Opinions and Discussion about Feminism.

[Vinod Patter]

If what you say is true, why do we not have incidents same as metros happening in dehats?

Coz Khap Panchayats give instant justice.

 

[spikey360]

Coz Khap Panchayats give instant justice.

Exactly . And this is what it means when I say, be a man.
But of course, even reading about this, beta orbiters will get instant burnol moment.

 

[spikey360]

this is incorrect.
First off, women are far, far better than men at customer service, which is a fundamental bedrock for a company's existence.
Secondly, as a nearly 20 year STEM professional veteran, i will say that pretty much all the women i have come across in STEM that are above the age of 25 currently, have pretty much the same competence as men, though they are much rarer due to fundamental preferences of the sexes.
I dunno what company or sector you work in, but in the world that i am familiar with - mathematics, engineering, compsci, the women i have come across, especially our asian behens, are exceedingly competent - also noticed the same for doctors, though i do find that women doctors talk way too much in general or are just straight up pissed off headmistresses.

Ever noticed how all you have written is I, I, I?
No offence, this is not about you.
This is about society and how reality is structured.

 

[spikey360]

first off, beating her or anyone wont do much to impress on them(or most people in fact) how wrong they were.

Friend, you need to get your basics correct. Any human, unless they are mentally deranged, is motivated by pain, rather the avoidance of pain. I am not advocating women beating. Beating anyone up is illegal, don't beat up a man either.
But stop myth-making about women being some high creatures. Yes everyone has a mother, and mothers are special individuals in everyone's life. But then, stop myth-making that every woman is your mother. If you really want to make that a reality, go ahead.
But for those of us who live in real world, the threat of violence or disturbance is and will always be a potent threat to make any crazy, man or woman, see reason.

 

[johny_baba]

Decriminalization of adultery helps men only. The previous laws were heavily biased against them.



'Observations' are irrelevant.



Them forming a 'comission' like that would constitute judicial overreach and set a bad precedent - any random Joe would then approach the courts seeking the formation of a comission on anything and everything. Milaards did well here.



Again, irrelevant. Milards always play to the gallery (who would not want a post retirement job at some law college in goraland?). Their observations do not set any legal precedent.



This gormint has mostly mantained the status quo on Hindu family/marital laws (they have been tinkering with M laws but that's not really relevant here). Which is why they have been opposing the petitions seeking introduction of 'marital rape' laws.

Make of it what you will.

ok bong

 

[Suryavanshi]

first off, beating her or anyone wont do much to impress on them(or most people in fact) how wrong they were.
Secondly, i see this as a common failings of both the sexes - women wanna prescribe 'women solutions' to men, men wanna prescribe 'men solutions' to women.
To most women, words and company matter far more than physical pain - they are also capable of tolerating a LOT more pain than men are plus tend to be more fragile than men, so even from pure stimulus POV, it doesnt go the same when you beat a woman vs when you beat a man. Men are more motivated by pain, because men tend to be more physical conflict driven in childhood and thats how men figure out social pecking orders for the most part.
Beating a woman wont get her to change her mind. ever. because women don't work that way. Women work via words mostly. Saying something cutting/snide

that will humiliate her in front of her friends and be words she remembers from a total stranger for years to come are far stronger tools in the arsenal.

My kids eye gets poked in by a whale. He is pressing his red eyes crying
The lady has no regret: "kicchu holo na, hath chepe thako thik hoye jabe", "Shut up, besi chilla chilli Korben na".
Gaud Naresh: You must give scatching remarks
*total bong diplomatic victory.

I don't get down to such discrimination and state stereotypes but how is this not a cuck behavior?

 

[johny_baba]

View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DDghxdFPS1H/

honourable former SC CJI chandrachud giving statement on late Atul Subhash' case;
WE DON'T KNOW OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY

 

[TringTringMonster]

My kids eye gets poked in by a whale. He is pressing his red eyes crying
The lady has no regret: "kicchu holo na, hath chepe thako thik hoye jabe", "Shut up, besi chilla chilli Korben na".
Gaud Naresh: You must give scatching remarks
*total bong diplomatic victory.

