Operation Sindoor and Aftermath (106 Viewers)

prior to balakot strikes, how many other nuclear armed countries sent their fighter jets to bomb another nuclear armed country?

and how many times it has happened since balakot strikes, and who did it?

Aside from the above point.

By focusing on "only trees and crows died paijaan", assume for argument sake, it is true, still the following facts remain

>After Kargil War this is the first actual response to a terror attack via Airstrikes.

>Vajpayee and Maunmohan both chickened out from doing the needful, not Modi.

>IAF jets went inside Pakistan's KPK, dropped their loads and returned safely. :pmegusta:

>PAF was sleeping tight while the terrorists in Balakot and other locations stayed wide awake :cmegusta:


Popular tactic of congis/greens/pakis, deflect and magnify things they want to, so that the actual Ls that they have received is minimized.

It was "crows and trees" after Balakot, the above didn't matter
It is "over 90000 rafales shot down" after Op Sindoor, All PAF airbases and jihadi palaces being wrecked doesn't matter.
 


They have learnt nothing from 2019. This meek fake ass patriotic/jingoistic larp does not work against the OGs in this business - only makes them traitors in the eyes of the median voter. But they just cannot ignore the urge - the entirety of their strategy is based on defaming Ji anyway, that is all they have been doing since 2014 and hence, almost knowingly walking into the beautifully laid out trap - AGAIN!
 
no matter how much info is given during and after a military conflict, in this age of 5th gen warfare, nobody is going to be given a clear victory in narrative space.

even the U.S is not exempt from this now. notice how many press conferences they did and clarifications they gave for one bombing raid on iran.

questions will be raised no matter what, we better get used to it.

other than china and noko, i don't think any other country will be able to manage 5th gen warfare internally.
I ain't denying that but at least they should've given a few interviews to clear the basics. There's almost non-existent engagement.
Oppositions would do what they're supposed to do but still the things could've been managed better.
We should learn from Israel. They update every event through every platform. Even a basic interception is posted & discussed.
They will do their own things, that doesn't mean we should do none.
 
They have learnt nothing from 2019. This meek fake ass patriotic/jingoistic larp does not work against the OGs in this business - only makes them traitors in the eyes of the median voter. But they just cannot ignore the urge - the entirety of their strategy is based on defaming Ji anyway, that is all they have been doing since 2014 and hence, almost knowingly walking into the beautifully laid out trap - AGAIN!

This time also there is nothing plausible about any drama they do, it is exclusively to malign the Leader by grasping at straws, it is naked shamelessness to gain power at any cost, even defaming the nation and armed forces.
 
So, anyone from Dhando lovers club want to discuss what Indonesian defence attaché is saying, or is he lying?

He spat pure facts nothing else.

There are also some theories floating around like Rafale were low flying. So they carried only MICA rather Meteor. Because at that height MICA and Meteor have pretty much same performance. And Rafale were mostly geared for A2G role, so MICA made more sense.

Meteor is not integrated with Rafale. The only saver for Rafale was Spectra which failed as well !

Cheen is not going to help porkland other than with equipment. I don’t agree with our purpose then. This is how I see it.

Pak Ministers have accepted on TV that China helped Pakistan with sateliite intelligence and real-time targetting information of our air defence sites and jets.

Can be lying but totally possible.
 
It’s so strange that most Muslim nation fall for Pakistan propaganda that they have upper hand during the last skirmish. Reason being their media made this image .

But it’s really disgusting that Indian people who seen that no Pakistani missile was successful attacking Indian cities or village. Except for border with blind mortars.

Only and only problem we could have with government is that they stopped when we had upper hand at this golden opportunity.

Pakistan acted just like Iran. Yes we might have lost a few birds but so did porky. We should have be ruthless dealing with Pakistan.

Thanks to democracy which is instilled in us. To a level that we accept these statement on our Indian forum try this on any porky forum you will be banned. That should tell you about their propaganda level.
 
