- Joined
- Jun 27, 2024
- Messages
- 3,834
- Likes
- 21,888
Ya'll Nibbiars The pakis are basically saying that they have received Hugh losses yesterday after the Indian retaliations.
View attachment 34391
Exactly. We should keep it continuing. Today's drone wave should take out more of their Aerial Defense weapons. I also want our drone to target Quetta today. Tell them we can reach every corner of pakistan. I also want some more strikes around GHQ Rawlpindi.
We should not stop it. They have given us a wonderul oppurtunity to slowly cook them. Each day we defang them some more. By the time they realize what has actually happened it will be too late.
This is exactly the kind of warfare i want. It doesn't gain intensity but neutralizes the enemy.
Did our drdo bros deliver any DEW units to the front line? I think this is another fake nooz.
Actor | Current Target-Selection Pattern | Operational Rationale | Escalation Consequence |
---|---|---|---|
India | Parallel strikes—nine terror camps across PoK + Punjab on 7 May; BrahMos salvos on Karachi port-complex 9 May; simultaneous interdiction sorties along LoC the same night. (Press Information Bureau, Daijiworld) | 1. Overload air-defence & C2—forcing Pakistan to defend many axes at once.2. Warden-style “system paralysis”: hit dispersed nodes—terror logistics, naval fuel farms, radar hubs—so the adversary cannot re-aggregate combat power quickly.3. Escalation dominance: show ability to raise costs in multiple domains (air/land/sea) while still claiming proportionality (only military value targets). | Raises the ladder two rungs at once—Karachi strike adds a maritime/economic dimension, multiplying pressure yet staying below nuclear red-line because no population centres are intentionally targeted. |
Pakistan | Serial focus—Pahalgam terror attack (single district); drone-missile raid on three contiguous IAF bases (Jammu sector); sporadic LoC shelling. (The Australian, Reuters) | 1. Resource constraint—fewer modern strike platforms and limited ISR; concentrating forces maximises local effect.2. Escalation hedging—by limiting geographic spread, Islamabad signals intent to keep conflict “manageable” and under the nuclear threshold it itself declares (“existential threat” tied to nationwide damage). | Keeps conflict at one-rung-at-a-time pace, hoping international pressure caps India’s retaliation; but predictability lets India pre-position defences and plan counterblows. |
If Pakistan widens to two cities (e.g., strikes Mumbai coast + another IAF base) | India’s probable response (per parallel-dominance doctrine) |
---|---|
Limited follow-up drone raid on Mumbai naval dockyard | Second BrahMos wave on fuel depots at Gwadar and Sialkot ammo hub—two new cities, keeping the numerical lead ≥ 2:1. |
Concentrated ballistic strike on Kalaikunda AFS only | Shallow Integrated Battle-Group thrust across Shakargarh bulge plus cyber-blackout of Karachi port logistics—again multisector. |
Threat of tactical-nuke demonstration in desert | India mobilises S-400/IAD layers nationwide and publicly readies Agni-V conventional payload—raising costs across all population centres without first use. |
Yep. Telltale match for PL15Is this pl15? Images reported from same distt over whatsapp
Ya'll Nibbiars The pakis are basically saying that they have received Hugh losses yesterday after the Indian retaliations.
View attachment 34391