Operation Sindoor and Aftermath

[FalconSlayers]

View: https://x.com/ani_digital/status/1927974812002972041

 

[Knowitall]

View: https://x.com/ani_digital/status/1927974812002972041

Nothing to brag about.

Just shows an utter disregard of geopolitics and the civilisational battle we face. What he and other members of the govt have done is commendable but they need to start setting up the narrative of pakistan being a garrison state that needs to go in its entirety.

We need to build up that seige mentality among hindus asap.

 

[Prasad]

Nothing to brag about.

Just shows an utter disregard of geopolitics and the civilisational battle we face. What he and other members of the govt have done is commendable but they need to start setting up the narrative of pakistan being a garrison state that needs to go in its entirety.

We need to build up that seige mentality among hindus asap.

That's a message for rest of the world.
Those who are smart and followed the whole thing know exactly what we did and how we went about it.

World on the other hand loves to hear worlds like 'restraint' 'peace' etc etc, for obvious reasons.

There is political talk, diplomat talk and there is actual work. All of them complement each other.
If you are wondering why this restraint, peace, not an era of war etc etc is awesome strategy, look at how we fked the naxals without a peep from anyone in the world.
Or for that matter the increased number of bangladeshis being dumped.

Talking soft and holding a big stick is a time tested strategy.

 

[Anants]

That's a message for rest of the world.
Those who are smart and followed the whole thing know exactly what we did and how we went about it.

World on the other hand loves to hear worlds like 'restraint' 'peace' etc etc, for obvious reasons.

We have been showing restraints since 47 in every conflict. Whats new in the statement? Even geo political onlookers also know what extent are moves in a conflict and after conflict - political statements are going to be.

 

[Migflug]

Nothing to brag about.

Just shows an utter disregard of geopolitics and the civilisational battle we face. What he and other members of the govt have done is commendable but they need to start setting up the narrative of pakistan being a garrison state that needs to go in its entirety.

We need to build up that seige mentality among hindus asap.

We need to wait for 15 more years. Once we are of a sizable economic size and become the third pole of the world, we will have all the time in the world to take care of Pakistan the way we like.
In fact, for the next 20 years, we need to make sure of our economic growth while stalling the Pakistanis in different ways. Post that there will be no going back!

 

[The Juggernaut]

View: https://x.com/sidhant/status/1927967052049858573
One thing we need to be very clear, we don't want that muslim population of PoK, we are here for the land. I really hope kadi ninda is just bluffing here with all those love, unity nonsense.

Only 5 lakh are in Pok, also we will expelling everyone don't speak local languages like kashmiri, balti, wakhi etc.

Punjabi aur posto speaking will sent their state.

 

[concard]

We need to wait for 15 more years. Once we are of a sizable economic size and become the third pole of the world, we will have all the time in the world to take care of Pakistan the way we like.
In fact, for the next 20 years, we need to make sure of our economic growth while stalling the Pakistanis in different ways. Post that there will be no going back!

No need to wait for 15 years. We are not talking about a country which can churn out Jet Engines or War ships at a rapid rate every year. We are talking about a country with no expertise to even build a 70CC engine for their motorbikes used by their regular people. The world does not wait for 20 years for you and then gives you a carte blanche to take revenge on all the terrorist attacks they conducted on our soil in the previous years.

I am not saying we should go for all out war. All we need is to accelerate the process of destruction of abomination called Pakistan through all means necessary. We should not be afraid to go for preemptive strikes. When we go for revenge it has to be massive. This time we were sure measured and accurate. But we need to pack more punch to send a message to their elite scum that we have the capability to turn their land into rubble. Our military is not for show, we have to use it when we have to.

 

[Waanar]

We need to wait for 15 more years. Once we are of a sizable economic size and become the third pole of the world, we will have all the time in the world to take care of Pakistan the way we like.
In fact, for the next 20 years, we need to make sure of our economic growth while stalling the Pakistanis in different ways. Post that there will be no going back!

