Operation Sindoor

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x
Indian PM has made his stance clear on live TV with respect to Pakistan. Talks, if any, will happen only on terrorism & return of occupied areas of Kashmir to India.

MEA has also given a clarification that -

1) Kashmir issue is bilateral
2) There will be no talks
3) Pakistan called India

Orange groper can jump up & down all he wants but he is not going a nobel prize for solving Cashmere in one day.

Many shitricans tried but failed.

Without significant weakening of Lunderica, solving the Pakistani terrorist problem once & for all will be difficult.

We must pray that She Jinpig grows the balls to invade Taiwan and boot the US out of Japan and SoKo through boom-boom or diplomatic means.

Even if Uncle Sam chicken's out, he'll be shown as a total cuck to the world, if US tries to man-fight the Chong for Taiwan, both will be beaten up badly, whoever wins will only get a pyrhhic victory.

It is that time we must solve the matter of the 3 Pakistans once and for all.
 
primary mandate and mission is "to provide, in synergy with other inter-services, the most efficient, assured and cost effective aerial defence of Pakistan."

PAF failed in its primary mission. PAF is built as an offensive force rather than defensive. Their strategy, as I understand, is to parry and riposte. They defend their airspace with the combination of jets and ADs and then launch a counter offensive against the enemy. Their jets are the centerpiece of their strategy and pose a challenge to their adversaries.

But in the recent conflict we saw that IAF used drones to saturate, supress and destroy the ground based systems and PAF jets were unable to defend their airspace against numerous small rcs drones. IAF also launched PGMs and ALCM from a stand-off range without entering Pak airspace, which again PAF could not defend. So they failed to parry the attack as they gave importance to jets over AD ie they focused on offensive capabilities and did not mobilized enough resources towards defensive capabilities. IAF knew this and exploited it well in Op Sindoor. So, PAF jets were ineffective against drones and couldn't target IAF jets as they were well within their airspace. This was the first half.

The second half was the riposte. In this part, PAF was to launch a counter offensive. Here they knew that India has a potent AD network and it would be fatal to send in their jets. So they launched drones across the border but tried to saturate AD over Jammu and Amritsar. I believe their plan was to exhaust the AD systems here and enter through this gap to strike multiple airbases in North India.They even tried to sneak in a rocket artillery but they could not breach Indian air defence shield. So, like the first half, PAF jets couldn't do anything other than defending it's airspace from incoming Indian Jets.

Overall, I'd say the crown jewels of PAF, their fighter jets were highly ineffective in this conflict as they did not adjust their strategy according to the modern threat scenario because

1.Delusion that their pilots and equipment are better than IAF

2.Their Nuclear blackmail would keep India at bay
Also, I don't know how PAF jets were downed. Whether it was a SAM or A2A, we don't know. So I won't comment on that.

After this humiliating defeat, PAF would be looking for a chance to even the score with its Indian counterpart. It would be interesting to see how they rebuild themselves and what kind of strategy they would adopt.


PKMKB.
 
Then they are even bigger morons than what I'd anticipated.

No, >"we didn't hit paki military installations saar, wonly jihadi infrastructure" is literally the official Govt stance, IAF was told to only hit "terror infra" and not uniformed terror infra, anything else is IT Celliya or paki pretending to be IT Celliya cope.

It's like couple of days back people were bashing babooze with phoren settled spawn, but if they had such clout in the first place, Op Sindoor wouldn't have happened, once Leaderji takes a decision, all these baboo{n}s have to obey.
 
No, >"we didn't hit paki military installations saar, wonly jihadi infrastructure" is literally the official Govt stance, IAF was told to only hit "terror infra" and not uniformed terror infra, anything else is IT Celliya or paki pretending to be IT Celliya cope.

It's like couple of days back people were bashing babooze with phoren settled spawn, but if they had such clout in the first place, Op Sindoor wouldn't have happened, once Leaderji takes a decision, all these baboo{n}s have to obey.

I know, I said that to drive the point across that he was insulting the professionalism of the IAF top brass with his drivel. Perhaps I should have been a little more... direct.
 
The US which a continuation of the British empire are the worst scum in the world. Trump has no control over the deep state and is just an egoistic asshole. As was again demonstrated, you can only trust them to stab you in the back.

They also tried to screw us in Bangladesh.

The QUAD is in name only.

We should never purchase any frontend weapons from them, also forget their engines.


View: https://x.com/sushantsareen/status/1922283439274746172?t=XmCOGqgo2m20y8tb6UB5Ow&s=19
 
I know, I said that to drive the point across that he was insulting the professionalism of the IAF top brass with his drivel. Perhaps I should have been a little more... direct.
In any case the point is now moot, since as Leaderji said, we will no longer differentiate between the Terrorists and Pakistani Military.
 
You have skirted the main question.
Can AWACS be used to guide ground launched SAM missiles.

What are the technical challenges to realize that capability. Will the acquisition of this capability offer some advantage.

There are different types of radars ranging from battlefield surveillance radars to massive Over the Horizon radars.
Not all radars are mobile or have to be mobile.

I talked about the enemy destroying Radars installations not taking out SAM'S in isolation.

There are Low Power Radars, Medium Power Radars and High Power Radars etc.

Their search and track range differs.Ranges can vary from a few kilometers to hundreds of kilometers. Not even talking about OTH radars here.

The enemy usually uses Anti Radiation Missiles to take out Medium and High Power Radars.

Would Pakistan not like to take out the Barak 8 or S400 radars thus rendering the Barak 8 missiles inoperative.

Suppose assume that after the main radar is destroyed our airborne AWACS can still guide Barak 8 missiles to counter Pakistani fighters and Air to Surface missiles like the Raad or Babur.

Normally we would have to wait for an replacement radar to make the Barak 8 system work again.

