India should've been incentivising our own industry and OEMs, through R&D funds and industrial subsidies while inviting foreign OEMs at the same time.
this conversation is going in circles for a few years now, let's move the needle forward a bit, now that we have recent examples that can be cited.
take ola, mahindra and ather EVs, those came out of domestic r&d, it's not like public are buying them because there is a domestic r&d component in those products. Indian public's priority is value for money, Indian public is not saying "take my money, and please keep innovating".
since this is a defence forum, defence is a sector where there is active and visible r&d spending. and we are seeing how orders are panning out in each product category.
in a market where customer's top priority is value for money, some one has to pay for the high risk proposition and failures.
if banks fund such risks, news headlines will say "growing NPAs".
if RBI funds such risks, news headlines will say "growing interest rates".
if gormint fund such risks, news headlines will say "growing interest payments".
if companies fund such risks, news headlines will say "XYZ company has not been profitable for n years".
any direction taken, there will be risks and tradeoffs.
point being, r&d investment is not a binary proposition of "every one should do it or no one is doing it".
i think we need to dig a bit deeper into commercial aspect of r&d spending, other than news paper opeds that deal with this subject at macro level, not sure how much info is available for Indian scenarios.