Russian Ukrainian War

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x
We will know when this is a real war in the eyes of Russia. They will destroy the bridges (including rail bridges) cutting off a third of Ukraine. I always wondered why they didn't do this years ago, now I know why.

View: https://x.com/RealPepeEscobar/status/1931635664996434427

The SMO might be upgrades to a CTO (Counter Terrorist Operation) https://news-pravda.com/usa/2025/06/05/1397430.html I very much doubt they would implement most of these.

A brief summary of CTO legal implications:

• FSB officers become part of the command structure of the military operation and participate in military planning and decision making at the highest levels.

• A new central operational command is created, staffed by officers from the FSB alongside those of the Ministry of Defence and Interior ministry.

• Conscripted soldiers may be utilised in combat operations (not just mobilized reservists).

• Security services may requisition property of citizens such as personal vehicles, warehouses etc for CTO use.

• Strict powers of control over the exchange of information.

• Communication means may be disconnected by security services without notice.

• Unimpeded access to any CTO employee into any premises in Russia without the need for legal warrant.

• Restrictions on freedom of movement.

• Employees of FSB, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Emergency Situations and others, become part of the CTO.

• Expanded powers to security forces in who may be designated a hostile combatant. This opens the door to targeted destruction of non-military individuals.

The last point is very important, because it creates the legal framework under which Ukrainian government officials may be deliberately targeted and destroyed, including but not limited to Zelensky himself.
 
We will know when this is a real war in the eyes of Russia. They will destroy the bridges (including rail bridges) cutting off a third of Ukraine. I always wondered why they didn't do this years ago, now I know why.

View: https://x.com/RealPepeEscobar/status/1931635664996434427

What a clown statement if you are not in war then country against whom you launched smo casualy destroy your nuclear delivery platform , attacks nuclear submarine base , sinks your naval ship , attack you inside your own country still somehow you are not at war he should just directly say he is kuck next time
 
We will know when this is a real war in the eyes of Russia. They will destroy the bridges (including rail bridges) cutting off a third of Ukraine. I always wondered why they didn't do this years ago, now I know why.

View: https://x.com/RealPepeEscobar/status/1931635664996434427


This is a dumb view. It reels of our 'attack on terrorists ' line.

You are allowing weapons to flow in so that you can call it a SMO. Similarly, we didn't to SEAD because we wanted to claim we only wanted to call it anti-terror ops.
 
What a clown statement if you are not in war then country against whom you launched smo casualy destroy your nuclear delivery platform , attacks nuclear submarine base , sinks your naval ship , attack you inside your own country still somehow you are not at war he should just directly say he is kuck next time
I study semantics and I have to agree with you. The west has it's own form of distorting reality with a bullshit narrative, and so does Russia. Normally I would take it as a grain of salt, but this thing escalated a lot, and it looks like it will escalate a lot more. So it's not all empty words.
 

View: https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1931981918020526452

Why hasn't Russia placed ZU-23-2 & Shilka around their cities and vulnerable points? I think they should be able to defend against such drone attacks more effectively. Russia is supposed to have an IADS setup which should be able to direct AD guns.


May be there are radar gaps in long Ukraine Russia border . Those legacy soviet systems did excellent complementary job against 500/600 turkish drones , mlrs at LOC . May be they don't have the numbers to cover . But still these drones getting to travel 1000 km inside Russia is surprising .
 
We will know when this is a real war in the eyes of Russia. They will destroy the bridges (including rail bridges) cutting off a third of Ukraine. I always wondered why they didn't do this years ago, now I know why.

View: https://x.com/RealPepeEscobar/status/1931635664996434427

Russians wanted to capture Ukraine intact. So that, they would not have to rebuild the entire country. Now, it looks like, it is dawning on them them that taking Ukraine intact is perhaps not possible.
 
Residents of Cheboksary have published footage of attacks by Ukrainian An-196 Lyutyi kamikaze UAVs. The VNIIR-Progress plant, which produces jam-proof GLONASS antennas used in cruise missiles and drones, was attacked. Reportedly, two drones hit the roof of the plant, which temporarily halted production. Judging by the video, one Lyutyi drone was shot down by the Russian Pantsir-S1 air defense system, and there may be more. It is worth noting that air defense systems cannot function properly in urban areas, and one Pantsir-S1 air defense system is clearly not enough for protection. The Lyutyi kamikaze UAV is made of fiberglass


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHp8maiSbqs
 

View: https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1931981918020526452

Why hasn't Russia placed ZU-23-2 & Shilka around their cities and vulnerable points? I think they should be able to defend against such drone attacks more effectively. Russia is supposed to have an IADS setup which should be able to direct AD guns.

Exactly!

I mentioned this after Murmansk and Irkutsk attacks. Russia needs SRR to act as sensors backed by AA guns. This should be their last line of defense as far as aerial threats are concerned. This should be installed on every important facility inside Russia.

I am assuming, they have adequate counter measures to address such threats as airplanes and missiles. Also, I am assuming they have sensors to monitor against potential ground based sabotage attempts.
 
Russians wanted to capture Ukraine intact. So that, they would not have to rebuild the entire country. Now, it looks like, it is dawning on them them that taking Ukraine intact is perhaps not possible.
Could be
But in return they are getting their own country destroyed.
Putin is never getting Ukraine intact he will either have to ruin Ukraine like gaza or end the war
 
Yesterday I heard that the Ukrainian air defense missile system "Kilchen" (analogous to the Patriot and S-400) has been guarding the Ukrainian skies for several months now.
 
The Russian army has used the new kamikaze drone "Klin" for the first time. to destroy the Ukrainian naval drone MAGURA in the Black Sea. The new kamikaze drone is equipped with an air-burst warhead, providing a wider area of destruction. There is no technical information on the drone. The drone's control interface is similar to the Lancet drones from ZALA. It is quite possible that this is a new modification of the Lancet drones.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThWF68G6QMw
 
There has been a been a surge in investor optimism in Europe, want to guess why? You guessed it, it's driven by European government's push to increase military spending and revive a sluggish private equity market. And guess who's behind it? Blackstone. Blackstone and Blackrock are the greatest frenemy story ever told. https://gcalhoun.wordpress.com/2025...-wall-street-frenemy-story-ever-told-barrons/

It seems to be to be a hedged bet. If Ukraine losses Blackrock losses it's investment, but look at all the money they make investing in Europe's increase in military spending. Hedging is done all the time. Future contracts are nothing more then hedging, or an insurance policy. They basically mean the same thing.
 
Last edited:
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top