Israel x Iran Conflict (93 Viewers)

hit&run said:
Well done, Israel.

Israel met its objective. Iran's nuclear weapons program is now dead.

Iranian response was typical of a contemporary age nation that has conventional ballistic missiles and long-range rockets. Though their precision has improved but it hardly deters Israel.
Click to expand...
now its time for narendra buddha ji :dharma: to denuclearise our porki neighbour, maybe israel can misfire some of its missiles into porkiland
 
TopWatcher said:
I read somewhere goi places a condition for starlink, a master access to shutoff internet over India.
Click to expand...

Yes that different than the private provider being used by the US to turn off internet.

Azaad said:
I don't think you've understood the game at all.


Iran is proceeding on course to enrich uranium & make a NW . What this act may do is force Iran to come into the open by testing a N bomb.

That in turn opens up a Pandora's box for both KSA & UAE have sworn if Iran got a NW, they'd do so too even if it involves moving heaven & earth. Enter Paxtan.Then there's Turkey with similar intentions.

Now do you want me to write the rest of the equation out or with your extremely limited intellect can you infer where this is going?


In that case explain Operation Sindoor to me please.

Weakening Israel is a precursor to its elimination. It simply lacks the population or strategic depth to be resilient. Their enemies have to get lucky just once whereas Israel has to be lucky every goddamned time.

Ever wondered why they're so aggressive or pro active? Now you know.

Iran has to be de nuclearised. No two opinions about it. Only points of debate is how is this accomplished. That's the opposite of status quo.


In case intelligent you hasn't noticed , there are no ICE 2 wheelers in China. They'd probably go 100% EV by the end of this decade & if not then by mid next decade. How long in your estimate would it take India to get there?

What's Iran & all those gulf Sheikhdoms going to do with their reserves of oil then with or without the US security umbrella ? Have you ever wondered why the US isn't as interested in the ME like it used to be? Well now you know.


Scroll up.


Neutrality in diplomatic terms is the absence of enmity. If common interests exist & values shared it can graduate to friendship especially if the threats are common.

Now apply this yardstick to measure where Israel stands vis a vis India as compared to any other ME nation or even beyond this region .

How old are you? Your bio mentions you're 41. It's a genuine question.
Click to expand...

You repeat the same stuff without actually responding with anything substantial.

I don't care much about nuke proliferation. Both our enemies have nukes. What difference does it make for us if Iran get nukes when Porkies already do?

Are you a Israeli that you care about Israel so much? I don't. Your arguments are Israeli centric not Indian.

EVs replacing ICs are a pipedream. They have many challenges and won't be replacing IC anytime soon, particularly heavy machinery. Open up a separate thread about it to discuss further.

What percentage of our energy requirements are met by oil? How about a decade later?

It dumb to argue that oil is not going to important for the foreseeable future.

You want a US controlled Iran. You must also want us to buy US weapons.

Why do you want US to control and an important oil source for us? That's blatantly anti Indian.

Make arguments and not adhomenin attacks.
 
Last edited:
Nicky said:
My point is the status quo as it stands today is better for India than any other outcome of either side having a decisive victory
Click to expand...
Status quo is Iran advancing their nuclear program. That's not good for India.
Nicky said:
How is an Iran controlled by US better for us?
Click to expand...
Iran won't have access to nukes. That's one benefit, not that I'm advocating for a US controlled Iran.
 
Nicky said:
Yes that different than the private provider being used by the US to turn off internet.



You repeat the same stuff without actually responding with anything substantial.

I don't care much about nuke proliferation. Both our enemies have nukes. What difference does it make for us if Iran get nukes if Porkies already do?

Are you a Israeli that you care about Israel so much? I don't. Your arguments are Israeli centric not Indian.

EVs are a pipedream. They have many challenges and won't be replacing IC anytime soon, particularly heavy machinery. Open up a separate thread about it to discuss further.

You want a US controlled Iran. You must also want is to buy US weapons.

How old are you since you argue like a teenager.
Click to expand...
Are you aware of The Great Game? If yes, then you would have a different take on this issue.

Obviously, it has nothing to do with the Israel-Iran war, but rather with how far Indians can think.
 
One can understand that Indians will play the symbolic diplomatic game, and it may yaw a bit towards Iran but if there are sensible people in our establishment, then they will tell Modi and his successor to overtly or covertly not let Iran become a nuclear weapon state.
 
hit&run said:
Are you aware of The Great Game? If yes, then you would have a different take on this issue.

