Indian Politics and Democracy

Last edited:
Anants said:
If implemented good in short run, but will be bad in long run. imagine all states getting voted to congress and even centre because of weak pro BJP vibe in India? Agar aisa hua toh congi hi bjp ko constituion change karke dikhage karey ga
Click to expand...
Yes, it should be more like the system of US where they have mid-terms around 2 years after the Presidential elections.
If we have all state elections together then there are high chances multiple states get swept in wave at center.​
 
SKC said:
Yes, it should be more like the system of US where they have mid-terms around 2 years after the Presidential elections.
If we have all state elections together then there are high chances multiple states get swept in wave at center.​
Click to expand...
BJP loves to dig a Hole on ground and then invites opposite to push itself in the hole in the ground itself. Remember foreign investment in Media ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKC
One nation, One election does not bode well for BJP. The intent is noble since we as a developing country cannot be in election mode all year. However, the implications are not good. It is better off to club few state elections to be held simultaneously instead. For example, why can't they club Maharashtra, Haryana, J & K, Jharkand, and Delhi to be held all at once? Same can be applied next year, postpone Bihar elections and hold it together with states going for elections in 2026. This is far better than having it all at once since state issues and national issues needs separate attention from public and in the media. National issues will trump and bury important issues at state level if both elections are held together.
 
concard said:
One nation, One election does not bode well for BJP. The intent is noble since we as a developing country cannot be in election mode all year. However, the implications are not good. It is better off to club few state elections to be held simultaneously instead. For example, why can't they club Maharashtra, Haryana, J & K, Jharkand, and Delhi to be held all at once? Same can be applied next year, postpone Bihar elections and hold it together with states going for elections in 2026. This is far better than having it all at once since state issues and national issues needs separate attention from public and in the media. National issues will trump and bury important issues at state level if both elections are held together.
Click to expand...
Why not have state elections nationwide 30 months after general elections?
 
FalconSlayers said:
Why not have state elections nationwide 30 months after general elections?
Click to expand...

All states have different issues and problems. How will the media or the parties highlight the issues and get attention from people? This will be a recipe for people to spread fake news, create panic, promise unrealistic things and win elections. If there is a election in 30 states, you bet Himachal, Uttarakhand, Goa, even Southern states will find takers in the media. They will be busy reporting about UP, Bihar, Bengal, Maharashtra etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Unknowncommando
Indian Air Force's MiG-29UPG
Replies
0
Views
68
Unknowncommando
Unknowncommando
FalconSlayers
Indian Coast Guard
Replies
0
Views
113
FalconSlayers
FalconSlayers
O
Mosque Demolitions in Indian Subcontinent Through History
Replies
4
Views
228
shade2
shade2
Unknowncommando
Indian Army Corps of Signals
Replies
0
Views
83
Unknowncommando
Unknowncommando
Unknowncommando
Indian Army Training
Replies
2
Views
126
Unknowncommando
Unknowncommando

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top