Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack

Ya'll Nibbiars see the second clause, lol.

1000022880.webp
 
1000022881.webp
 
JConline said:
This sounds well.........stupid.
Why would you develop a weapon system whose primary drawback is that it's volley of payloads, launched at the same time will almost certainly give away its position to the enemy which is conventional army in this case. India already has MUCH better alternatives to that. For instance, SCALP missiles launched from Rafales would be less detectable, way more devastating and more accurate than any MBRL system in the market right now.
Now coming to the question of why we haven't acted upon this if we have the required arsenal. You have to understand that escalation has levels. In a conflict there is vertical escalation and horizontal escalation. In this conflict between nuclear armed nations, unchecked vertical escalation can cause nuclear war ffs! You can't just bomb the headquarters of a nuclear state and expect to get away with it, dude!
And please PLEASE keep in mind that for better or for worse, India is not the US. We don't hold the unequivocal right to be a global asshole. Our civilizational history is the basis for our very core values and Indians for one know how to fix things with finesse. And trust me, we as civilians know barely 1% of what tactical finesse is.
Click to expand...
Please don't use adjectives like 'stupid'. Using any form of abuse even if very mild in nature means that you don't have convincing logical arguments.

First the Chinese have the MBRL systems like the PHL- 16 and the PCL- 191 which have ranges from 350 to 500 kms.
If the PLA has seen sense in developing these very long range MBRL systems, you cannot call the professionals in the PLA stupid for their efforts.

You personally may not agree with the idea. Fine, but don't use words like stupid to artificially inflate your IQ level.

If you want an American type response 'I care a damn about your arguments'.

The idea per se is technically feasible.

The flowery statement that 'you can't just bomb the headquarters of a nuclear state' shows that you are chicken hearted. Okay, I respect your opinion but please don't deride the opinion of others.

For God's sake - You cannot win the war by by bombing the Rawalpindi GHQ of the Pakistan Army. Its more about delivering psychological blows to the enemy and degrade his morale.

If we want to end this diplomatically we can say
'we agree to disagree'
Or if you prefer an exchange of abuses, so be it.
 
silentassassin265 said:
Millitary headquarters are usually underground bunkers. If taking down a headquarter was so easy zelensky wouldn't be alive today
Click to expand...
The objective is not to wipe out the entire Pakistan Army leadership.
You cannot win the war by simply bombing Pak army GHQ.
It is to demoralise them and expose their vulnerability.
More psychological warfare.
 
Sanglamorre said:
Hopefully it was a psyop and not an actual retired personnel who asked why didn't civilians without any combat training start their Hero arc.

Because all it would happen is you'd get shot by the second or third guy.
Click to expand...
No it's actually worse than that.

Please go through the sequence of events.

Men with guns show up. Ask the men to stand apart from their wife and kids. Ask religion.

Hindu.

Shoot the man.

Then state explicitly that we are not going to harm women and children. Some perverse morality. State it loud enough for all to hear.

Now the men have 2 choices.

Either comply and die silent, with a large probability of survival of your wife and kids.

Or show herogiri and wrestle with the terrorists, causing the terrorists to shoot your wife and kids in front of you before they shoot you.

And the larger is the no of men they shoot, leaving the women and children alone, the greater is the incentive for the rest of men to choose option 1.

So, all you bachelor dreams of Rambogiri, shove them up your bunghole. Because it's easy for you to say when it's just your life. This is a choice that puts even their wife and children's lives at risk, and that's a whole other equation to solve.

For all of you saying they would do this and that, I have no shame in saying that I would have done the same thing all of these men did.

They chose to die without fighting in the hope of keeping their wife and kids safe. Every single one of these men already knew they were dead when the first shot was fired.

They just chose the life of their family over their pride.

Which is the hardest choice to make for a man.

If I have to face a choice like that, I hope I choose the same. I just hope the Gods give me the strength to die without begging and with the name of Narayana on my lips.
 
I
Roshan said:
Another fellow who was also an Army man showed the presence of mind and calm head which saved a few more lives. He had some luck too because he was late but still didnt' act like a headless chicken.

View: https://x.com/prasannabhat38/status/1915648157595427233
Click to expand...

i don’t understand, even military wala are such foolish people that they are going to Kashmir with family. No wonder modern Hindus don’t have survival instincts and shatrubodh.
Indian bureaucracy and leadership (be it militarily and civilian) is bunch of people who are only for perks and not for duty.
 
Okabe Rintarou said:
Bruh... check distance from LOC near Poonch to GHQ. Pinaka 2 can handle it, why 350km?
Click to expand...
I assume that you have done the maths right.
I took the distance from the Punjab border.
Thanks. Good if our Pinaka mk2 can do the job.
The naked underlying truth/reality is that most of Pakistan's important installations are within MBRL range.
They are very vulnerable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Azaad
  • Sticky
Islamic Extremism in India : News , Discussions & Updates.
35 36 37
Replies
727
Views
23K
Hindaviswarajya
H
haldilal
Islamic Invasion of Bharat
Replies
0
Views
60
haldilal
haldilal

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Back
Top