Indo US Relations (7 Viewers)

I wouldn't be surprised if Trump has publicly uttered the word 'India' in his 6 months more than all previous US presidents together have since India's independence.

On one hand it gives a hint of India's rising status, but on the other hand it feels a little icky. (Forget us already)


View: https://x.com/sidhant/status/1938725486777245925?t=RcxCKHrcKC35jDRrxZvlpA&s=19

It's more sinister dolund wants a nobel his insecurity wrt obama is rising.


View: https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1938699322805362724?t=RD-0E2LcB3rKzkOXnC1Llg&s=19

Maybe abraham accords 2.0 after syria maybe porkis will recognize israel and end of ummah chummah poliostein.


View: https://x.com/CNNnews18/status/1938410954678534161?t=WBabyvjR5oMINfWKnVDIrw&s=19

 
India Alone: Betrayed by the West, Cornered by Enemies

Fourteen years of patient diplomacy to align with the West unraveled in May during Operation Sindoor. Despite clear evidence that Pakistan sponsored the terror attack that killed 26 Indian tourists in Kashmir, the West—led by President Trump—sided with Islamabad. Adding insult, Trump welcomed the Pakistani general linked to the killings to a White House lunch.

Worse, Trump used a pending trade deal to pressure India into ending its air campaign against offender Pakistan—though he later denied it. Russia remained silent. China, predictably hostile, was embarrassed when its military gear supplied to Pakistan failed. Europe offered only muted concern.

India’s foreign policy bet on the West has collapsed.

Now, with its $10 trillion economy goal and 8% growth target, India urgently needs capital and technology. The West has both, but not without strings. Russia, distracted in Ukraine, has neither. China has money, but its technology is third-rate and copied. Europe may help, but only for a price India can’t always pay.

India’s exports are not yet strong enough to fund large-scale tech acquisitions or secure greater market access to the West. Still, New Delhi must not yield to Trump’s transactional threats. If the trade deal isn’t in India’s interest, reject it.
India is too big to be bullied. If America wants to back Pakistan, let it. The next jihadi strike may target U.S. interests—and that will be Trump’s lesson.

PM Modi should act boldly: Refuse the deal. Resume oil and gas imports from Iran. Help rebuild Iranian civilian infrastructure destroyed by U.S. and Israeli bombing. Take back the island in the Bay of Bengal the U.S. eyes for a base.

Trump’s chaotic foreign policy must be challenged. India has changed—and it will no longer bend.
 
A Paki passport and a Paki child, is it even possible without collusion of Pakis?
Could be that he has a Pakistani legend from past work. Based on what I read earlier in news, this guy was a drug & weapon trafficker and Pakistan is kind of a haven for both.

I am just exploring possibilities, if he is a double that worked against Indian interests then why is Indian Government trying to help him now.
 
A Paki passport and a Paki child, is it even possible without collusion of Pakis?
Well why would think that? That could also means he was great at being a spy. Don't forget many of our spy even on the verge of becoming member of parliament there before moraji busted them..

Isn't it normal for a spy to have a family & passport/ID card of the country they were spying?
 
Well why would think that? That could also means he was great at being a spy. Don't forget many of our spy even on the verge of becoming member of parliament there before moraji busted them..

Isn't it normal for a spy to have a family & passport/ID card of the country they were spying?

It would depend what name was he using on Paki passport. Was he using a M name or Gupta ji was using his original name.
 
India Alone: Betrayed by the West, Cornered by Enemies

Fourteen years of patient diplomacy to align with the West unraveled in May during Operation Sindoor. Despite clear evidence that Pakistan sponsored the terror attack that killed 26 Indian tourists in Kashmir, the West—led by President Trump—sided with Islamabad. Adding insult, Trump welcomed the Pakistani general linked to the killings to a White House lunch.

Worse, Trump used a pending trade deal to pressure India into ending its air campaign against offender Pakistan—though he later denied it. Russia remained silent. China, predictably hostile, was embarrassed when its military gear supplied to Pakistan failed. Europe offered only muted concern.

