Indo Pak Border & LOC

Whole PoK is a burden considering the hostile locals, Better if we find some inroads within GB connecting the central asian region. Capturing a strategic route and withholding the gained area should be our main objective
We can easily advance in GB area from our last village Thang ( that valley has small villages with sparsely populated on the banks of river Indus and shyok with road running on either side ) and move up to skardu ( pak air base) if we neutralise it we can move up to Gilgit agency and hold the territory but so called Azad Kashmir mirpur and Muzaffarabad is a mess with rabid Islamists hating India so take back Sharda peet in Neelam valley and Haji peer pass that’s enough to bully Pakistan. Cutting down the aknoor bulge will be significant as well in protecting south Kashmir infiltration.
 
We can easily advance in GB area from our last village Thang ( that valley has small villages with sparsely populated on the banks of river Indus and shyok with road running on either side ) and move up to skardu ( pak air base) if we neutralise it we can move up to Gilgit agency and hold the territory but so called Azad Kashmir mirpur and Muzaffarabad is a mess with rabid Islamists hating India so take back Sharda peet in Neelam valley and Haji peer pass that’s enough to bully Pakistan. Cutting down the aknoor bulge will be significant as well in protecting south Kashmir infiltration.
path to GB is almost entirely mountains, we will have to neutralize paki artillery and command posts before infantry can move in, which require either IAF to establish air superiority in the area ,which is not possible, or other way is we pound pakis with missiles, ideally with pralay and LR-LACM when it ready.

The real issue here is we lack fire power to do an "big offensive", we do have fire power for defending or retaliation and probably to push back pakis a little bit, but entering and holding territory is whole another task. We can't hold territory with current amount of artillery pieces, there is also issue of our infantry, these areas being unprotected , we need tons of MRAPS, IFV to move around in mountains forest and avoid ambushes, we need anti-drone measures for FPV drones and whole a lot that I probably don't even know.
 
path to GB is almost entirely mountains, we will have to neutralize paki artillery and command posts before infantry can move in, which require either IAF to establish air superiority in the area ,which is not possible, or other way is we pound pakis with missiles, ideally with pralay and LR-LACM when it ready.

The real issue here is we lack fire power to do an "big offensive", we do have fire power for defending or retaliation and probably to push back pakis a little bit, but entering and holding territory is whole another task. We can't hold territory with current amount of artillery pieces, there is also issue of our infantry, these areas being unprotected , we need tons of MRAPS, IFV to move around in mountains forest and avoid ambushes, we need anti-drone measures for FPV drones and whole a lot that I probably don't even know.
Pakistan has nothing above in the Gilgit baltistan other than a air base at skardu. If you watch baltistan videos the valley can be easily controlled till skardu. The only thing lacks is will to do offensive stuff because we are majorly a defensive force from independence.
 
Pakistan has nothing above in the Gilgit baltistan other than a air base at skardu. If you watch baltistan videos the valley can be easily controlled till skardu. The only thing lacks is will to do offensive stuff because we are majorly a defensive force from independence.
pretty much defensive nature of our forces in the main hurdle, also ig diplomatic stuff
 
You really surprise me at times. Back in the 90s Fukuyama came up with the end of history & the last man . The west won the Cold War. That was the biggest existential threat to the world . Nobody thought they'd survive that period for mutual paranoia ruled. Nobody expected it to end in a whimper. Yet it did.

Hence Fukuyama wrote the end of history & the last man. To him & many like him there'd never be an existential threat again from totalitarianism & western enlightenment & liberalism having won would rule the day with the entire world accepting it . (Of course I'm greatly simplifying his theory) .

Yet here we are on the cusp of another great war.

We're not ditching anything , neither Aksai Chin nor PoJ&K. We'd take them at a time of our choosing. We've waited 500 years for Ayodhya & have experienced enslavement for a millenium. What's 75-100 years ?! A speck on windscreen of time.
In 75-100 years, Indian demographics will change so much that either we will be in Sharia or with a cuck'd govt which will toe Sharia. Things need to be sorted out in the next 2 decades, or we can simply stop pretending that we really care about such civilizational goals.
 
If u want the land grow balls..

Or shut the F up and chill!!

I am ok both ways but not 50:50 way where you dont have balls but want to do jumlebaazi.
you-nailed-it-50eea00efe.jpg
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top