It is clear that you do not have a video of forced mobilization. Such cases happen and they are not uncommon but they are 5-6 cases per week, not per day.
They are very vivid with those who evaded confirmation of data and are now caught.
There are excesses. Recently, the TCC took away a driver who had a son with an acute form of cerebral palsy in the back seat. He did not need confirmation, but he did not have a document from the TCC, so the perpetrators took him away without sorting things out. The public intervened and let him go.
We closely monitor abuse of power, so I asked where such information came from?
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/s/CFR5yf21e7
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/s/LEi4w9GDJ6
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/s/5bJe7doskt
All from last 12 hours and only from "Hot" section, so doesn't include all possible posted videos. I see 5-6 such videos daily. And these are only the recorded ones. Who knows how many are not recorded.
By the way, this is also about armored vehicles. Have you seen many videos where Ukrainian troops massively use motorcycles and cars? Indeed, Ukrainian assault companies on motorcycles are now being created, but mainly all this is used for logistics.
Armor definitely saves lives, some units of military equipment can withstand up to 10 hits. Civilian equipment for a military man is a definite suicide bomber.
I already told you that the goal is to destroy the enemy's military power.
Though there is no doubt Russian losses of armour would have been large. I don't think that is the prime reason for using motorcycles. I don't remember using cars for assaut though, ATVs? Yes. Armour use has declined everywhere on the front for assault as far as recent videos show. I think more likely reason for that is motorcyles & ATVs offer protection from drones, which is mainly the Russian troops face during assault.
Troops on motorcycle & ATVs are dispersed, hence more drones are needed to attack them all. Soldiers riding them can also maneuver easily to dodge drones. Also they are lightweight, hence offer more protection from mines. I have seen videos of Ukrainias adopting them too in recent attacks.
Also despite that, Russian attacks have accelerated recently, so have their capture of territory.
Our army does not cling to positions if there is no point in holding them. The Russian army is the opposite. Territory is an ideological underpinning. That is why they sacrifice everything they can. And they attack even on bathtubs. There is a reason for this - to bring more and unload easier, but it looks ridiculous.
C'mon man, that is ridiculous. Whole of the war, it is Ukraine which has been fixated with territory, refusing to withdraw before the situation turns critical while Russians have withdrawn, rather than taking massive losses. Russians withdrew from Kharkiv & Kherson when their logistics was challenged and they were outnumbered. OTOH, Ukrainans fought till near encirclement in Bakhmut, Sudhza (Kursk), Avdiivka, Velya Novosilka etc etc. There are more examples.
For example: Now in the Tyotkino-town area (Kursk region) an entire Russian regiment is half-encircled, but there is no order to retreat and the regiment is destroyed. In such a situation, Ukrainian troops often retreat to reserve positions.
Therefore, I am surprised when they say that time is against us. The Chinese asked not to attack Red Square on May 9. A year ago, one could only dream of such an opportunity.
Ukrainians have claimed encirclement in Tetkino. However, there has been no update on this front for some days. Lets see. Anyways I think attacking Russian territory is useless for Ukraine. They should focus on attriting Russians in Ukraine itself, where their logistics is strong and they have air cover and fortified defences.
Rest, we will see what happens and who prevails in the long term. I don't dislike Ukraine or Russia, just thought that current Ukrainian strategy seem to have no end goal in mind.