Just acquiring new longer range BVR is not enough, datalinks, and modifications to existing AEW&Cs & getting new ones is critical.
next time.Rubbish.
).
You are a paki or chong. Im leaning toward the latter actually. Look at all this CoNCeRn posting kek.
This is absolutely bullshit written over there, absolute nonsense fanatical pseudo science stuff. First of all, an active radar homing missile like PL15, Aim120 will always give warning in the RWR of the aircraft in the terminal phase regardless of who is firing and who is guiding it. If an AWACS is tracking a target, that target will also get RWR so it will get warned much beforehand. Fighters like Rafale are equiped with MAWS UV/IR that will detect missile launches at long ranges regarless if it is getting tracked by IR missile or Radar guided. Also, AWACS or third party platform cannot directly guide AAMs launched from distant fighters, it is always like Data is first transmitted to firing platform and that platform needs to provide that data to the missile, once the launch platform goes cold and no longer provided data link (whether its own radar data or AWACS datalink) the missile is on its own and have to rely on its own active seeker to find a target. AWACS cannot guide AAMs on their own (may be in future they would be able but not right now)"Pakistani J-10C fighters launched PL-15 beyond-visual-range (BVR) missiles using targeting data from ground-based radars. The missiles were guided mid-flight by a Saab 2000 Erieye AEW&C platform, while the J-10C itself remained electronically silent, without activating its own radar. The third-party targeting denied Indian pilots radar warnings, leaving them without any advance cue to deploy countermeasures."
"In contrast, Indian aircraft suffered from poor network integration, with Rafale, Su-30, and Mirage-2000 unable to share data effectively."
"India’s formidable integrated, layered air defense system, including Russian-imported S-400 surface-to-air missiles, successfully withstood the intense attacks, effectively intercepting or diverting most of Pakistan’s munitions, including ballistic missiles aimed at New Delhi."
"The conflict highlighted the importance of information integration between different weapon systems. When procuring new armaments, Taiwan must ensure their effective integration with existing assets to achieve seamless information sharing and collaborative operations across platforms. This includes data links and command and control between fighter jets, UAV operators, missile batteries, and similar assets."
I could resort to insults and prove you wrong, but i am not a pimply teenager with issues, so i will refrain.
.>5:56 You post your retarded crying in this threadI could resort to insults and prove you wrong, but i am not a pimply teenager with issues, so i will refrain.
Not one of the posts you so kindly took the time out to dig proves anything
Meanwhile, drill this into your head;
- As an Indian, expressing grave concerns about the future doesn't make you a Paki/Chong.
- Asking questions about our political establishment's lack of vision and strategic outlook with regards to our national defence and offense capabilities doesn't make you a Paki/Chong.
- Acknowledging a handful of aircraft might have been lost in the larger scheme of things doesn't make you a Paki/Chong. Our CDS said exactly the same, in different words.
- Expressing a desire to maintain our historical/legacy superiority over the Paki c***s through whatever means possible doesn't make you a Paki/Chong.
- Stating that our foreign allies have not backed us and our one sided tilt towards the west at the expense of our steadfast friends the Russians is a debatable foreign policy approach doesn't make you a Paki/Chong.
- Stating that we should have retaliated massively when the Pakis broke ceasefire doesn't make you a Paki/Chong.
- A desire to see our high levels of deterrence maintained in the future doesn't make you a Paki/Chong.
Lastly, these boards are for healthy debate and sharing of viewpoints from across the spectrum.
Bravado, aggrandisation ,demagoguery, sycophancy and a blind sense of confidence is how empires have fallen.
Never underestimate the enemy, look to the future and ensure we are always two steps ahead, by hook or by crook is my view on things.
Of course you are entitled to your opinion and i am happy to debate teenagers in my spare time. But bring out a counter argument i stead of mudslinging.
2 years? China has 3 prototypes of J35 so far. Will they actually manufacture 40 of those in 2 years?
Actually, I was wondering about the statements of CDS about Porkies being rational and what the tactical mistake was?!! So far no Indian youtuber was able to provide good enough answer but this Porkie youtuber was able to provide me satisfactory answers!
I partially agree with you. It is true that India bitchslapping Chinese military equipments brought some relief to USA; and now, USA will be bolder in defending Taiwan if it came to that.
