Operation Sindoor

Ya'll Nibbiars The pakis are basically saying that they have received Hugh losses yesterday after the Indian retaliations.

1000023768.webp
 

Scenario: BrahMos Strikes & Naval Offensive on Karachi​

Late 9 May 2025, Pakistan’s drone-and-missile raid on three Indian airbases triggers India’s maritime arm to open a new front: surface ships and submarines launch BrahMos cruise-missile salvos against Karachi port, its naval headquarters, and nearby fuel depots. Explosions and fires are reported across the harbour, echoing 1971’s Operations Trident and Python —the last time India struck Karachi directly. (www.ndtv.com, Business Today)
Indian task-groups—Rajput-, Kolkata- and Visakhapatnam-class destroyers plus INS Vikrant’s carrier strike wing—had already shifted to 300-400 NM off Karachi, each ship fielding 8–16 BrahMos cells. The extended-range BrahMos (290–800 km, Mach 3) lets them hit the port without breaching Pakistani airspace for more than a few seconds. (Indian Defence Research Wing)

Game-Theory View: Where Are We on the Escalation Ladder?​

StepActionEscalatory ValueDeterrent ValueNuclear Risk
1Counter-Terror Airstrikes (Sindoor)LowModerateMinimal
2Pak drone/missile hit on IAF basesMediumLowMinimal
3India’s BrahMos & Naval Raid on KarachiHigh—first strike on Pakistan’s economic hub since 1971Very High (signals dominance in the maritime domain)Still sub-nuclear (conventional strike, no cities deliberately targeted)
4Pak response: Possible anti-ship/ballistic attack on Western Fleet or economic blockade threatsVery HighLowRed-line proximity— accidental ship loss could push toward tactical-nuke rhetoric
In iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma terms, Pakistan’s second-round defection (attacking Indian bases) is met by India’s proportional-plus response: punishment sufficient to raise the opponent’s cost curve but calculated to stay under Islamabad’s stated nuclear thresholds (which emphasise “existential threats” or capture of territory).

Why BrahMos on Karachi?​

  1. Credible Punishment Without Territory Grab – Precision sea-launched missiles devastate fuel farms, piers, and PNS Iqbal’s midget-sub pens yet avoid mass-civilian casualties, letting India claim compliance with self-defence norms. (Business Today)
  2. Escalation Dominance – By shifting to the Arabian Sea, India exploits asymmetric naval strength—over 140 warships versus Pakistan’s < 20 major combatants—while presenting minimal targets for Pakistani Army rocket forces. (Indian Defence Research Wing)
  3. Economic Leverage – Karachi handles ~60 % of Pakistan’s trade; disabling it multiplies diplomatic pressure without crossing the nuclear threshold reserved for territorial incursions.

Likely Immediate Follow-Ons​

Indian MovePurposeEscalation Increment
Maritime Quarantine—declare a “maritime exclusion zone” 200 NM around Karachi & Gwadar, backed by surface combatants and Scorpène submarinesDeny Pakistan seaborne trade and naval mobility; force talks under duress+½ step (blockade = economic war, still conventional)
Second-wave BrahMos on radar & ammo depots at Ormara and Jinnah Naval BaseSuppress retaliatory air/sea options+¼ step
Public Satellite Proof + PIB briefings showcasing pinpoint hits and minimal collateralInformation war to sustain international tolerance0
These moves keep India one rung below the nuclear-use threshold while leaving Pakistan few pain-free countermoves: any strike on Indian warships risks loss of its own fleet and pushes the ladder upward.

Strategic Pay-Offs & Risks​

Pay-Offs
  • Restores deterrence by demonstrating India can impose direct costs on Pakistan’s economy and Navy.
  • Establishes escalation dominance in a new domain (sea) after land-air exchanges.
  • Preserves moral high ground—precision strikes on military value targets, framed as counter-terror retaliation.
Risks
  • Karachi’s centrality means even conventional damage could induce panic and compel Islamabad to brand the strike “existential”, inviting nuclear-threshold rhetoric.
  • Blockade scenarios can hurt global shipping and raise pressure from third parties (U.S., China, Gulf states) to force de-escalation within 72 hours.
  • Accidental vessel loss (e.g., a stray Harbah anti-ship missile) could provoke rapid ladder-jump to ballistic or tactical-nuclear signalling.

