Russian Ukrainian War

Footage of a massive breakthrough by a Russian mechanized group in the area of the village of Malaya Tokmachka in the Orekhov direction. The goal of the breakthrough was to enter the eastern outskirts of the village of Malaya Tokmachka and land troops, which was ultimately achieved. In such a large battle, losses of equipment are naturally inevitable, this is shown in the video. It is worth noting that in this area, the Ukrainian army had a well-organized defense and the Zaporizhzhya section of the front was considered stable. The exact type of Russian equipment used could not be determined due to the poor quality of the video. It was reported that 15 armored vehicles and about 20 light vehicles were used, including ATVs, buggies and motorcycles. The Russian mechanized group used tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, BMDs and armored personnel carriers, the equipment is equipped with protection against drones. To repel the attack, the Ukrainian army used FPV drones and artillery. The Ukrainian army is reportedly planning a counterattack. The video is shortened and shows the use of equipment and the landing of troops.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9maA3AFcKo
 
Unfortunately for your nazi idealogy addled brain it is hard to recognize that it is not Trump that is sacrificing the flower of your youth at the altar of greed (and selling their organs for profit). Trump is actually trying to save them.
Now I understand where so many supercars appeared on our roads from. :D

View: https://x.com/kowalskydonetsk/status/1908150941854908783

I don't trust Trump any more than I trust you. Say hello to Witkoff. We call him in the Russian manner: Витьков (Vitkov) .
 
Last edited:
Neither Ukraine or Russia wants peace. Trump knows that and is ready to move on. He has an easy way out, blame both sides and simply tell the truth that neither wants peace. The western media will blame it all on Russia and Trump and claim the peace loving Ukrainians weren't at fault. The first option isn't going to happen, just wishful thinking. The 2nd is almost certain to happen.

Back in Paris, Rubio hinted at a possible second, more likely, option.

“It’s not our war. We didn’t start it. The United States has been helping Ukraine for the past three years and we want it to end, but it’s not our war,” Rubio stressed, alluding to the possibility that the US could simply walk away, leaving Ukraine and its European backers to face Russia alone.

That would pose a huge challenge, given Ukraine’s depleted resources and Europe’s dire unreadiness, currently, to bolster the front lines with sufficient military supplies of its own."

first option
(One option might be redouble US military support for Ukraine. Despite Trump’s efforts to court the Kremlin, or perhaps because of them, Russian intransigence has emerged as the main obstacle to peace, such as Moscow’s foot-dragging over Trump’s proposed 30-day ceasefire, to which Ukraine alone has agreed.

Admittedly, fresh deliveries of billions of dollars more of American arms to Ukraine may be an unpopular policy U-turn among some Trump supporters, but a newly invigorated Ukrainian push-back on the battlefield could encourage the Kremlin to reassess its negotiating position.)

 
Neither Ukraine or Russia wants peace. Trump knows that and is ready to move on. He has an easy way out, blame both sides and simply tell the truth that neither wants peace. The western media will blame it all on Russia and Trump and claim the peace loving Ukrainians weren't at fault. The first option isn't going to happen, just wishful thinking. The 2nd is almost certain to happen.

Back in Paris, Rubio hinted at a possible second, more likely, option.

“It’s not our war. We didn’t start it. The United States has been helping Ukraine for the past three years and we want it to end, but it’s not our war,” Rubio stressed, alluding to the possibility that the US could simply walk away, leaving Ukraine and its European backers to face Russia alone.

That would pose a huge challenge, given Ukraine’s depleted resources and Europe’s dire unreadiness, currently, to bolster the front lines with sufficient military supplies of its own."

first option
(One option might be redouble US military support for Ukraine. Despite Trump’s efforts to court the Kremlin, or perhaps because of them, Russian intransigence has emerged as the main obstacle to peace, such as Moscow’s foot-dragging over Trump’s proposed 30-day ceasefire, to which Ukraine alone has agreed.

Admittedly, fresh deliveries of billions of dollars more of American arms to Ukraine may be an unpopular policy U-turn among some Trump supporters, but a newly invigorated Ukrainian push-back on the battlefield could encourage the Kremlin to reassess its negotiating position.)

Trump said it personally: https://www.reuters.com/video/watch/idRW767318042025RP1/
-- And, for sure, how will he forget his favorite boasting:"My whole life has been one big negotiation and I know when people are playing us and I know when they're not..."
 
Yesterday I learned that Russia has 3,300 tanks (from T-10M to T-90M) on the entire front. Outdated tanks are not such a shame - it is better to have a T-10M or T-55A than to have no tank at all. Tank duels are rare, and an armored firing point is always needed.
Destroyed T-55A
photo_2025-04-18_11-30-42.webp
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top