No one will become the third pole of the world if they get pushed around by Somalia tier countries.

US didn't, China didn't, USSR didn't. Not one country became a significant player by ignoring it's safety. In fact, a country's rise is usually marked by a couple of bloody battles to put it's neighborhood in order.

This 10 trillion economy line is pushed by fifth columnists to keep postponing a proper response against Pakistan and give it a breather and unfortunately, people fall for it.

India has grown inspite of it's pacifist approach, not because of it.

If India dealt with NE insurgents, Naxals and Pakistan the way she should, our economic progress would be stronger.

Can you imagine how helpful a land route to Central Asia will be if we carve a way through PoK?

All of this bandar naach of Chahabar port and the following panic when Iran is under threat of attack by US can be avoided with redundancy through a free Balochistan.

You put your economy in order by bettering your security and destroying other's, not the other way around. History is full of examples of rich kingdoms falling to savages because they valued prosperity over maar kaat.

 

[Prasad]

We have been showing restraints since 47 in every conflict. Whats new in the statement? Even geo political onlookers also know what extent are moves in a conflict and after conflict - political statements are going to be.

Are we showing restraint now?
We are not.

That's just word salad for rest of the world.

 

[Anants]

Are we showing restraint now?
We are not.

That's just word salad for rest of the world.

Actually we did show restraint. When we launched attack at their bases, it was show of intent capability but what should have been done in that window was delivering big blow - that allows India breather for next 5 years. Which means some of the military ammo dumps should have been targeted also. Next 5 years so that Pakistan spends its forex on rebuilding and replenishment and not on building further. But hindsight is 20/20.

One can be rest assured of one thing. Op Sindoor happened because trump was there. If Demos were there, our response would have been muted. And on the basis of that we may not get similar window of opportunity to pummel Pakistan capabilities to decade back again soon.

 

[Prasad]

Actually we did show restraint. When we launched attack at their bases, it was show of intent capability but what should have been done in that window was delivering big blow - that allows India breather for next 5 years. Which means some of the military ammo dumps should have been targeted also. Next 5 years so that Pakistan spends its forex on rebuilding and replenishment and not on building further. But hindsight is 20/20.

One can be rest assured of one thing. Op Sindoor happened because trump was there. If Demos were there, our response would have been muted. And on the basis of that we may not get similar window of opportunity to pummel Pakistan capabilities to decade back again soon.

During the initial discussions on what our response would be, the decision we reached in this forum was that we will hit terrorists, openly, publicly and with proof.

But, we escalated it to hitting their bases with impunity over the next few days. That was beyond what we had initially thought our response would be.

I agree with how pressure from US played a part. That is expected part and parcel of the dynamics at play.
point though is, our base line response to any future terrorist attack is now firmly established. This was not the case pre 2014.

That is the paradigm shift.

 

[Anants]

During the initial discussions on what our response would be, the decision we reached in this forum was that we will hit terrorists, openly, publicly and with proof.

But, we escalated it to hitting their bases with impunity over the next few days. That was beyond what we had initially thought our response would be.

I agree with how pressure from US played a part. That is expected part and parcel of the dynamics at play.
point though is, our base line response to any future terrorist attack is now firmly established. This was not the case pre 2014.

That is the paradigm shift.

This is being called a paradigm shift, but let’s be honest—it’s at least 20 years overdue. And even now, it’s not enough. I agree that, just like the GoI, many members on this forum also lacked a broader vision. But the problem at DFB wasn’t a lack of imagination — it was that our expectations were shaped by how slowly and cautiously we've responded to challenges over the past decades.

We also seriously underestimated Pakistan’s ability to keep itself afloat, thanks to support from its "four fathers." One major surprise was Trump siding with Pakistan, especially after the Houston event (Howdy Modi). That must’ve felt like a betrayal on the level of the Lahore Declaration for Modi.

