Naxal Maoist Insurgency

I still don’t get it—every time these Reddit folks come out with "muh tribal rights" whenever Maoists are killed. Are these people deliberately being ignorant, or do they genuinely lack any sense? These are the same people who cry "muh constitution in danger" yet ignore that the constitution doesn’t allow armed insurgency, no matter the grievance. Nowhere does it say that picking up arms against the state is justified. And what’s with this "muh tribal land" narrative?
it's political advocacy, right or wrong doesn't matter here, it's a belief system.
ultimately what matters is, whose belief system is larger and stronger.

presumption of moral superiority over others is a strong motivating factor in ideological and political battles.

there is a reason why, commie influenced intellectuals and journos, focus so much on narratives which creating doubts in the minds of Indians. the side which is confused about what they want, ultimately loses.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top