There are three possible responses Modi & Co. can pursue in the event of a terrorist attack:

1. They can bomb some irrelevant or symbolic structures and claim victory-> the kind of hollow theatrics that only fool the gullible jaahils, not a politically aware Indian public.

2. They can target terrorist training camps-> a tactic that might offer short-term optics, but is strategically futile. These camps are easily reconstituted, fueled by an endless supply of jihadis, and it merely becomes a waiting game until the next attack.

3. They can strike at core Pakistani military assets->the actual puppeteers behind cross-border terrorism. This approach directly raises the cost for Rawalpindi, forcing the Pakistani military to think twice before enabling further attacks. Only this third option creates real deterrence.

Modi & Co. made a fundamental miscalculation- they THOUGHT they could achieve the fruits of Response-3 with Response-2 which is obviously false.
 
Thanks to democracy which is instilled in us. To a level that we accept these statement on our Indian forum try this on any porky forum you will be banned. That should tell you about their propaganda level.

don't know how much democracy has to do with this, from my end i am in favour of multiple perspectices because of this "Ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti".
 

View: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1076160/Command_Modern_Operations/

I am going to play around and simulate these scenarios:
- CM400 attack on IN CBG (MRSAM)
- CM400 + subsonic ASHM on IN CBG (MRSAM)
- IN Brahmos attack on PN and Karachi
- CM400 and TBM attack on S400 Adampur & Bhuj (with and without MRSAM)
- Countering J35 with IADS
- Full scale missile attack on PAF w/ air & surface launched Brahmos.
 

View: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1076160/Command_Modern_Operations/

I am going to play around and simulate these scenarios:
- CM400 attack on IN CBG (MRSAM)
- CM400 + subsonic ASHM on IN CBG (MRSAM)
- IN Brahmos attack on PN and Karachi
- CM400 and TBM attack on S400 Adampur & Bhuj (with and without MRSAM)
- Countering J35 with IADS
- Full scale missile attack on PAF w/ air & surface launched Brahmos.


There is a YouTube channel (Grim Reaper), which simulates such battles in DCS.

TLDR is you can overwhelm any static AD (S400/Patriot) or CBGs with enough missiles and assymetric tricks.

If I were Pakistan I would have been war-gaming sinking Vikrant since its keel-laying started.
 
Sat images don't lie.

I believe it was a simple calibration problem , I don't remember the article now but it had a ver reasonable explanation for where the bombs landed and why they did.
Then answer us, why did Pakis take 53 days to show the site to foreign journalists? If nothing was hit, why didn't they show it the next day? What would have been a bigger proof and humiliation for us other than that? Huh? Answer us.
 
Issue with Point 9 and 10

It's difficult for bvr missile to hit planes when the plane is flying away from it.

A proper bvr engagement must have taken place while the bombing took place.
Because I don't think they hit the planes who did the attacks , they must have hit the planes flying CAP in support inside our own airspace .
 
Then answer us, why did Pakis take 53 days to show the site to foreign journalists? If nothing was hit, why didn't they show it the next day? What would have been a bigger proof and humiliation for us other than that? Huh? Answer us.
Because it was a terror site and whether hit it or not would be embaressing to show a bunch of terrorists in there ... who knows the thinking of the Pakis.

Anyway IMO from what I read, Balakot was a miss . Others can disagree.
 
He spat pure facts nothing else.



Meteor is not integrated with Rafale. The only saver for Rafale was Spectra which failed as well !



Pak Ministers have accepted on TV that China helped Pakistan with sateliite intelligence and real-time targetting information of our air defence sites and jets.

Can be lying but totally possible.
Your pfp tho😂
 
Because it was a terror site and whether hit it or not would be embaressing to show a bunch of terrorists in there ... who knows the thinking of the Pakis.

Anyway IMO from what I read, Balakot was a miss . Others can disagree.
Do you even read what you write? 🤣 It took Pakis 53 days to get all terrorists away from there and remove terrorist material from site even when the the Paki army will control what the media will see? 53 days?? 😂😂 And what will be the bigger evidence other than Paki army took 53 days to let anyone visit the site? Some said it was miss, other said there were holes at top of the building. If it was a miss, how much time would it take Paki army to get the media there? And wouldn't that be the biggest humiliation for us that all 4 of our bombs missed?

