Israel x Iran Conflict (53 Viewers)

[Cheepek]

we get to see why U.S DoD invests so much in making sure iran does not go nuclear.
in eurasia, if iran goes nuclear it becomes a almost full circle of contiguous nuclear armed states.

View attachment 40634

View attachment 40635
note : apologies for the improper India map.

Exactly, 5 nuclear states in Asia alone, 2 with crazy Islamists- a powder keg for the future.

 

[KumaoniReborn]

A country which has attacked 2 nations in the 21st century, one almost entirely unprovoked, is giving gyaan on who can or can’t have nuclear weapons

 

[KumaoniReborn]

A country which has attacked 2 nations in the 21st century, one almost entirely unprovoked, is giving gyaan on who can or can’t have nuclear weapons

Make that 3,

with two entirely unprovoked.

 

[spikey360]

A country which has attacked 2 nations in the 21st century, one almost entirely unprovoked, is giving gyaan on who can or can’t have nuclear weapons

In hindsight, maybe it was indeed the Iranians who tried to assassinate orange orangutan

 

[snakeeyes07]

View: https://x.com/1no_aalsi_/status/1936652415148888235

Good one

 

[Ajayant Tripathi]

Inadequate and thoroughly colour blind statement.
There are thousands of divisions in Islam. Instead of widening the crevasse, you are advocating we put them in one basket and strengthen it. We need a Shia bomb to counterbalanced a Sunni bomb. That's how you mind-fuck 2 billion people into proving the superiority of their own tribe and dissuade them from going all out against non believer tribes.
Look at how we are perfectly ok with the Taliban in Afghanistan. They are pliable and they need money. They condemn Pahalgam, they condemn Pakistan, they give anal treatment to Pakistan in NWFP whenever required. You are telling me all this leverage is worth nothing and we are wasting our money building schools, dams and libraries in Afghanistan and airlifting rice and medicines for them?

Hmmm. Let me check if the mullah sponsored any Shia group in pakistan?? It seems No. They have been conduit of some transactions. Its just that. You are overestimating the hand of Mullah.
A new regime will actually be more beneficial if not favorable to us.
Its like thinking the american sponsored afghan govt. was more beneficial to us. But come time taliban actually have been of more practical use to us.

As for domestic muslims, it's a law and order problem involving compromised politicians. No point blaming Iranians, Pakistanis and Afghanistan.

Now, No, Its not only local law and order problem. Local police may apprehend the criminals, may even contain their damage. But local police do not have resources to combat radicalism. Its like moping when the tap is running. You first close the tap than sweep and mop the water.

 

[KumaoniReborn]

Hmmm. Let me check if the mullah sponsored any Shia group in pakistan?? It seems No. They have been conduit of some transactions. Its just that. You are overestimating the hand of Mullah.
A new regime will actually be more beneficial if not favorable to us.

Now, No, Its not only local law and order problem. Local police may apprehend the criminals, may even contain their damage. But local police do not have resources to combat radicalism. Its like moping when the tap is running. You first close the tap than sweep and mop the water.

LOL a new regime would turn into a pro U.S. puppet, then the same would happen inPakistan and have you the U.S.-Pak- China front all over again.

 

[officewarrior]

There has to be some sort of research going on like anti nuclear device which can prevent nuclear atoms to undergo fission or fusion reaction for the bomb to work i think i have read somewhere sweden is working on it.
It is some sort of anti nuclear umbrella which gives radiation which prevents nuclear reactions very early stage technology but it will be a must in future survival.

I wonder if india has any such program??

 

[KumaoniReborn]

What am I talking

Pakistan is already pro US

a new regime in Iran would give Pak a direct supplier of arms

 

[Nicky]

What am I talking

Pakistan is already pro US

a new regime in Iran would give Pak a direct supplier of arms

Unfortunately this forum is filled with Israeli fanboys who don't realise what an Iran under burger munchers means for us.

More hints that nothing nuclear was actually hit.


View: https://x.com/RT_com/status/1936659487601074420?t=NdcFOBGtnPeLk0_7GPQe5A&s=19

 

[Drwho]

LOL a new regime would turn into a pro U.S. puppet, then the same would happen inPakistan and have you the U.S.-Pak- China front all over again.