I don't get down to such discrimination and state stereotypes but how is this not a cuck behavior?

Gauda Naresh probably hasn't seen a woman vs woman fight. Rather scathing remarks, in most cases women are the first one to throw hands. Their fights are rather vicious. And many a time, they won't hestitate to slap a man twice their size. Then expect other men to defend or protect her. Anyway, scathing snide remarks have their time and place but this is not so in this case.

 

[TringTringMonster]

View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DDghxdFPS1H/

honourable former SC CJI chandrachud giving statement on late Atul Subhash' case;
WE DON'T KNOW OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY

Bro got PhD in yappology

 

[GaudaNaresh]

Friend, you need to get your basics correct. Any human, unless they are mentally deranged, is motivated by pain, rather the avoidance of pain. I am not advocating women beating. Beating anyone up is illegal, don't beat up a man either.
But stop myth-making about women being some high creatures. Yes everyone has a mother, and mothers are special individuals in everyone's life. But then, stop myth-making that every woman is your mother. If you really want to make that a reality, go ahead.
But for those of us who live in real world, the threat of violence or disturbance is and will always be a potent threat to make any crazy, man or woman, see reason.

its not myth-making about women being high creatures, its simply pointing out that most people, especially women, dont change their views based on some rando going apeshit on them and beating them up for whatever purpose.
thats the point. also, beating a woman gets them to hate you more than change for you is also a noted phenomena about beaten women, so there is that to consider. its simply about effectiveness and the right tool for the right job. which, in these case, are well placed and well chosen words.

 

[GaudaNaresh]

My kids eye gets poked in by a whale. He is pressing his red eyes crying
The lady has no regret: "kicchu holo na, hath chepe thako thik hoye jabe", "Shut up, besi chilla chilli Korben na".
Gaud Naresh: You must give scatching remarks
*total bong diplomatic victory.

I don't get down to such discrimination and state stereotypes but how is this not a cuck behavior?

you *start* with scathing remarks and then wait escalation. beating up a lady for her being careless will get your ass beaten/in jail in no time and for good measure. Thats the point. And wtf - i am saying onek beshi chella chilli kor, not throw hands...lol.
right place for right action.

 

[crazywithmath]

No it doesn't. Your assertion rests on the fact that adultery is amoral.

ok bong

Decriminalization of Adultery and the Duty and Discipline - Civilsdaily

The Supreme Court of India decriminalized adultery in 2018, but the Union of India sought clarification from the Court concerning its implementation in the armed forces.

www.civilsdaily.com

Some excerpts;

Law applicable to men only: Before the judgement, adultery was punishable by up to five years of imprisonment or a fine or both, and the law only applied to men who had sexual relations with someone's wife without the husband's consent.

Law did not consider women as an offender: The law did not consider a woman who had an affair with a married man as an offender or the husband as a victim.

It also pre-supposes that the husband whose wife is the adulterer does not deserve any form of justice.

They judgement agrees that it is a civil wrong that can be ground for divorce.


Too many of emotionally charged young men keep writing BS here without ever bothering to verify.

 

[johny_baba]

Decriminalization of Adultery and the Duty and Discipline - Civilsdaily

The Supreme Court of India decriminalized adultery in 2018, but the Union of India sought clarification from the Court concerning its implementation in the armed forces.

www.civilsdaily.com

Some excerpts;







They judgement agrees that it is a civil wrong that can be ground for divorce.


Too many of emotionally charged young men keep writing BS here without ever bothering to verify.

and now with decriminalisation there are rise of cases where pajeetas are openly whoring out and even plotting murders of their husbands, or drawing them and their families to suicide;
and evil men doing everything to woo such married pajeetas because they freely can without previous repercussions like before;
poolish and even courts throwing their hands because honourable former CJI made a remark after this decriminalisation;

but yes, making a ground for divorce is still there so it's fine, as per some bongbuddhi

 

[spikey360]

Decriminalization of Adultery and the Duty and Discipline - Civilsdaily

The Supreme Court of India decriminalized adultery in 2018, but the Union of India sought clarification from the Court concerning its implementation in the armed forces.

www.civilsdaily.com

Some excerpts;





Too many of emotionally charged young men keep writing BS here without ever bothering to verify.

