/39 cal lightweight artilleries by Bharat Forge - meanwhile we're already upgunning M-46 to 155mm 'Sharang' artilleries here
In a future of excessive drone presence and very short counter battery time. I don't see any future for either M777 or Kalyani ULH.
Only use case for lighter howitzers is either in Air assault or air drop ops, there too it comes with few things which will be needed absolutely. A similar near 5 tonnes class prime mover which can be similarly air dropped or carried by helis. And ability of the ULH with own APU to move a bit of distance on its own like Singaporean Pegasus LWH smart design choice,to be quickly come into action, automatically lay the gun towards target and getting out of action as fast as possible. With getting out of action and be ready in towed position being the thing which we would want more. I hope this parameter is kept of utmost importance where you just basically press a button and the whole gun moves on its own and changes from firing mode to towed mode within a minute or one and half time period, for ATAGS and future ALTGS as well.
Kalyani ULH is more of a M777 like design and imo not future proof. They should definitely team up with Drdo as developing lighter weight structures, hybrid recoil systems is already in the future roadmap of Drdo for artillery guns.
I believe such a system can be made which could even turn out to be lighter than m777 as it only uses conventional recoil systems.
Not only that with now possible less than a ton 105mm howitzer and less than 2 tons 122mm howitzer, we should also explore the possibility of longer barrel and longer range systems based on above calibres and look at the possibility of very light air droppable and heli carried self propelled variants based on those.
I am pretty sure that in case of war with China, all these gold plated M777 with Shi* mobility and very little availablity of heli carriage support with us will be easy pickings just like that in Ukraine.
But much ATAGS weight is too much Saar. Musings of our forces where weight should not be a matter. M777 with all its light weight is still very much inferior to ATAGS in every parameter which is useful. And Atags can always be paired with a powerful prime mover to improve mobility in mountains. And I doubt you would be able to take m777 to a place where Atags can't be towed to.
We don't even need to look far for inspiration. Just look at the chinese.
View attachment 28940
View attachment 28941
That also reminds me that we definitely need to launch our own heavy lift heli program asap.
And we do have Kalyani Garuda V2 but definitely feels it can be improved further in design rather than straight away copy of Hawkeye.
i know and understand about weight constraints, mobility issues and all, but still just as a concept, i was wondering, if it's possible and feasible for us to retire artilleries under 155mm, replaced by different range-weight class artilleries in 155mm
like 105mm IFG, 130mm M-46 replaced by 155mm/39 cal lightweight artilleries by Bharat Forge - meanwhile we're already upgunning M-46 to 155mm 'Sharang' artilleries here