- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Messages
- 764
- Likes
- 4,299
Any how we ain’t playing test with pakis over a decade now so I don’t think Virat ever played test against Pakistan
Indian PM has made his stance clear on live TV with respect to Pakistan. Talks, if any, will happen only on terrorism & return of occupied areas of Kashmir to India.
MEA has also given a clarification that -
1) Kashmir issue is bilateral
2) There will be no talks
3) Pakistan called India
Orange groper can jump up & down all he wants but he is not going a nobel prize for solving Cashmere in one day.
Many shitricans tried but failed.
Without significant weakening of Lunderica, solving the Pakistani terrorist problem once & for all will be difficult.
Then they are even bigger morons than what I'd anticipated.
No, >"we didn't hit paki military installations saar, wonly jihadi infrastructure" is literally the official Govt stance, IAF was told to only hit "terror infra" and not uniformed terror infra, anything else is IT Celliya or paki pretending to be IT Celliya cope.
It's like couple of days back people were bashing babooze with phoren settled spawn, but if they had such clout in the first place, Op Sindoor wouldn't have happened, once Leaderji takes a decision, all these baboo{n}s have to obey.
In any case the point is now moot, since as Leaderji said, we will no longer differentiate between the Terrorists and Pakistani Military.I know, I said that to drive the point across that he was insulting the professionalism of the IAF top brass with his drivel. Perhaps I should have been a little more... direct.
You have skirted the main question.
Can AWACS be used to guide ground launched SAM missiles.
What are the technical challenges to realize that capability. Will the acquisition of this capability offer some advantage.
There are different types of radars ranging from battlefield surveillance radars to massive Over the Horizon radars.
Not all radars are mobile or have to be mobile.
I talked about the enemy destroying Radars installations not taking out SAM'S in isolation.
There are Low Power Radars, Medium Power Radars and High Power Radars etc.
Their search and track range differs.Ranges can vary from a few kilometers to hundreds of kilometers. Not even talking about OTH radars here.
The enemy usually uses Anti Radiation Missiles to take out Medium and High Power Radars.
Would Pakistan not like to take out the Barak 8 or S400 radars thus rendering the Barak 8 missiles inoperative.
Suppose assume that after the main radar is destroyed our airborne AWACS can still guide Barak 8 missiles to counter Pakistani fighters and Air to Surface missiles like the Raad or Babur.
Normally we would have to wait for an replacement radar to make the Barak 8 system work again.
What about the MRSAM systems used to guard IAF Air Bases. The Air Base is a static installation.Do they need highly mobile SAM systems. Assume that the main radar of the Barak 8 system is destroyed. What happens now.
And even mobile radars can be targeted. The anti radiation missiles will follow the direction of the signals.You have to switch off the radar to disrupt the missile seeker. Or use decoys to mislead the seeker.
My question - should we even try to enable our AWACS to guide ground launched SAM's.
In a worst case scenario where the enemy manages to knock out our main radars.
And remember SAM'S are not ICBM's .Why do you need a gigantic launch complex to store and launch SAM'S. I have already said that the launch pads will be quite small and concealed/camouflaged.
In any case the point is now moot, since as Leaderji said, we will no longer differentiate between the Terrorists and Pakistani Military.
And this another message from government.No, >"we didn't hit paki military installations saar, wonly jihadi infrastructure" is literally the official Govt stance, IAF was told to only hit "terror infra" and not uniformed terror infra, anything else is IT Celliya or paki pretending to be IT Celliya cope.
It's like couple of days back people were bashing babooze with phoren settled spawn, but if they had such clout in the first place, Op Sindoor wouldn't have happened, once Leaderji takes a decision, all these baboo{n}s have to obey.
And this another message from government.
______________
Terrorists & Pak Govt supporting terrorism are the same for us.
View: https://x.com/sidhant/status/1922235508635107729?t=qPEkGCGVB-E7XZdkzYx-pw&s=19
And this another message from government.
______________
Terrorists & Pak Govt supporting terrorism are the same for us.
View: https://x.com/sidhant/status/1922235508635107729?t=qPEkGCGVB-E7XZdkzYx-pw&s=19
Ye baad me aaya, during Modi's 8 PM address, throughout the 4 days of Op Sindoor that MEA baboo was chanting "coomitted to de-escalation", "proportionate response" and "only terrorist infra, no paki military sites hit ".
Trump will come and go.. He needs a win to show American relevance in today's multi polar world.
India must not make enemies with USA but convince Trump via trade deals and arms purchase.
Change the narrative, invest in Western media and thats not done by sending in Burkha and Allahbadia as we all have seen.
"A fool with a good tool is still a fool"