Mainstream Media Watch in India : News & Discussions. (1 Viewer)

[Azaad]

View: https://twitter.com/sardesairajdeep/status/1670130163907174402?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/Saiarav/status/1670142978499969027?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/IbrahimMaliyam/status/1670342034841014272?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/Saiarav/status/1912003053315825825?s=19

The Srikrishna Commission which has painstakingly documented the entire Bombay riots episodes clearly notes that *both* the first and second phase of Bombay riots were triggered by major acts of Muslim violence. The first phase was triggered by muslim mob lynching to death of a Hindu policeman in the most brutal fashion. He was there just doing his duty policing a Muslim rally.

But I have not come across a single muslim who is aware of this basic fact. Reason? The likes of Rajdeep who dominated the media landscape then went out of their way to hide it and paint the poor Bombay Muslims as innocent victims of a violent Hindutva.

Once a cunt, always a cunt.

 

[Azaad]

View: https://twitter.com/jyotipunwani/status/1732686512595345597?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/Saiarav/status/1732775212746432955?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/Saiarav/status/1912026671462367716?s=19

I had a debate with a person named Jyoti Punwani on the facts of the Sri Krishna Commission report. The person was making an outright false claim that the report stated that Hindus started the riots in Bombay in 1992. But the report actually says the opposite. After I quoted from the report, she ran away from the debate.

Jyoti P is not some random person. She is one of the key activists wrt the Bombay riots masquerading as journo who actively contributed to building the fake narrative of Muslims being innocent victims of the riots. They could do this then because it was almost impossible for an average person to access the report. So if she claimed that the report said X, everyone just had to trust her. But their job of gaslighting has become way tougher now that anyone can download and read the report for themselves.

 

[FalconSlayers]

Why are these azzholes not arrested yet? This is the 2nd time they've done the mistake despite apologising for the first just today.

 

[ezsasa]

See this is what we need to learn... world media will pick your narrative if you give some official narrative.

They picked pakistan's narrative of Rafale down because PM and ISPR officially claimed it, even though every one knew it's false. On the other hand we destroyed multiple planes in air and on ground but never officially claimed anything.

However much credible world media is not going to report it because Shiv Aroor is saying something.

yes, news wire services and organisations do prioritise official statements more than unofficial source based statements.

yet there is an element of gate keeping that overrides official statements when editorial calls are taken by these organisations. there are things we can refer as victimhood ka hierarchy and target list ka hierarchy.

Victimhood ka hierarchy can present itself in following ways in globalist affiliated media houses:

between a man and a woman, woman is granted victimhood status.
between a white and a black person, black person is granted victimhood status.
between a christian and a muslim, muslim person is granted victimhood status.
between a jew and a muslim, muslim person is granted victimhood status.
between a hindu and a muslim, muslim person is granted victimhood status.
between a republican and a non-republican, non-republican is granted victimhood status.


target list ka hierarchy can present itself in following ways in globalist affiliated media houses:

between modi and trump, trump is higher on target list.
between democrat and republican, republican is higher on target list.
between India and pakistan, India is higher on target list.
between iran and ukraine, iran is higher on target list.

this time we found out that between J-10/JF-17 and rafale, rafale was higher on target list.

ultimately whose narrative gets amplified, is decided by gate keepers based on their own priority lists.

 

[Tsunami]

yes, news wire services and organisations do prioritise official statements more than unofficial source based statements.

yet there is an element of gate keeping that overrides official statements when editorial calls are taken by these organisations. there are things we can refer as victimhood ka hierarchy and target list ka hierarchy.

Victimhood ka hierarchy can present itself in following ways in globalist affiliated media houses:

between a man and a woman, woman is granted victimhood status.
between a white and a black person, black person is granted victimhood status.
between a christian and a muslim, muslim person is granted victimhood status.
between a jew and a muslim, muslim person is granted victimhood status.
between a hindu and a muslim, muslim person is granted victimhood status.
between a republican and a non-republican, non-republican is granted victimhood status.


target list ka hierarchy can present itself in following ways in globalist affiliated media houses:

between modi and trump, trump is higher on target list.
between democrat and republican, republican is higher on target list.
between India and pakistan, India is higher on target list.
between iran and ukraine, iran is higher on target list.

this time we found out that between J-10/JF-17 and rafale, rafale was higher on target list.

ultimately whose narrative gets amplified, is decided by gate keepers based on their own priority lists.

I understand they have clear bias.

But still problem is media reports will cover our side if we categorically deny any claim of Rafael down if we had made any such statement. But all we did every time is "Losses are not important"

Also we never clearly claimed PAF fighter getting shot down.

World media had to cover our claim F-16 shot down by Mig-21 in 2021 despite having biases.

Yes our side of the story will not be amplified like Pakistan's but we do need to make our side of the story clear.

 

[Hari Sud]

India and the Western Media’s Bias

India must adopt a tougher stance against the persistent bias and propaganda of the Western media. “Enough is enough” should now be the guiding principle.

At Churchill’s advice during India’s independence struggle, Western media narratives—often subtly guided by old colonial instincts—have consistently sought to diminish India’s global standing while elevating Pakistan beyond its merit. For decades, they’ve mocked or minimized India’s successes, while offering uncritical sympathy to Pakistan.

Whether it was the Kashmir issue, the 1971 East Pakistan war, water-sharing disputes, or the recent Operation Sindoor, Western outlets have routinely chosen to amplify Pakistan’s narrative. For instance, they unquestioningly echoed false claims about Rafale jets being shot down by Chinese-made PL-15 missiles—ignoring the fact that Pakistan suffered a humiliating defeat.
India cannot allow such distortions to go unchallenged any longer. Corrective measures are urgently needed:

Establish a Global-Scale Indian News Network: Create a world-class news service to rival BBC and major U.S. outlets.

Expand International Media Presence: Launch Indian TV news channels in every major country to broadcast India’s perspective.

Deny Access to Hostile Reporters: Eject openly biased or anti-India journalists, such as those endorsed by publications like The New York Times, which have pushed for anti-Modi voices under the guise of press freedom.

Demand Accountability: Any journalist publishing unverified or malicious stories—especially from anonymous sources—must face consequences. No more excuses.

Build a Counter-Propaganda Force: Deploy Indian-funded media correspondents in Western countries to challenge and expose anti-India narratives directly at the source.

All these actions should be made public. Western outlets must be put on notice: deliberate misreporting and sustained bias against India will no longer go unanswered.

India is a proud and rising nation—and it will not tolerate being misrepresented any longer.