Rather you should read some basic game theory books. What is the justice for the husband who wife keeps bedding other simps? The state and the society can atleast arrest those simps? But what you are propagating, tantamounts to let's not punish anyone.
If there is a penalty of one, for the promiscuity of both, atleast one of them will refrain and think about it twice.
I get it though, and although I hate to say this about members of this forums, we do have some members who are white knights.

 

[crazywithmath]

and now with decriminalisation there are rise of cases where pajeetas are openly whoring out and even plotting murders of their husbands, or drawing them and their families to suicide;
and evil men doing everything to woo such married pajeetas because they freely can without previous repercussions like before;
poolish and even courts throwing their hands because

Rather you should read some basic game theory books. What is the justice for the husband who wife keeps bedding other simps? The state and the society can atleast arrest those simps? But what you are propagating, tantamounts to let's not punish anyone.
If there is a penalty of one, for the promiscuity of both, atleast one of them will refrain and think about it twice.
I get it though, and although I hate to say this about members of this forums, we do have some members who are white knights.

> An adultery law heavily biased against men gets drafted
> Courts get overwhelmed with cases that end up destroying families
> Milaards and gormint agree to take it back
> Law gets taken back
> Adultery gets declared a valid ground for divorce
> This forum meanwhile;

honourable former CJI made a remark after this decriminalisation;

His remarks are as significant as yours on this forum.

but yes, making a ground for divorce is still there so it's fine, as per some bongbuddhi

Go ahead and petition for a Hindu version of sharia or whatever then, Gujjubuddhi.

 

[johny_baba]

Go ahead and petition for a Hindu version of sharia or whatever then, Gujjubuddhi.

@spikey360 here is your proof when i called him names with bong and all,

asking for fair laws that can penalise whoring pajeetas is akin to 'Hindu Sharia'

 

[crazywithmath]

@spikey360 here is your proof when i called him names with bong and all,

asking for fair laws that can penalise whoring pajeetas is akin to 'Hindu Sharia'

Nope.

Sharia is the only legal framework that currently constitutes provisions like that (but even those are getting tinkered with, remember triple talaq?) - hence, the term 'sharia or whatever'. You can term it something else if you want to.

Wonder why you ignored the rest of the post tho (like, why exactly is a law, that was heavily biased against men, getting taken back a problem for our esteemed gujju expert here).

 

[spikey360]

@spikey360 here is your proof when i called him names with bong and all,

asking for fair laws that can penalise whoring pajeetas is akin to 'Hindu Sharia'

I know I know.
I wrote in a post few pages ago, just going through thoughts like this can prove to be instant burnol moment for simps.

 

[spikey360]

Nope.

Sharia is the only legal framework that currently constitutes provisions like that (but even those are getting tinkered with, remember triple talaq?) - hence, the term 'sharia or whatever'. You can term it something else if you want to.

Wonder why you ignored the rest of the post tho (like, why exactly is a law, that was heavily biased against men, getting taken back a problem for our esteemed gujju expert here).

You probably functionally a woke woman. You argue like one. Being so politically correct and all. Abe ye sb nautanki choro, mard bano. Stand for eternal principles of humanity, not of simp-panzees

 

[crazywithmath]

You probably functionally a woke woman. You argue like one. Being so politically correct and all. Abe ye sb nautanki choro, mard bano. Stand for eternal principles of humanity, not of simp-panzees

I give a flying fuck about simps/simp-panzees (whatever the heck that is supposed to mean) and 'feminists' alike. Merely pointed out that the adultery laws got taken back because they were heavily heavily biased against men and were destroying families. This is when you and that other gujju guy got your panties in a twist.

Let us be clear from our learned chaddest galaxy brained Hindutvapilled 'mards' on this forum, do you want those laws back? Yes or No? If no, why are you even upset?

And I do not need to take life advice from some faceless nobody. Keep your 'mardness' to yourself. I am still being respectful here (I have probably never abused anybody on this forum), you are free to tag your fellow gujju 'mard' and circlejerk all you want but do not bother quoting me if you cannot talk civilized.