That can actually help Pakistan being dalla in middle of USA china. They both need a bi@tch to send message across.
It can hamper our own issues. I mean it happened earlier as well. Just see Pakistan can buy any weapon from china or USA. Infect get it for free against india.
But even if we try to buy s400 from Russia with real money . Everyone had issues.
Some random American army guy has audacity to say these things on our prime time new’s channels. While we keep quiet.

Oh koi nahi Muslims to nahi hai ye.

A pro USA Govt in Iran will be very serious problem for us. They will be far worst. Since Pakistan Iran relationship will be based on USA interest.

 

[KumaoniReborn]

Unfortunately this forum is filled with Israeli fanboys who don't realise what an Iran under burger munchers means for us.

More hints that nothing nuclear was actually hit.


View: https://x.com/RT_com/status/1936659487601074420?t=NdcFOBGtnPeLk0_7GPQe5A&s=19

People need to think above Hindu Muslim for geopolitics.
The average citizen from all countries have the same view on India, personal opinions and emotions don’t lead to geopolitical relationships. Indians are too emotional in this regard.

And yes, we’ve seen a pro USA iran before supply weapons to Pak in 65 and 71 wars

 

[Ajayant Tripathi]

LOL a new regime would turn into a pro U.S. puppet, then the same would happen inPakistan and have you the U.S.-Pak- China front all over again.

Too much hysteria.
Already we are under pressure. Porkies and Kanglus with internal snakes are more than sufficient for us. A pro west Iran is not going to build any more pressure on us. We already have more than enough pressure.

You have to calm down and look from Indian lens. India need that geography to do two things: Unlike Shah, deny military infrastructure to porkies in case of conflict with us and give us access to caspian and russia. Any new regime will do just that.
So, Its benefit India in end. The whole world is pro US in a sense. Even Russia can say we were pro US.

 

[Tsunami]

It's not over yet.... initial bombings by air power are always showing west victory. Afganistan had nothing no airforce no effective AD and no ballistic missiles.

Yet 20 years later Americans were running away like a scared little dogs.

There is no clarity if these strikes have achieved anything. Until Iranian regime falls it not a victory for Israel/US. Airpower won't achieve successful regime change.

I hope we don't see another radical nuclear state but it's not gonna be easy.

 

[KumaoniReborn]

Too much hysteria.
Already we are under pressure. Porkies and Kanglus with internal snakes are more than sufficient to us. A pro west Iran is not going to build any more pressure on us. We already have more than enough pressure.

You have to calm down and look from Indian lens. India need that geography to do two things: Unlike Shah, deny military infrastructure to porkies in case of conflict with us and give us access to caspian and russia. Any new regime will do just that.
So, Its benefit India in end. The whole world is pro US in a sense. Even Russia can say we were pro US.

Pro West Iran literally gives the United States a hub for controlling middle eastern funds. A Pro West Iran can turn into a direct arms supplier for Pakistan. A Probwest Iran will also hinder the Taliban in the amount of ass fucking it can do to Pakistan via TTP.

 

[Ajayant Tripathi]

Arey they were only anti India cuz they were part of CENTO with US and Pak.

It was only under mullah regime we got closer tho surprisingly

Mullah had compulsions. It burnt bridges with west. So, they traded with us. If they were so considerate of India and had such good relationships with us they would not be speaking on Kashmir publicly.

It was pure geopolitical compulsion. New regime similarly will be much more beneficial to us. Times have changed.

 

[MasterChief]

Agree here..


View: https://x.com/MacaesBruno/status/1936573510928728516?t=uaAnNfX6uqo_T6_z6XDjIw&s=19

 

[Tsunami]

View: https://x.com/JaipurDialogues/status/1936670192865837317?t=m-PiW95vF-QnRPtiWvoipw&s=19

 

[Magadha Naresh]

What am I talking

Pakistan is already pro US

a new regime in Iran would give Pak a direct supplier of arms

People don't remember how propak last us puppet regime in usa was

 

[KumaoniReborn]

Mullah had compulsions. It burnt bridges with west. So, they traded with us. If they were so considerate of India and had such good relationships with us they would not be speaking on Kashmir publicly.

It was pure geopolitical compulsion. New regime similarly will be much more beneficial to us. Times have changed.

Taliban also speaks on Kashmir. Yet they still attack Pakistan.