Indo-China Border & LAC

If Bhutan actually merges with India , there'd be no buffer left & all the territories lost to Chinese salami slicing becomes ours to claim not to mention this will act as a grave provocation to China.

You can bet the next war then will be triggered by seeing them attempt something similar to Doklam in 2017 but with a full fledged army along with ALL the supporting elements.

At the same time , our options are limited . Even if there's no merger & Bhutan tries its best to postpone the inevitable by stalling talks like it has done in the past , China'd still come calling with similar force levels as described above to force the issue. Bhutan is simply in no position to oppose them . What will our response be ?

Whichever way the problem is diced , confrontation becomes inevitable. We just cannot permit the Chinese into Doklam being passive to their aggression , expecting the best . Appeasement has never worked nor will it work in the present day .

Sure but with Bhutan being our dependant by treaty militarily, bhutan's salami slicing claims become ours anyways - just to a lesser degree than if bhutan was Indian sovereign territory.

Ultimately having Bhutan also means we create a flank around Chinese dagger thrust position in Doklam by chicken's neck and close ranks to tawang.Those alone are worth poking the dragon for because if we poke the dragon by improving our defence on chicken's neck, so be it.
 
Sure but with Bhutan being our dependant by treaty militarily, bhutan's salami slicing claims become ours anyways - just to a lesser degree than if bhutan was Indian sovereign territory.

Ultimately having Bhutan also means we create a flank around Chinese dagger thrust position in Doklam by chicken's neck and close ranks to tawang.Those alone are worth poking the dragon for because if we poke the dragon by improving our defence on chicken's neck, so be it.
POKING the Dragon wah bhai ......is China a real Dragon !!!

I have only seen PIGS in china..

So stop glorifying chinese by calling Them So called Dragon bcoz our street dogs are more powerful than their Dragons

Next time you can use PIGS, BAT MUNCHERS, LADYBOYS..
 
POKING the Dragon wah bhai ......is China a real Dragon !!!

I have only seen PIGS in china..

So stop glorifying chinese by calling Them So called Dragon bcoz our street dogs are more powerful than their Dragons

Next time you can use PIGS, BAT MUNCHERS, LADYBOYS..

Dragon is a mythical animal, with many ascribed superpowers and qualities

Elephant, Tiger etc are all real animals.


I mean it's apt for China since nobody has actually seen their military capabilities, people only see their production and rapid iteration capabilities and start dhoti-shivering.
 
POKING the Dragon wah bhai ......is China a real Dragon !!!

I have only seen PIGS in china..

So stop glorifying chinese by calling Them So called Dragon bcoz our street dogs are more powerful than their Dragons

Next time you can use PIGS, BAT MUNCHERS, LADYBOYS..
RULE #1 of adversarial contests : never ever underestimate your enemies. our ancestors did with the mleccha from the western lands. Look at nateeja.
 
chinese have surpassed US in satellite tech

a SAR satellite in geosynchronous orbit that can see large portion indo pacific , and its orbits right over the andamans / nicobar islands .

they can track our naval ships 24hr / 7 with this . and they published technical details on it as well

 
chinese have surpassed US in satellite tech

a SAR satellite in geosynchronous orbit that can see large portion indo pacific , and its orbits right over the andamans / nicobar islands .

they can track our naval ships 24hr / 7 with this . and they published technical details on it as well

It's ability of real time tracking and targeting and it being on higher orbit( Harder for a Asat missile to hit).
Balantly tells, it will be used to guide df21 anti ship MRBM to target american carrier group.
And in future will also be used to guide anti ship varient of df17 hgv under development.


That also tells us about another great feature of our LRASHM, we don't need real time target and tracking for it work( can be jammed, satellite can be destroyed), neither we will need to invest billions of dollars to biuld a guidance chain to guide the missile, neither extra money to make that guidance chain redundance.
Just need to know the position of the target, once the data is fed into lrashm, then it doesn't need any other data, will use it's Inertial navigation to reach the general location in few minutes( in few minutes a ship can only travel few kilometers, so relativelys small variation) and will then activate it's large aesa seeker.

While df21 being a mrbm with Marv warhead will need to rely on external guidance even then it can be taken down in boost and midcourse( while lrashm will fly at lot lower attitude, just like a scramjet hcm ), and those Marv warheads will not be as accurate as lrashm(has a seeker).

The place where lrashm lags behind df21 and df17 Is range, *BUT* it's range is sufficient for us In Indian ocean region, so not a downside for us.

God I love thae missile.
If were talking "individual" missile then, lrashm will be most hard to intercept anti ship missile in the world, when it enters service.
df 21 forced US carriers to operate more farther away, lrashm will force PLAN to never bring their carrier group in the Indian ocean itself, plus the geography will further help us.
This missile will change the entire power play in Indian ocean.

All right, I'm done with my fanboying.
 
Non serious armed forces, clueless government... Kuch nhi hona inn logon se
ITBP DG shares his experience with drones in sikkim
and other discussions as well.

in another session from same seminar, BSF is having good kill/success rate on paki side. but these are drones used for smuggling.
=======

Seminar on UAS Warfare with Special Focus on Counter-UAS​


View: https://youtu.be/fCdLqO0bVDc
 
Last edited:


News report based on a social media post from Chinese side.

I will believe it when a reputable journalist reports it or someone shows some credible proof.

Non serious armed forces, clueless government... Kuch nhi hona inn logon se

Stop is useless RR. If your neighbour reports that your hens are eaten by wolf would you start crying first or check your coops ?
 
Non serious armed forces, clueless government... Kuch nhi hona inn logon se
arreh kaka, kis cheez ko kise saat link kar rahe hai.

When you operate a RF system with such frequency close to chinese borders (and given how old the Searchers are) any competent foe would use ELINT and SIGINT to find out the RF band, capture streams and run cryptanalysis to crack the protocol.
Once that is done taking over is child's play. the Iranians did the same to RQ4 Global Hawks too, before CENTCOM moved heaven and earth to use dynamic encryption on the fly.
Searchers are old and outdated drones.
Armed forces were already planning replacement of them for years, with the tapas program and now the archer ng.
 


Again, where did he say that our drone got "hacked" / got controlled ? He says when we tried to transgress our drones to the China side we "lost" them.


Most probably referring to this.

I am asking for proof of today's news, not in general our drone situation at the border vis-a-vis China which everyone is aware.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top