- Joined
- Jul 20, 2024
- Messages
- 150
- Likes
- 654
Two days and zero actiion and still this thread has jumped from the 91 pages ... back chowdi kam karo ...
Wake up babe new IT cell lore just dropped. The way these guys talk i wonder if they serve as comfort women in BJP quarters at night.
View: https://x.com/arunpudur/status/1918532014724268225?s=46
View: https://x.com/sidhant/status/1918567542752223272
Per this Wion patrakar, "indirect trade is huge"![]()
Lol check my previous msg on this thread and this msg you quoted nothing suggest i am paki loverYou mean we should just continue with MFN, open borders, trade, flights as usual etc etc with pakistan?
It's strange to see the haters here having such great love for Pakis!
Who would have imagined on an Indian defense forum we would see Paki lovers.
Also, pass a law forbidding employing Pakistani actors, singers and other artists, as well as cricket players in India..
Someone employed Fawad Khan.. and once Congress comes they will directly employ Pakis anyway..Their respective associations already do that.
Making a Law would invite the Milauds to strike it down citing whatever bullshit they do
Are we bold enough to conduct an attack when a president from an other country is visiting us.
Good One ! But then how we should deal with such situation like Pahelgam!I see paobhaji it cell has started spreading its narratives in boomer whatsapp groups. Looms like something that lawdus such as Gaurav Pradhan and bhiku Mhatre will come up with.
Wg Cdr Uday Kholatkar
"Kill them... destroy them... wipe them out... now only war is needed..."
Many such posts have come...
We have read them...
We have even expressed our anger...
Now, read this article.
Do not wear a crown you don't deserve.
Currently, India (Modi Government) absolutely does not need to launch any military action or attack Pakistan.
"The Pahalgam attack is part of a much larger conspiracy against India by foreign powers who do not want India to rise as an economic and global superpower."
Please note:
I do not believe that our army or government lacks the power to give a strong response.
Nor am I trying to demoralize them.
Article Title:
*"An Incomplete Conspiracy"*
If you find the logic reasonable, share it or discuss it.
Here’s the logic:
1. During the farmers' protest, foreign powers tried to create an unwanted conflict between the farmers and the government to trigger a civil war in India. The government handled it patiently, accepted some demands, and avoided the trap.
2. During the CAA protests (Shaheen Bagh and Delhi riots), foreign forces tried again to incite civil unrest. Modi's team handled the situation smartly, preventing the conspiracy from succeeding.
3. For a year, in Manipur, anti-national forces tried to provoke India into a civil war. Even though they dragged the issue into Parliament, the government solved it without firing a bullet.
4. For six months, mass killings of Hindus were happening in Bangladesh to provoke India into a war. However, the government understood the conspiracy and avoided the trap while taking necessary actions.
(Remember: even then, many of us were asking, "Why isn’t Modi taking action?")
Now, understand the current scenario:
1. Two weeks ago, the U.S. gave Pakistan $400 million aid.
2. 15 days ago, Pakistan's PM and Army Chief visited Saudi Arabia — why?
3. A month ago, Hamas leaders and top Pakistani terrorists met in PoK.
4. Three days ago, Pakistan’s Army Chief openly spewed venom against Hindus and Modi.
Now comes the Pahalgam attack.
Let's do a "retrospective operation" on this incident:
1. After a long time, terrorists targeted civilians, specifically Hindus — why?
To inflame Hindu-Muslim tensions and create civil war-like conditions in India.
1-A) Terrorists openly said: "Tell your Modi that we are killing Hindus."
Why didn't they target the army or police? Why directly name Modi?
Clearly, it was meant to hurt Hindu sentiments, trigger emotional responses, and provoke India into war.
2. At the time of the attack:
The U.S. Vice President was visiting India.
Modi was visiting Saudi Arabia.
(Notice the interconnections.)
3. An influential young Indian leader visited the U.S. a week ago.
To receive orders and guidance? (Future speeches and actions will reveal.)
5. U.S., Canada, Germany, France, and U.K. all told India:
"Whatever action you take, we support it."
Meaning: They want India to go to war to weaken India’s rising power.
6. Notice how all opposition parties, who earlier demanded "proof" during Balakot strikes, now say:
"We support any action Modi takes."
Translation: They want Modi to go to war, fail, and then they will grab power.
7. Pakistan too threatens that stopping water flow would be seen as an "act of war" — provoking India into conflict.
In short:
Foreign powers, India's opposition parties, and even Pakistan all want India to enter a war.
Their ultimate aim: weaken India internally, stop India's global rise, and push us back into 100 years of subjugation.
---
Now the most important point:
Late General Bipin Rawat warned that a "Half-Front" has emerged within India:
Traitors within the country working with foreign forces.
These are the same elements behind the farmers' protests, CAA riots, and communal violence.
If Modi engages in war, these forces would incite internal Hindu-Muslim riots, creating a civil war and stalling India's growth.
---
The Indian Army is capable of fighting Pakistan, Bangladesh, and China simultaneously.
But an internal civil war would tie their hands.
And that's exactly what anti-India forces want.
---
Solution:
We, the citizens, must not create unnecessary pressure for war.
We must not fall for foreign media propaganda.
We must trust Modi and the government to take action at the right time.
They know what strategy to adopt.
Even without war, India can make Pakistan suffer — e.g., by cutting off water.
---
If you find any truth in this analysis, please spread awareness about the conspiracy against Modi, Sanatan Dharma, and India.
No, the point is that these measures (like permanently suspending trade, closing borders, etc.) should've been done long ago during Uri or Pulwama.You mean we should just continue with MFN, open borders, trade, flights as usual etc etc with pakistan?
It's strange to see the haters here having such great love for Pakis!
Who would have imagined on an Indian defense forum we would see Paki lovers.
No, the point is that these measures (like permanently suspending trade, closing borders, etc.) should've been done long ago during Uri or Pulwama.
These stunts cannot be considered as the sole response when 26 Hindu citizens are shot down.
Anyway, I still believe we will see some tangible military action (maybe this month, maybe in the winter).