ISRO - General Discussions

Varoon4 said:
^^^
It is those Western countries, particularly the English speaking ones, that are jealous, whiny and petty over India's achievements, because they haven't themseves done it. It is, barring the odd dissonant voice, not Mexico, Colombia, Congo, Philippines, Vietnam etc. Just to keep a,sense of perspective.
Click to expand...
He is referring to worst korea in this case.
 
SlayingHell said:
So, Iam seeing all these Weird Inferiority Complex laden bots from Not-so-Developed Space Industry peedling news like ISRO is only successful because labor is cheap. That's it. How much of this argument is bullshit? Like MOM, CHANDRAYAAN, ADITYA and all these are possible not because they are cheap. I acknowledge they are paid Not-So-Abundantly but they peddle these "Muh Cheap Labor" arguments as if we Intelligence and Quality of Labor doesn't matter.

I still couldn't understand how exactly having cheap labor attributes to success of various complex missions like Moon Landing? I mean if being Cheap resulted in such, we should see dozens of these countries do it isn't it?
Click to expand...
They will do, they not able to digest that India able to do these things.

Now, India becoming a needle for them.
 
Can someone here experienced in Launch Vehicles tell me why can't we attach 2 other Solid Rocket Boosters S-200 making LVM-3 Boosters totally 4 along with its First Stage with 4x Vikas Engines instead of 2. What would happen? It could serve as alternate until NGLV is ready and ofcourse the time has passed for that thought, since we are now focusing fully on Soorya, but why didn't ISRO took this route before this? What would the payload to LEO and GEO would be? Or doesn't it work at all?
 
SlayingHell said:
Can someone here experienced in Launch Vehicles tell me why can't we attach 2 other Solid Rocket Boosters S-200 making LVM-3 Boosters totally 4 along with its First Stage with 4x Vikas Engines instead of 2. What would happen? It could serve as alternate until NGLV is ready and ofcourse the time has passed for that thought, since we are now focusing fully on Soorya, but why didn't ISRO took this route before this? What would the payload to LEO and GEO would be? Or doesn't it work at all?
Click to expand...
4 large solid boosters in first stage will too complex to control

4 Vikas engines can be done, but it will take time, & NGLV will follow immediately, so it's not worth time & effort
 
SlayingHell said:
Can someone here experienced in Launch Vehicles tell me why can't we attach 2 other Solid Rocket Boosters S-200 making LVM-3 Boosters totally 4 along with its First Stage with 4x Vikas Engines instead of 2. What would happen? It could serve as alternate until NGLV is ready and ofcourse the time has passed for that thought, since we are now focusing fully on Soorya, but why didn't ISRO took this route before this? What would the payload to LEO and GEO would be? Or doesn't it work at all?
Click to expand...

The Vibrations and mechanical stresses generated due to the addition of two more 5000 kN SRB's would destroy the Rocket
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKC
SlayingHell said:
So, Iam seeing all these Weird Inferiority Complex laden bots from Not-so-Developed Space Industry peedling news like ISRO is only successful because labor is cheap. That's it. How much of this argument is bullshit? Like MOM, CHANDRAYAAN, ADITYA and all these are possible not because they are cheap. I acknowledge they are paid Not-So-Abundantly but they peddle these "Muh Cheap Labor" arguments as if we Intelligence and Quality of Labor doesn't matter.

I still couldn't understand how exactly having cheap labor attributes to success of various complex missions like Moon Landing? I mean if being Cheap resulted in such, we should see dozens of these countries do it isn't it?
Click to expand...
Screw them. If labour is cheap then Entire African continent will be pinnacle of science and Tech. Mofos should be shut their mouth and cope harder.



SlayingHell said:
Not britbongs, but a certain plastic obsessed country, where they inserted in every paragraph that it succeeded because of availability of "Muh Cheap labor" and not on Intellectual Potential. If these butthurt said "Well, these people poured billions and hence they could accomplish this" then that makes atleast a sense, but I could never ever comprehend how is landing on moon is tied to cheap labor and low salaries? Afterall Salaries is just a matter of convenience than can be increased with just a signature, where as even if you pour billions in certain kind of countries they couldn't manufacture a bike much less a moon rover.

I thought maybe I missed any reasons of this Cheap Labor rhetoric and hence asked here.
Click to expand...


Plastic obsessed country - South Korea.

With shit tier TFR and an being an bitch to daddy America for 70 years. they should simply worry about their KPOP stars and viral fan wars.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FalconSlayers
ISRO's Rendezvous, Space docking and Berthing Experiment
Replies
6
Views
92
Indx TechStyle
Indx TechStyle
haldilal
JAXA-ISRO Lunar Polar Exploration (LUPEX) Mission
Replies
2
Views
75
haldilal
haldilal
SKC
NISAR - NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar Mission
2
Replies
25
Views
528
lexCommando
lexCommando
haldilal
  • Sticky
ISRO Project Surya: Next Generation Launch Vehicle (NGLV)
2 3 4
Replies
70
Views
4K
FalconSlayers
FalconSlayers
haldilal
Science & Technology in India General Discusion
Replies
4
Views
193
Varoon4
V

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top