Obviously, it has nothing to do with the Israel-Iran war, but rather with how far Indians can think.
Click to expand...

There are many different versions of it. I don't know which one you are referring to. Expand and I can respond.
 
@neelaslayer chainposting mat kar, ek admin hai jo belt se maarta hai, maine khaya hai
 
Physx32 said:
Status quo is Iran advancing their nuclear program. That's not good for India.

Iran won't have access to nukes. That's one benefit, not that I'm advocating for a US controlled Iran.
Click to expand...

Iran has been trying for decades. What makes you beleive they are close? It's just an Israeli justification for war.

When Porkies and Chini have nukes, how does Iran having them make much difference?
 
Nicky said:
Iran has been trying for decades. What makes you beleive they are close? It's just an Israeli justification for war.

When Porkies and Chini have nukes, how does Iran having them make much difference?
Click to expand...
because iran is kattar !ssl@mic mullah dicktatorship, crazy dictator. they will do anything to wipeout kafirs. nukes in the hand of p!sslamic nations is dangerous. they are a timebomb for humanity and mother earth
 
Nicky said:
There are many different versions of it. I don't know which one you are referring to. Expand and I can respond.
Click to expand...
The "Great Game" refers to the 19th-century geopolitical rivalry between the British and Russian empires for influence and control in Central Asia, particularly in regions like Afghanistan, Persia, and the areas around the Indian subcontinent. The term was popularized by Rudyard Kipling's novel Kim and encapsulates the strategic maneuvering, espionage, and proxy conflicts as both powers sought to expand their empires and secure their interests.
Key aspects:
  • Time Period: Roughly 1813 to 1907, ending with the Anglo-Russian Convention.
  • Objective: Britain aimed to protect its Indian colony from Russian expansion, while Russia sought access to warm-water ports and influence in Central Asia.
  • Methods: Diplomacy, military expeditions, intelligence operations, and influence over local rulers.
  • Key Regions: Afghanistan, Persia (Iran), Tibet, and the Central Asian khanates (e.g., Bukhara, Khiva).
  • Outcome: The rivalry eased with the 1907 agreement, which defined spheres of influence, though tensions persisted.
Click to expand...
 
liberalredditor said:
because iran is kattar !ssl@mic mullah dicktatorship, crazy dictator. they will do anything to wipeout kafirs. nukes in the hand of p!sslamic nations is dangerous. they are a timebomb for humanity and mother earth
Click to expand...

We already have that with Porkies. My question was why is Iran having nukes much worse for us when both our enemies have them.

Porki jehadis having nukes didn't bother Israel.

This seems more like a Israeli talking point.

Any jehadi having nukes is bad but one more getting it won't make much difference to us.
 
p
Nicky said:
We already have that with Porkies. My question was why is Iran having nukes much worse for us when both our enemies have them.

Porki jehadis having nukes didn't bother Israel.

This seems more like a Israeli talking point.

Any jehadi having nukes is bad but one more getting it won't make much difference to us.
Click to expand...
porks are kept under control by burgers and chowmeins
 
Corvus Splendens said:

View: https://x.com/OsintUpdates/status/1933846254238548232

View: https://x.com/OsintUpdates/status/1933840211936530517
Click to expand...


Good for oil prices, bad for us.

Perhaps Israeli lovers can explain how raising oil prices due to their targeting of oil field is good for us.

liberalredditor said:
p

porks are kept under control by burgers and chowmeins
Click to expand...

And the same burgers will wipe Iran off before they can fire nukes at Israel.

Again no worse for us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 9 more.
    • Total: 89 (members: 33, guests: 56)

    Similar threads

    Unknowncommando
    Israel Defense Forces (IDF)
    2
    Replies
    29
    Views
    725
    chnvipgz
    C
    sameer
    • Sticky
    Israel Iranian proxy Conflicts
    13 14 15
    Replies
    282
    Views
    15K
    Corvus Splendens
    Corvus Splendens
    Corvus Splendens
    • Sticky
    Israel - Hamas Conflict
    21 22 23
    Replies
    454
    Views
    29K
    Freedom Thru Firepower
    Freedom Thru Firepower
    haldilal
    Israel Arab Conflicts
    2 3
    Replies
    58
    Views
    4K
    Bleh
    Bleh
    SKC
    Iran Watch
    Replies
    12
    Views
    284
    rock127
    rock127

    Latest Replies

    Featured Content

    Trending Threads

    Share this Site

    Back
    Top