What about the MRSAM systems used to guard IAF Air Bases. The Air Base is a static installation.Do they need highly mobile SAM systems. Assume that the main radar of the Barak 8 system is destroyed. What happens now.

And even mobile radars can be targeted. The anti radiation missiles will follow the direction of the signals.You have to switch off the radar to disrupt the missile seeker. Or use decoys to mislead the seeker.

My question - should we even try to enable our AWACS to guide ground launched SAM's.
In a worst case scenario where the enemy manages to knock out our main radars.

And remember SAM'S are not ICBM's .Why do you need a gigantic launch complex to store and launch SAM'S. I have already said that the launch pads will be quite small and concealed/camouflaged.

No, AWACS are not meant for that. They are already overloaded to protect your air assets as it is, the last thing operators inside need is to guide ground launched SAM's. It will be technically very complex to do that in battle field scenario. It's not worth trying. No asset is safe during war. We need to have lot of redundancies for every one of them. That is why we have multi layered air defense system. We still have a long way to go. The recent skirmishes only has given a shot in the arm. We can do even better. That's what Project Kusha will address.
 
No, >"we didn't hit paki military installations saar, wonly jihadi infrastructure" is literally the official Govt stance, IAF was told to only hit "terror infra" and not uniformed terror infra, anything else is IT Celliya or paki pretending to be IT Celliya cope.

It's like couple of days back people were bashing babooze with phoren settled spawn, but if they had such clout in the first place, Op Sindoor wouldn't have happened, once Leaderji takes a decision, all these baboo{n}s have to obey.
And this another message from government.
______________
Terrorists & Pak Govt supporting terrorism are the same for us.


View: https://x.com/sidhant/status/1922235508635107729?t=qPEkGCGVB-E7XZdkzYx-pw&s=19
 
Trump will come and go.. He needs a win to show American relevance in today's multi polar world.
India must not make enemies with USA but convince Trump via trade deals and arms purchase.

Change the narrative, invest in Western media and thats not done by sending in Burkha and Allahbadia as we all have seen.

"A fool with a good tool is still a fool"
 
Ye baad me aaya, during Modi's 8 PM address, throughout the 4 days of Op Sindoor that MEA baboo was chanting "coomitted to de-escalation", "proportionate response" and "only terrorist infra, no paki military sites hit ".

by saying non-escalatory on upfront, any response by pakjabi army becomes the aggressor.
it is the MEA babus who will be driving next phase of op sindoor in UNSC and capitals of the world.
 
Trump will come and go.. He needs a win to show American relevance in today's multi polar world.
India must not make enemies with USA but convince Trump via trade deals and arms purchase.

Change the narrative, invest in Western media and thats not done by sending in Burkha and Allahbadia as we all have seen.

"A fool with a good tool is still a fool"

Trump is easily controlled, his cabinet did so in the first term and same now. Do trade with them but keep it transactional.

No matter who is in power, you will never recieve support from them against Porkies.

Porkies are the whores of both US and Chini. Look how both cried at their pain and rushed to save their bitch.

You can't be a power while relying on imports. So invest on a war footing and use Russian, French systems as a stop gap, never Ameriki.
 
Why the West Backed Pakistan’s Version in the Indo-Pak Mini-War

The West’s unquestioning acceptance of Pakistan’s narrative during the May 7–11 Indian military operations is baffling. Their response was muted when 26 Indian tourists were killed by Pakistani terrorists in Kashmir, yet they eagerly amplified Pakistan’s claims about India’s retaliation.
Western media reported, without verification, that five Indian jets were downed and that India’s S-400 system was destroyed—claims proven false when PM Modi publicly stood before the fully intact S-400 unit.

The only aspect they highlighted was India’s alleged strike on a Pakistani nuclear facility, dramatising it with exaggerated claims of Trump White House involvement, which was minimal. If they could report this, why ignore India’s destruction of nine other Pakistani military targets?

This selective and dishonest reporting exposes a deeper truth: the West is uncomfortable with India’s rise. All the praise is diplomatic window dressing—beneath it lies resentment.

Just as Trump bent over backwards to appease China in trade talks, handing them a win, he and others now display the same double standards with India.
 
Bursting fake Rafale propaganda.

Found this great piece of evidence and proof on LinkedIn, an unusual place. Don't see it getting discussed here or X that often. Please reshare.

Post: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/kara...p&rcm=ACoAABlLiAABc_ZIh7FCaSENfhFhQ--yLN2HXg4

**************************************************************************************************
Undisputed champion of hashtag#Disinformation ISPR, claimed on Wednesday May 7 2025 that they have downed hashtag#Rafale fighter jet. Their false claim was backed by a hardly trusted, mediocre news agency, CNN

Through open-source intelligence, we have enough evidence to ascertain that no such incident took place.

Martin-Baker Aircraft Co Ltd, which manufactures ejection seats for Rafale, diligently maintains a record of fighter jets, equipped with their ejection seats. Every time a pilot ejects, the Martin-Baker website updates its "Ejection Notices" section on https://martin-baker.com/
As per the last ejection notice (7789), the Finnish Defence Force-owned F/A-18C Hornet crashed on May 7th 2025.
Ejection notice 7788 was issued for US Airforce FA-18/C, which crashed into the Red Sea on May 6th.
It is hence proven that the IAF's Rafale fighter jet was not brought down by a Pakistani air-to-air missile.
**************************************************************************************************

As you can check on Martin Baker's website (https://martin-baker.com/ejection-notices/), there are no incidents of any ejection from a Rafale.

Martin Baker has previously reported ejections from indian aircrafts like Tejas

And these ejection notices are believed to be automatically updated.


So if all our pilots have returned safely and there are no ejections, it means no rafale shot down.
 
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top