- Joined
- Jun 27, 2024
- Messages
- 4,086
- Likes
- 24,048
Very interesting! But it is hard to believe that Pakistani jet destruction is unverified as of now. There have been strong hints of such successful attacks at the 11-12 air bases that were struck, as well as a few in the air. What happened to the 2 awacs aircraft( at least one) that were said to be lost. Are only hangars and runways( apart from radars) confirmed to be damaged. And no aircraft?and Final comparative analysis
=====
To compare the evaluations of Pakistan’s claim of shooting down Indian fighter jets and India’s claims of hitting terrorist sites and airbases in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) and Pakistan proper during Operation Sindoor (May 2025), I will create a single bar chart with updated colors as requested: green for Pakistan’s claim and orange/saffron for India’s claims. The chart will display the scores for each framework (pramana, viveka, Nyaya, satya) and the final aggregate score as percentages, based on the latest analyses. Pakistan’s claim, evaluated with the confirmed Mirage 2000 drop tank evidence, scored 8/40 (20%) for pramana, 7/30 (23%) for viveka, 5/30 (17%) for Nyaya, 8/30 (27%) for satya, and 28/130 (22%) overall. India’s claims, incorporating the DGMO briefing and satellite imagery, scored 33/40 (83%) for pramana, 22/30 (73%) for viveka, 22/30 (73%) for Nyaya, 23/30 (77%) for satya, and 100/130 (77%) overall. The chart will use a bar type, with green and orange/saffron colors suitable for both dark and light themes, and include the final score for comparative credibility.
View attachment 38209
Interpretation
The chart visually highlights the low credibility of Pakistan’s claim (22% overall, likely false) compared to the high credibility of India’s claims (77% overall, likely true). Pakistan’s scores are low across all frameworks, reflecting the lack of direct evidence (Mirage 2000 drop tank misidentification), logical inconsistencies, and biased sources. India’s scores are significantly higher, driven by robust satellite imagery, authoritative briefings, and neutral corroboration for terror camp and airbase strikes, though jet destruction claims are less substantiated. The final score comparison (22% vs. 77%) emphasizes the significant evidential gap between the claims.
IAF has pounded 11 places only baaki in places main Pakistani Genrallo ki Gaand Fati hogi..8 New locations as revealed by Pak dossier
- Peshawar
- Attock
- Gujrat
- Gujranwala
- Jhang
- Bhawalnagar
- Chor
- Hyderabad
Shiv Aroor stated that he was personally briefed by the IAF, confirming that India had taken out 9 Pakistani aircraft, both in the air and on the ground.
View: https://x.com/shirobarks/status/1929568339526812143?s=46&t=s5Zjz3wgeVF4a5zNfD4EYA
Because you need to train hard in peace time to win battles when war is declared . these are war machines they need to be tested multiple times from every single ship in IN which has inductedCan anybody tell me why do we testfire so many brahmos?
The missile costs 4-5 million dollars ffs
What's the need to test fire brahmos when we have already test fired a lot of them.
He also given clean chit to china saying no chinese help . But were as some reports are boasting how chinese satellites help guide PL-15E to take down our gets .. Stand clear le lo saar ..If you don't want to take uncle Xi and wants to mend terms and bring more dollars for their companies then just do it .. Don't give stupid rhetoric like Akai chin is our and POK ke liye jaan de denge ..I'm not an optimistic person. You guys know it. I'll just put it forth before people start labeling this as cope.
I have a feeling he's saying this to make Pakistan a little more comfortable with the idea of attacking India.
Military personnel usually don't make such comments randomly. Coming from a CDS, it will definitely embolden Pakistan, at least on a moral level.
I would honestly love if we keep making comments which emboldens Pakistan further.
Takes the culpability of starting the war off of us and puts it on them.
Not at all convinced of this as of yet but I would suggest we run his comments through the rumination machine. I don't believe he is stupid but we'll have to wait and watch.
It seems US is targeting India , 500% Tariffs if we procure Russian OIL , Seems EU also supporting this.
Turkey ,AzarB , China are against us and even our neighbors are not in good relation with us. Its testing time for us and if some internal conflict happens , then it would be more difficult. All this Indicates that we are arriving. If US really targets India with tariffs , India should retaliate. We should be thinking for parallel currency against USD . The non Invite of G7 also indicates that they only want money from India and do not want to see India progressing. I am of the view that aligning with china in selected sectors to create parallel systems on world stage to counter ICJ/UNSE/UN and others will help creating divide and will also help playing in both systems for achieving our Interests . tough times ahead!
Nope the only way you can completely stop the terror attack in region is by destroying Pakistan with or without nuclear war
Yes you will be also hit and northern India might go to flames but at least Pakistan will no longer in the map
This guy can't even do damage control ..We are lead by idiots it seems
View: https://x.com/ANI/status/1929835058170417296
We will tell you how many aircraft we destroyed and how many radars did we destroy. We'll make a rough assessment of that and come out with that shortly.
every missile has a shelf life of about 10-15 years thus if not fired it wouldnt be safe to use thus regular test fires are conducted it also affirms that we are having a large inventry in stockCan anybody tell me why do we testfire so many brahmos?
The missile costs 4-5 million dollars ffs
What's the need to test fire brahmos when we have already test fired a lot of them.
Exactly. His tone is not aggressive enough. He is a military general. He has no business lecturing about peace and economy. Leave that to politicians.
Exactly. His tone is not aggressive enough. He is a military general. He has no business lecturing about peace and economy. Leave that to politicians.And yet, it is the CDS who needs to be scapegoated just cuz his 'tone' is not 'aggressive enough'....
Yes it has nd that bothers me the most. He could say No. Its not like refusing is a coup or anything.Has it ever occurred to you that he is talking that way cuz the incumbent wants him to?