Operation Sindoor and Aftermath

[Nibbler]

Also "rafales didn't have to be endangered" is a retarded line of thought.

There was a buildup post pahalgam. The only reason for loss is that the first strike was done without SEAD.

 

[Sickle_Cut]

Bro it isn't really a PSU issue though. It's IAF being kanjoos in case of AWACS. Radars to kabke bane pade hai. Cost negotiation ka drama chal raha IAF + DRDO vs Airbus. So it's Airbus being more greedy vs IAF being economical cuz they have limited budget.

GoI se lo na Paisa

What are Emergenecy Procuments meant for ?

AK203 or Patka

 

[Dhartiputra]

We met all our objectives in this strike — to pose a deterrent to Pakistan to not use state-crafted terror proxies in India — by striking from 7 May to 10 May. We will all see in the future how much this works, or whether they double down on terror.
The losses on our side present two different scenarios to us:
1. Pakistan’s technological gap with respect to India can be easily filled(to some extent) by our adversaries and admirers of the prostitute-state Pakistan.

2. A punitive strike in Pakistan without any losses on our side (on 7 May) could have put a major psychological and technological inferiority complex in the psyche of Pakistan.

Every war India has fought has given great lessons to Indian political and military leadership, but countermeasures regarding weaknesses are not up to the mark. Their laziness regarding national security is always on display in front of Indian citizens.

Members of DFI and DFB have more knowledge regarding India's national security readiness than most of the political and bureaucratic brass, and I fully agree with DFB members without getting losses or by avoiding losses on our side could have provided us more solid deterrent.

 

[Sickle_Cut]

Stop Coping mate

Some aircraft were lost; they may not necessarily have been fighter jets—they could have been drones as well.

You don't need a Crane and Cordon to retrieve a Drone Wreckage at Bathinda

3 Jets is minimum ( Tom Cooper thinks it might be more than 4 )

 

[Azaad]

View: https://x.com/Hardisohi/status/1928814773195493628

 

[Sickle_Cut]

What is your point crybaby?

Point is better get your act together

From being a pacifist and chalta hai attitude to prepare for eventuality.

Pakis are willing to do kamikaze attack on INS Vikrant like Houthis

They are nuts

Without muscle power, there is no point in being Supa Powa or Wish Guru

 

[shuturmurg]

That CDS interview once again re-inforces the fact this current government is the worst ever Indian govt. when it comes to global narrative management . Congress was much better at these things.

 

[Sickle_Cut]

Ok i will get my act together crybaby.

Keep coping mate.

Ya , Chinese maal is shit

Josh is High sir

 

[redpanda]

That CDS interview once again re-inforces the fact this current government is the worst ever Indian govt. when it comes to global narrative management . Congress was much better at these things.

While I agree that this government is not good at narrative warfare. The latter part is a such nice joke. They literally had one of the worst foreign policy, and India's international narrative was non-existent. Literally they were blaming RSS for 26/11 remember? And playing brochure brochure with Pakistan & US?

 

[Ajatshatru]

Stop Coping mate

You don't need a Crane and Cordon to retrieve a Drone Wreckage at Bathinda

3 Jets is minimum ( Tom Cooper thinks it might be more than 4 )

Losing fighter jets, tanks, or artillery—while unfortunate—is not the ultimate concern in warfare. If the loss of such equipment were a decisive factor, no country would ever go to war. What truly matters is achieving strategic and national objectives. U.S. Air Force, has lost fighter jets in various operations around the world, that has never deterred it from pursuing military goals. what India accomplished in the 1971 war was far more significant than the loss of a few fighter jets or tanks. Recapturing Kargil in 1999 was a critical national objective, and that success far outweighed the loss of a MiG-21.

 

[Ajatshatru]

While I agree that this government is not good at narrative warfare. The latter parg is a such nice joke. They literally had one of the worst foreign policy, and India's international narrative was non-existent. Literally they were blaming RSS for 26/11 remember? And playing brochure brochure with Pakistan & US?