I mean how can even an Indian think that, even after Operation Sindoor, where IAF showed exemplary competence and precision, that all 4 bombs at Balakot missed is beyond me. And that is when the IAF has many times said that it hit the site. I really sometimes doubt people like you whether you are even Indian. You people are ready to pounce on any shred of flimsy evidence and narrative to put a blot on our own forces and doubt their credibility. You people believe the enemy rather than our own forces.
 
Last edited:
Aside from the above point.

By focusing on "only trees and crows died paijaan", assume for argument sake, it is true, still the following facts remain

>After Kargil War this is the first actual response to a terror attack via Airstrikes.

>Vajpayee and Maunmohan both chickened out from doing the needful, not Modi.

>IAF jets went inside Pakistan's KPK, dropped their loads and returned safely. :pmegusta:

>PAF was sleeping tight while the terrorists in Balakot and other locations stayed wide awake :cmegusta:


Popular tactic of congis/greens/pakis, deflect and magnify things they want to, so that the actual Ls that they have received is minimized.

It was "crows and trees" after Balakot, the above didn't matter
It is "over 90000 rafales shot down" after Op Sindoor, All PAF airbases and jihadi palaces being wrecked doesn't matter.

I think it would be unfair to compare PM Vajpayee's actions with Manmohan's actions. Manmohan was taking orders from US deep-state actors such as McCain. PM Vajpayee defied entire US establishment. Are you familiar with General Vij's tank strike corpse secretly heading towards Pakistan? I think it was a brinkmanship devised by Vajpayee Administration. In this brinkmanship, General Vij played the role of a bad cop and civilian leadership in New Delhi played the role of a good cop.

If my memory is correct, this event happened after 911 attack on USA. This means Pakistan had become indispensable for USA in the latter's war against Afghanistan. As we know, Pakistan becomes emboldened and carries out terrorist attacks against India when it feels like it is in USA's good graces. So, Pakistan carried out a terrorist attack against Indian parliament. After India placed the blame on Pakistan, the civilian (puppet) government of Pakistan implied that this was the work of rogue actors within the Pakistan's military. Therefore, India should not be "harsh" and be more understanding -- according to Pakistan.

When USA/Pakistan discovered that a column of Indian tanks was secretly moving towards the border, Indian government feigned ignorance. Only after this, Pakistan became more reasonable. Vajpayee told Bush that just because Pakistan was helping USA does not entitle Pakistan to carry out terrorist attacks against India with impunity. So an agreement was fostered where Pakistan would co-operate with India on anti-terror investigation.

Nevertheless, I would agree that a full blown war with Pakistan should have happened. Even Vajpayee, in his later years, regretted not attacking Pakistan.
 
There are three possible responses Modi & Co. can pursue in the event of a terrorist attack:

1. They can bomb some irrelevant or symbolic structures and claim victory-> the kind of hollow theatrics that only fool the gullible jaahils, not a politically aware Indian public.

2. They can target terrorist training camps-> a tactic that might offer short-term optics, but is strategically futile. These camps are easily reconstituted, fueled by an endless supply of jihadis, and it merely becomes a waiting game until the next attack.

3. They can strike at core Pakistani military assets->the actual puppeteers behind cross-border terrorism. This approach directly raises the cost for Rawalpindi, forcing the Pakistani military to think twice before enabling further attacks. Only this third option creates real deterrence.

Modi & Co. made a fundamental miscalculation- they THOUGHT they could achieve the fruits of Response-3 with Response-2 which is obviously false.
Misreading the situation. Their vital assets were damaged badly or destroyed and they begged for the ceasefire
 
It was a failure... they missed the targets. There has been a lot of information on it from non Pakistani sources over the years.

OP Sindoor was however not . The IAF learnt as air forces do from the past.
Photography evidence of that era show a gapping hole in the building where missile entered, hence Balakote attack was successful.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top