India’s foreign policy bet on the West has collapsed.

Now, with its $10 trillion economy goal and 8% growth target, India urgently needs capital and technology. The West has both, but not without strings. Russia, distracted in Ukraine, has neither. China has money, but its technology is third-rate and copied. Europe may help, but only for a price India can’t always pay.

India’s exports are not yet strong enough to fund large-scale tech acquisitions or secure greater market access to the West. Still, New Delhi must not yield to Trump’s transactional threats. If the trade deal isn’t in India’s interest, reject it.
India is too big to be bullied. If America wants to back Pakistan, let it. The next jihadi strike may target U.S. interests—and that will be Trump’s lesson.

PM Modi should act boldly: Refuse the deal. Resume oil and gas imports from Iran. Help rebuild Iranian civilian infrastructure destroyed by U.S. and Israeli bombing. Take back the island in the Bay of Bengal the U.S. eyes for a base.

Trump’s chaotic foreign policy must be challenged. India has changed—and it will no longer bend.

What island are you referring to? Diego Garcia? It still remains under the British and by extension the Americans. The Chagos Island is going to be returned to Mauritius due to our diplomatic moves, but the rest won't.

The damage to Iranian civilian facilities was minimal. The IDF targeted the mullahs only with minimal casualties. Not advisable to try at this stage.
 
How serious are we in this? I don't see what more potentially we could do about defense cooperation with the Americans, considering how they left us hanging for the GE-414 engines and are currently unreliable even towards their own vassals.

U.S., India Talk 10-Year Cooperative Framework, Defense Cooperation, Shared Priorities


Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth met today at the Pentagon with India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar to discuss the close cooperation between the two countries, weapons sales and the upcoming signing of the framework for the new defense partnership.

"Almost right at the beginning of the administration, President [Donald J.] Trump and Prime Minister Shri [Narendra] Modi set a strong foundation for our relationship, which we're building on here today: productive, pragmatic and realistic," Hegseth said. "And our nations boast a rich and growing history of cooperation driven by a shared commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific."

The secretary said both the U.S. and India are mutually aware of the security concerns in the region, and both nations have the ability to counter that threat together. He also touched on U.S. efforts to provide India with the tools needed to counter threats in the Indo-Pacific region.

"The United States is very pleased with the successful integration of many U.S. defense items into India's inventory," Hegseth said. "And building on this progress, we hope we can complete several major pending U.S. defense sales to India, expand our shared defense industrial cooperation and coproduction efforts, strengthen interoperability ... between our forces, and then formally sign a new 10-year Framework for the U.S.-India Major Defense Partnership ... which we hope to do very soon."

During a meeting in February between Trump and Modi, the two leaders announced plans to pursue new procurements and coproduction arrangements for Javelin antitank guided missiles and Stryker armored vehicles. Also discussed was procurement for six additional P-8I maritime patrol aircraft.

India has already integrated into its own military weapons, such as the C‑130J Super Hercules, C‑17 Globemaster III and P‑8I Poseidon aircraft, as well as the CH‑47F Chinook, MH‑60R Sea Hawk and AH‑64E Apache. India also utilizes the Harpoon antiship missiles, M777 howitzers and MQ‑9B Sky Guardians.

Also in February, the president and prime minister pledged to increase military cooperation with enhanced training, exercises and operations.

Hegseth and Jaishankar discussed participation in the next India-U.S. Defense Acceleration Ecosystem Summit, where the two nations will continue to build on U.S.-India defense industrial cooperation and produce new innovations in technology and manufacturing.

"We're eager to work alongside you to realize our shared goals," Hegseth said. "They're deep and ongoing."

Jaishankar said India's relationship with the U.S. is already strong, but more can be done.

"We believe that our defense partnership is today truly one of the most consequential pillars of the relationship. It's not built merely on shared interests, but we believe really deepening convergence and of capabilities, of responsibilities," Jaishankar said. "And what we do in the Indo-Pacific, we believe, is absolutely crucial to its strategic stability."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top