GoI se lo na PaisaBro it isn't really a PSU issue though. It's IAF being kanjoos in case of AWACS. Radars to kabke bane pade hai. Cost negotiation ka drama chal raha IAF + DRDO vs Airbus. So it's Airbus being more greedy vs IAF being economical cuz they have limited budget.
You don't need a Crane and Cordon to retrieve a Drone Wreckage at BathindaSome aircraft were lost; they may not necessarily have been fighter jets—they could have been drones as well.
Point is better get your act togetherWhat is your point crybaby?
Keep coping mate.Ok i will get my act together crybaby.
While I agree that this government is not good at narrative warfare. The latter part is a such nice joke. They literally had one of the worst foreign policy, and India's international narrative was non-existent. Literally they were blaming RSS for 26/11 remember? And playing brochure brochure with Pakistan & US?That CDS interview once again re-inforces the fact this current government is the worst ever Indian govt. when it comes to global narrative management . Congress was much better at these things.
Losing fighter jets, tanks, or artillery—while unfortunate—is not the ultimate concern in warfare. If the loss of such equipment were a decisive factor, no country would ever go to war. What truly matters is achieving strategic and national objectives. U.S. Air Force, has lost fighter jets in various operations around the world, that has never deterred it from pursuing military goals. what India accomplished in the 1971 war was far more significant than the loss of a few fighter jets or tanks. Recapturing Kargil in 1999 was a critical national objective, and that success far outweighed the loss of a MiG-21.Stop Coping mate
You don't need a Crane and Cordon to retrieve a Drone Wreckage at Bathinda
3 Jets is minimum ( Tom Cooper thinks it might be more than 4 )
Congress-led governments never gave a military responses to Pakistan, even after multiple terrorist attacks across India. In contrast, the current government has taken decisive action to hold Pakistan accountable for each terrorist attack. Questions about how many fighter jets, drones, tanks, or artillery are lost will always come up in any conflict—but that doesn’t mean you stop fighting. National security and deterrence require a strong and clear response.While I agree that this government is not good at narrative warfare. The latter parg is a such nice joke. They literally had one of the worst foreign policy, and India's international narrative was non-existent. Literally they were blaming RSS for 26/11 remember? And playing brochure brochure with Pakistan & US?
So HQ-9 is best? It downed 6 rafales of India? What are you on? Same HQ-9 which got saturated by bunch of banshee decoys and loitering munitions. People calling it sh*t aren't calling it sh*t without a reason.Keep coping mate.
Ya , Chinese maal is shit
Josh is High sir
In a prolonged war like Kargil or 1971 it doesn't matterLosing fighter jets, tanks, or artillery—while unfortunate—is not the ultimate concern in warfare. If the loss of such equipment were a decisive factor, no country would ever go to war. What truly matters is achieving strategic and national objectives. U.S. Air Force, has lost fighter jets in various operations around the world, that has never deterred it from pursuing military goals. what India accomplished in the 1971 war was far more significant than the loss of a few fighter jets or tanks. Recapturing Kargil in 1999 was a critical national objective, and that success far outweighed the loss of a MiG-21.
Not every weapon will be shitSo HQ-9 is best? It downed 6 rafales of India? What are you on? Same HQ-9 which got saturated by bunch of banshee decoys and loitering munitions. People calling it sh*t aren't calling it sh*t without a reason.
There’s no denying that Chinese maal is inferior in quality—that’s a widely recognized fact around the world. However, that doesn’t mean India should take its security lightly or avoid preparing for a two-front war. Regardless of the quality of Chinese maal, India must stay fully prepared and vigilant.Keep coping mate.
Ya , Chinese maal is shit
Josh is High sir
What a moron .. Pakis using Terror against India, without serious repercussions is a cause of pride.. ? Countries use any tool they have to hurt enemy.. and Pakistan is using terror.. That India let it use it until Operation Sindoor is a disgrace..What was the GDP ratio between Al-Qaida and US when Laden took down the twin towers?
Why do you depress yourself over stupid things?
Pakis using terrorism against us should be a cause of pride, not cause of frustration. They are reduced to using terrorism against us because they are too coward to hit us conventionally. Their armed forces don't have any balls to attack india, so they brainwash kids in madarssa and send them across to blow themselves up.
That's typical Paki behaviour. How are you gonna change that? Even if India had blown up Karachi they would have found ways to cope with their cooked of claims of blowing x, y & z airbase of India, S-400, etc. Why do you care so much about what paki thinks? They lost half of their country in 71 and still claimed victory for years.In a prolonged war like Kargil or 1971 it doesn't matter
In a skirmish like Balakote and Sindoor it becomes a point of optics
How the Pakis tricked the narrative in Balakote
Now they have a Rafale as a "War Trophy to chest thump "
They look for winning optics like S400 , Vikrant
India knowingly allowed them a Rafale kill a gun walking into a well