Bottom Line​

BrahMos salvos on Karachi coupled with a limited naval quarantine give India a high-payoff, controlled-risk way to punish Pakistan’s escalation while still staying just below Islamabad’s declared nuclear tripwires. Game-theoretic logic suggests India will hold at this rung, consolidate its naval advantage, and wait to see if Pakistan escalates further; any fresh Pakistani strike on Indian naval units would almost certainly trigger deeper conventional blows—yet still short of the nuclear precipice.

Key Sources​


  • IDRW, “Indian Naval Assets Armed with BrahMos Move Closer to Karachi” (8 May 2025) – deployment & missile specs. (Indian Defence Research Wing)
  • NDTV, “Overnight Naval Ops In Arabian Sea After Pak Tries To Attack India” (9 May 2025) – confirmation of naval operations post-Pak strike. (www.ndtv.com)
  • Business Today, “Indian Navy Opens Front Against Pakistan … Hits Karachi Port” (9 May 2025) – initial battle-damage reports from Karachi. (Business Today)
 
1000023769.webp
 
Ajayant Tripathi said:
Exactly. We should keep it continuing. Today's drone wave should take out more of their Aerial Defense weapons. I also want our drone to target Quetta today. Tell them we can reach every corner of pakistan. I also want some more strikes around GHQ Rawlpindi.

We should not stop it. They have given us a wonderul oppurtunity to slowly cook them. Each day we defang them some more. By the time they realize what has actually happened it will be too late.

This is exactly the kind of warfare i want. It doesn't gain intensity but neutralizes the enemy.
Click to expand...

Quetta at min is 600KM from Rajasthan (Sri Ganganagar). At IAF arsenal the longest endurance drone seems to be Harop which is about 200Km. The only Loitering Munition which can target at that range is the Sheshnag-150 which has an range of over 1000Km. Don't expect NRT to have production line ready for this munition at present. They may have some trial drones, but nowhere LSP versions.

Only the situation escalates, we can see some drastic orders from NRT for these kind of products.

haldilal said:
View attachment 34387
Click to expand...

It is very bogus to call that China don't have IACCS equivalent, they have significantly higher Surveillance asset than Indian Armed forces. Be it Satellites, ISR Drones. People should stop believing these kind of statements. PLA at core will have some of the densest network centric ADS Coverage we will encounter in future. They deployed Theatre command a decade back, while we are still fiddling around it.

On the other hand Pakistan don't have these kind of stuffs. They need PAF to do the job.


NerVik said:
Did our drdo bros deliver any DEW units to the front line? I think this is another fake nooz.
Click to expand...

There is one type of DRDO Laser Unit system will be in use at Border regions. It was introduced during PM speech at Republic Day/I day (Can't remember). That system is in use. Don't expect the latest 30 KW one, which is under development trials.
 
Guys what I'm picking from their messaging to local nd international media is they want to respond in the same way like india did to grab international media headlines..

They will definitely employ both Air launched cruise missiles nd MLRS .. even use of conventional ballistic missile can't be ruled out..

Looks like our BMD will be seeing some action..

They hv no other options their army has already suffered max damage to their already dented image thus they will resort to something maniaclly.

They will target our military installations across country.. even our dams infrastructure...

CAUTION WE WILL HV SOME MEN & MATERIAL LOSES.

BUT OUR RESPONSE WILL BE CATACLYSMIC.

we will rain down brahmos nd pralays at paxtani military installations across country..

Even ground invasion in POK can't be ruled out.

We are here for long haul..💥💥

Even series of meetings happening now in Delhi govt corridor is a give away..
 

Parallel vs Serial Targeting: Strategic Logic & Escalation Effects​

ActorCurrent Target-Selection PatternOperational RationaleEscalation Consequence
IndiaParallel strikes—nine terror camps across PoK + Punjab on 7 May; BrahMos salvos on Karachi port-complex 9 May; simultaneous interdiction sorties along LoC the same night. (Press Information Bureau, Daijiworld)1. Overload air-defence & C2—forcing Pakistan to defend many axes at once.2. Warden-style “system paralysis”: hit dispersed nodes—terror logistics, naval fuel farms, radar hubs—so the adversary cannot re-aggregate combat power quickly.3. Escalation dominance: show ability to raise costs in multiple domains (air/land/sea) while still claiming proportionality (only military value targets).Raises the ladder two rungs at once—Karachi strike adds a maritime/economic dimension, multiplying pressure yet staying below nuclear red-line because no population centres are intentionally targeted.
PakistanSerial focus—Pahalgam terror attack (single district); drone-missile raid on three contiguous IAF bases (Jammu sector); sporadic LoC shelling. (The Australian, Reuters)1. Resource constraint—fewer modern strike platforms and limited ISR; concentrating forces maximises local effect.2. Escalation hedging—by limiting geographic spread, Islamabad signals intent to keep conflict “manageable” and under the nuclear threshold it itself declares (“existential threat” tied to nationwide damage).Keeps conflict at one-rung-at-a-time pace, hoping international pressure caps India’s retaliation; but predictability lets India pre-position defences and plan counterblows.