Congress-led governments never gave a military responses to Pakistan, even after multiple terrorist attacks across India. In contrast, the current government has taken decisive action to hold Pakistan accountable for each terrorist attack. Questions about how many fighter jets, drones, tanks, or artillery are lost will always come up in any conflict—but that doesn’t mean you stop fighting. National security and deterrence require a strong and clear response.

 

[chnvipgz]

Where is mahatma modi why is he not answering as his friend rahul gandhi party is now asking questions.


View: https://x.com/ANI/status/1928760036408361383?t=OGEMTH0OTsaFRJCVVBUw8w&s=19

 

[redpanda]

Keep coping mate.

Ya , Chinese maal is shit

Josh is High sir

So HQ-9 is best? It downed 6 rafales of India? What are you on? Same HQ-9 which got saturated by bunch of banshee decoys and loitering munitions. People calling it sh*t aren't calling it sh*t without a reason.

 

[MasterChief]

Agree here with this anti BJP guy..
For all the hostility of BJP towards foreign media for biased coverage.. it still holds foreign media in very high esteem.. while Indian media treated like dirt


View: https://x.com/manaman_chhina/status/1928839668579078144?t=Q003mfPNsQgvfkcxt2RQ6A&s=19

 

[Sickle_Cut]

Losing fighter jets, tanks, or artillery—while unfortunate—is not the ultimate concern in warfare. If the loss of such equipment were a decisive factor, no country would ever go to war. What truly matters is achieving strategic and national objectives. U.S. Air Force, has lost fighter jets in various operations around the world, that has never deterred it from pursuing military goals. what India accomplished in the 1971 war was far more significant than the loss of a few fighter jets or tanks. Recapturing Kargil in 1999 was a critical national objective, and that success far outweighed the loss of a MiG-21.

In a prolonged war like Kargil or 1971 it doesn't matter

In a skirmish like Balakote and Sindoor it becomes a point of optics

How the Pakis tricked the narrative in Balakote

Now they have a Rafale as a "War Trophy to chest thump "

They look for winning optics like S400 , Vikrant

India knowingly allowed them a Rafale kill a gun walking into a well

 

[Sickle_Cut]

So HQ-9 is best? It downed 6 rafales of India? What are you on? Same HQ-9 which got saturated by bunch of banshee decoys and loitering munitions. People calling it sh*t aren't calling it sh*t without a reason.

Not every weapon will be shit

Its like comparing INSAS and Akash

 

[Tsunami]

View: https://youtu.be/bZOS-A-qIrc?si=d5Y_cblnAPUQ_Lap

Came across this...

 

[Ajatshatru]

Keep coping mate.

Ya , Chinese maal is shit

Josh is High sir

There’s no denying that Chinese maal is inferior in quality—that’s a widely recognized fact around the world. However, that doesn’t mean India should take its security lightly or avoid preparing for a two-front war. Regardless of the quality of Chinese maal, India must stay fully prepared and vigilant.

 

[MasterChief]

What was the GDP ratio between Al-Qaida and US when Laden took down the twin towers?

Why do you depress yourself over stupid things?

Pakis using terrorism against us should be a cause of pride, not cause of frustration. They are reduced to using terrorism against us because they are too coward to hit us conventionally. Their armed forces don't have any balls to attack india, so they brainwash kids in madarssa and send them across to blow themselves up.

What a moron .. Pakis using Terror against India, without serious repercussions is a cause of pride.. ? Countries use any tool they have to hurt enemy.. and Pakistan is using terror.. That India let it use it until Operation Sindoor is a disgrace..

 

[redpanda]

In a prolonged war like Kargil or 1971 it doesn't matter

In a skirmish like Balakote and Sindoor it becomes a point of optics

How the Pakis tricked the narrative in Balakote

Now they have a Rafale as a "War Trophy to chest thump "

They look for winning optics like S400 , Vikrant

India knowingly allowed them a Rafale kill a gun walking into a well

That's typical Paki behaviour. How are you gonna change that? Even if India had blown up Karachi they would have found ways to cope with their cooked of claims of blowing x, y & z airbase of India, S-400, etc. Why do you care so much about what paki thinks? They lost half of their country in 71 and still claimed victory for years.