The big takeaway? Never put all your diplomatic eggs in the basket of just one political party in the U.S.

 

[Corvus Splendens]

 

[Prasad]

This is being called a paradigm shift, but let’s be honest—it’s at least 20 years overdue. And even now, it’s not enough. I agree that, just like the GoI, many members on this forum also lacked a broader vision. But the problem wasn’t a lack of imagination — it was that our expectations were shaped by how slowly and cautiously we've responded to challenges over the past decade.

We also seriously underestimated Pakistan’s ability to keep itself afloat, thanks to support from its "four fathers." One major surprise was Trump siding with Pakistan, especially after the Houston event (Howdy Modi). That must’ve felt like a betrayal on the level of the Lahore Declaration for Modi.

The big takeaway? Never put all your diplomatic eggs in the basket of just one political party in the U.S.

Agree to that.
Imagine if our leaders had similar spine since independence.

regarding Trump, he seems to have gotten a very good personal deal from Pakis.
He will surely get message from our end in a nice way as well.

 

[Master of Indus]

This is being called a paradigm shift, but let’s be honest—it’s at least 20 years overdue. And even now, it’s not enough. I agree that, just like the GoI, many members on this forum also lacked a broader vision. But the problem wasn’t a lack of imagination — it was that our expectations were shaped by how slowly and cautiously we've responded to challenges over the past decade.

We also seriously underestimated Pakistan’s ability to keep itself afloat, thanks to support from its "four fathers." One major surprise was Trump siding with Pakistan, especially after the Houston event (Howdy Modi). That must’ve felt like a betrayal on the level of the Lahore Declaration for Modi.

The big takeaway? Never put all your diplomatic eggs in the basket of just one political party in the U.S.

We've had excellent relationship with Biden, a lot of people miss this. Also, it was Democrats who supported Bibi to burn down Hamas, same goes for pakistan, internally they don't like sly punjabi army/islamists, US has the pakistani army crooks by the balls, most of their families are settled in western sphere.

You have to understand pakistan army is a mercenary army, working for anyone who pays them dollars. Their generals are so corrupt that their corruption is taken as joke in pakistan (as if the jihadi uneducated awam can do anything about it).

 

[Anants]

We've had excellent relationship with Biden, a lot of people miss this. Also, it was Democrats who supported Bibi to burn down Hamas, same goes for pakistan, internally they don't like sly punjabi army/islamists, US has the pakistani army crooks by the balls, most of their families are settled in western sphere.

Not really. We absorbed many attacks and yet did not respond overtly (covertly maybe) to Pak. And Demos tried to arm twist and stumble GoI many times. Infact this first thing allegedly complained to trump after he became prez.

 

[Master of Indus]

Not really. We absorbed many attacks and yet did not respond overtly (covertly maybe) to Pak. And Demos tried to arm twist and stumble GoI many times. Infact this first thing allegedly complained to trump after he became prez.

I think you are confusing specifically Biden administration with low calibre American wokes running paid campaigns for islamists. Leave the university professors from obscure courses and their unemployable students protesting day in day out, NGOs etc; we got a lot of deals and military assistance from the Dems.

 

[Anants]

I think you are confusing specifically Biden administration with low calibre American wokes running paid campaigns for islamists. Leave the university professors from obscure courses and their unemployable students protesting day in day out, NGOs etc; we got a lot of deals and military assistance from the Dems.

The entities you just listed are just tools of DS who commandeered Biden

 

[Physx32]

Are we showing restraint now?
We are not.

That's just word salad for rest of the world.

Yes, we're showing restraint. We're showing extreme restraint since the first night of the operation.

 

[ashiii]

in Short "Dhone ko pani nahi hea"


View: https://twitter.com/ThePulseIndia/status/1927975196973027479

in next 10 years, pure pakitsan ka yahi haal hoga (conditions apply - if Pakistan exists by than)