Game-Theory Take​

Model the crisis as an iterated “multiboard” prisoner’s dilemma—each domain (land, air, sea) is a board.
  • India’s parallel moves are equivalent to defecting on multiple boards simultaneously, multiplying Pakistan’s immediate pay-off loss.
  • Pakistan’s serial response leaves other boards temporarily cooperative (undefended), forcing it either to (a) scatter scarce assets—lowering strike quality—or (b) escalate to strategic weapons sooner than desired.
Hence India gains escalation leverage: every Pakistani escalation on one board (e.g., drones at Jammu) can be met with a wider Indian retaliation on two boards (BrahMos + additional airstrikes), ratcheting Pakistani cost curves faster than India’s.

Impact on the Escalation Ladder​

  1. Resource Dilution: Pakistan must now defend Karachi, Lahore, Bahawalpur, Muridke, and Gwadar simultaneously. Naval redeployment to protect Karachi drags units away from the Makran coast—creating windows for follow-on BrahMos strikes on Ormara or Jinnah Naval Base. (Indian Defence Research Wing)
  2. Command-and-Control Saturation: Parallel incoming vectors (sea-skimming + high-altitude) complicate shoot-list sequencing; mis-sorted intercepts raise accidental loss probability—nudging the ladder toward “use-or-lose” nuclear rhetoric sooner.
  3. International Clock Compression: Wide-area damage to Pakistan’s economic hub prompts faster third-party mediation. India banks on a short campaign window (< 72 h) to achieve punitive aims before diplomatic freeze-fire.
  4. Deterrence Signalling: By advertising precision BDA imagery via PIB and Defence Minister’s social posts, India underscores it could have hit Pakistani population centres but didn’t—branding its parallel blitz as restrained. (Al Jazeera)

Likely Next Moves​

If Pakistan widens to two cities (e.g., strikes Mumbai coast + another IAF base)India’s probable response (per parallel-dominance doctrine)
Limited follow-up drone raid on Mumbai naval dockyardSecond BrahMos wave on fuel depots at Gwadar and Sialkot ammo hub—two new cities, keeping the numerical lead ≥ 2:1.
Concentrated ballistic strike on Kalaikunda AFS onlyShallow Integrated Battle-Group thrust across Shakargarh bulge plus cyber-blackout of Karachi port logistics—again multisector.
Threat of tactical-nuke demonstration in desertIndia mobilises S-400/IAD layers nationwide and publicly readies Agni-V conventional payload—raising costs across all population centres without first use.
Parallel strategy aims to cap conflict quickly by price-shocking Pakistan’s decision-makers; serial approach aims to drag conflict out hoping for diplomatic rescue. Game theory predicts the side with credible parallel capacity (India) will keep initiative unless Pakistan expends scarce resources to copy the same pattern—an expensive gamble that risks moving the confrontation to the nuclear threshold sooner rather than later.

Key References​


  • PIB press note on nine-site Operation Sindoor strikes (7 May 2025) (Press Information Bureau)
  • NDTV/Reuters composite dispatch on Pakistan’s drone-missile raid at Jammu-Udhampur-Pathankot (8 May 2025) (The Australian, Reuters)
  • Daijiworld first-hand report on BrahMos strike damage at Karachi port (9 May 2025) (Daijiworld)
  • IDRW tracking of Indian naval BrahMos deployments toward Karachi (8 May 2025) (Indian Defence Research Wing)
  • Al Jazeera/MEA briefings on India’s “targeted, precise, controlled” action messaging (8 May 2025) (Al Jazeera)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suryavanshi
  • Sticky
Operation Sindoor Official Statement and News Sources. (No Chit Chat)
2
Replies
20
Views
4K
Decahex
D
SKC
Rescue Operation in Wayanad
Replies
15
Views
519
VictorDelta4
VictorDelta4
hit&run
Indian Navy's Daring Rescue Operation. Critical Chinese Mariner Rescued | India Today
Replies
2
Views
459
samsaptaka
samsaptaka
haldilal
Operation Shakti
Replies
0
Views
165
haldilal
haldilal
haldilal
Operation Brasstacks
Replies
0
Views
169
haldilal
haldilal

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Back
Top