Information , Ideas , Post Mortems & Other Trivia .

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x


which is a bad idea bcz the Indian people may not want it (ie blob has to use undemocratic means then) and even if they win, their preferred ideology and the people they intend to use for it wont be able to do the job..

This guy gets something that we don't discuss here enough

What happens if their regime change succeeds?

Will a Khichdi opposition be suitable to their goals of turning India into a compliant, slave version of China?

Will they able to remote control a nation of 1.4 billion from Washington DC like their predecessors did from London 70+ years ago?

Will all go according to plan, what happens if it doesn't, what happens if "China's Ukraine" self-combusts?

Like Assad was to go and Syria was to be taken over by another regime, but then you had ISIS and Kurds.
Hosni Mubarak was to go and MB govt would be the pet dogs of the West but what happened in reality?
Was Libya intended to be turned into an unstable shithole and locus of modern slave trade after Gaddafi was removed?
 

View: https://twitter.com/HearthHellenism/status/1868497583586627771?s=19

“Modern people, even those who happen to be religiously observant, struggle to appreciate what it means for an entire society to inhabit world which is pervaded by invisible supernatural forces and populated by gods and spirits; and in which the very fabric of time and space is marked and divided by sacred places and rituals. There is another reason too for the gap in comprehension.

Ancient paganism amounted to a way of being religious which in crucial ways does not fit with Christian assumptions; and those assumptions have to a large extent passed unchallenged into the post-Christian worldview, colouring the very essence of what we might perceive religion to be.

Classical paganism was first and foremost a religion of tradition. Its practices and beliefs were handed down from generation to generation like to many cultural heirlooms. The individual did not practise their religion primarily because they were persuaded in their mind that its metaphysical claims were true, but because their parents and ancestors had done so since time immemorial. The emphasis was on performing the prescribed sacrifices and attending the customary festivals rather than on being taught from a catechism or believing in a creed. As the early modern French intellectual Bernard de Fontenelle put it, the rule was: 'Do what the others do, and believe what you wish'.

Put another way, Graeco-Roman paganism was a religion, but it was not a confession, in the sense of a collection of dogmas requiring intellectual agreement or self-conscious assent. Belief formed part of ancient religion in the trivial sense that the ancient Greek and Romans believed (probably, in most cases) that the gods to whom they performed rituals existed. But they did not believe, as Christians and Muslims later did, that correct religious belief was essential to their eternal spiritual destiny, or that the content of their beliefs needed to be strictly orthodox." They had a 'noncompulsory theology, over which not a single religious war was ever fought.”

Paganism Persisting : A History of European Paganisms Since Antiquity

Robin Douglas & Francis Young
 
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top