Sinking State of Bangladesh: Idiotic Musings

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x
Does Anyone have any idea what is going on in Bangladesh and Myanmar? There are reports of US army men entering in Kangludesh. It is before OP Sindoor. Recently some news are floating around about heavy cargo shipment from US to Kanglu land. Also, our security forces just a few days back shot dead nearly a dozen armed infiltrators on the border with myanmar.

I suspect a new state is being carved out from Myanmar. Will it be a christian nation? Would it not affect our north eastern states too?

They are supporting the Arakan( buddhist tribe ) Army with supplies to take over Sittwe and a few other Junta controlled port towns/cities.

They are also supporting a Rohinya jihadi group called ARSA for the same objective.
It just so happens the Arakanese boodists and Rohingyas hate each other :troll:

You can follow this author, all his articles are about this US-Kanglu ((( arrangement ))) only

There is no christian nation but they want to take over all of Myanmmar so that they can ungli China via their southern border and also ungli India if necessary using the Christian oogah boogahs in Myannmar, ref the current Cookie crisis in Moneypoor
 
They are supporting the Arakan( buddhist tribe ) Army with supplies to take over Sittwe and a few other Junta controlled port towns/cities.

They are also supporting a Rohinya jihadi group called ARSA for the same objective.
It just so happens the Arakanese boodists and Rohingyas hate each other :troll:

You can follow this author, all his articles are about this US-Kanglu ((( arrangement ))) only

There is no christian nation but they want to take over all of Myanmmar so that they can ungli China via their southern border and also ungli India if necessary using the Christian oogah boogahs in Myannmar, ref the current Cookie crisis in Moneypoor
I don't understand if they wanna ungli china how are they allowing China to build a base in kangladesh? I don't understand this 4D chess by burgerchods..
 
I don't understand if they wanna ungli china how are they allowing China to build a base in kangladesh? I don't understand this 4D chess by burgerchods..

Because it only means India is on the receiving end of Ungli.

Kangladesh is only a condom with which Uncle Sam will penetrate the Burmese Junta and then let the Aung San Suu Kyi and Ooogah Boogahs regime rule as a puppet state.

Once this is done, Chong can use Kangludesh against India, Uncle Sam ke liye benefit hi hai.

Make no mistake, this is not some precision guided scheme to hurt China only, it is two birds with one stone, we are the other bird.

The over 9000 christian oogah boogah tribes fighting the junta in Burma have Jaat-Bhois over here also, you will see many Moneypoor style spillovers especially in Mizoram.

If muh Chrischun Unity is promoted by Uncle Sam over the natural tribal animosities, they may even stitch up an alliance between Chins( Mizo, Cookie etc ) and Naga to do a "jungle crusade" against the Indian state assuming they capture Burma.
 
Because it only means India is on the receiving end of Ungli.

Kangladesh is only a condom with which Uncle Sam will penetrate the Burmese Junta and then let the Aung San Suu Kyi and Ooogah Boogahs regime rule as a puppet state.

Once this is done, Chong can use Kangludesh against India, Uncle Sam ke liye benefit hi hai.

Make no mistake, this is not some precision guided scheme to hurt China only, it is two birds with one stone, we are the other bird.

The over 9000 christian oogah boogah tribes fighting the junta in Burma have Jaat-Bhois over here also, you will see many Moneypoor style spillovers especially in Mizoram.

If muh Chrischun Unity is promoted by Uncle Sam over the natural tribal animosities, they may even stitch up an alliance between Chins( Mizo, Cookie etc ) and Naga to do a "jungle crusade" against the Indian state assuming they capture Burma.


Unga bunga will handled if necessary based on our current Naxal hunting. Drone surveillance followed by overwhelming forces surrounding them and forcing them into key areas where we will slaughter.

If Mizoram think about some thing fishy. Aizawal bombing will be done again.
 
They are supporting the Arakan( buddhist tribe ) Army with supplies to take over Sittwe and a few other Junta controlled port towns/cities.

They are also supporting a Rohinya jihadi group called ARSA for the same objective.
It just so happens the Arakanese boodists and Rohingyas hate each other :troll:

You can follow this author, all his articles are about this US-Kanglu ((( arrangement ))) only

There is no christian nation but they want to take over all of Myanmmar so that they can ungli China via their southern border and also ungli India if necessary using the Christian oogah boogahs in Myannmar, ref the current Cookie crisis in Moneypoor
Because it only means India is on the receiving end of Ungli.

Kangladesh is only a condom with which Uncle Sam will penetrate the Burmese Junta and then let the Aung San Suu Kyi and Ooogah Boogahs regime rule as a puppet state.

Once this is done, Chong can use Kangludesh against India, Uncle Sam ke liye benefit hi hai.

Make no mistake, this is not some precision guided scheme to hurt China only, it is two birds with one stone, we are the other bird.

The over 9000 christian oogah boogah tribes fighting the junta in Burma have Jaat-Bhois over here also, you will see many Moneypoor style spillovers especially in Mizoram.

If muh Chrischun Unity is promoted by Uncle Sam over the natural tribal animosities, they may even stitch up an alliance between Chins( Mizo, Cookie etc ) and Naga to do a "jungle crusade" against the Indian state assuming they capture Burma.

My response to a similar post in a different forum.

There's a context to the US meddling there though. Initially they wanted to turn the Quad into a NATO like alliance. The only hold our was India.

The idea was to use India as a base for operations to open up a second front against China if need be.

Since India declined & Nepal couldn't be approached independent of India for such operations they decided on a sub optimal solution - Bangladesh.

We saw what happened there so now comes an even more sub optimal solution - Myanmar.

IMO we shouldn't do anything except keep a close eye on the unfolding situation there. The US's first target here isn't the Tatmadaw , it's the CCP. The Tatmadaw is only a hinderance .

If they don't interfere in the US operation the US would be most happy to leave them alone. I suspect that's exactly what the Tatmadaw will do. In any case their hold over the north of Myanmar is extremely tenuous as this recent map below shows -

images (27).webp

In case the CCP goads them they may make an attempt to take on the US & the guerrilla forces there fighting on behalf of the US but it'd be more of shadow boxing TBH.

We should emulate the Tatmadaw & keep quiet while increasing our vigilance there. The US is there to open up a second front in Yunnan. That's exactly the province we'd be facing the brunt of the Chinese attack from as opposed to Tibet & Xinjiang.

A US base there even if it doesn't house something like the F-35 but say a Patriot or THAAD battery with appropriate radars will be an enormous headache for the PLAAF.

This can actually be beneficial to us since we lack the wherewithal to intervene directly in Myanmar especially if we don't want to attract all kinds of negative attention including from the CCP itself.

Our problems along with the Tatmadaw with the US presence there will arise after the Chinese problem has been firmly dealt with but by that time it'd be a completely different world.
 
A US base there even if it doesn't house something like the F-35 but say a Patriot or THAAD battery with appropriate radars will be an enormous headache for the PLAAF.
I don't think India would want THAAD or any kind of US area ADS near our NE borders. In the long term, it will pose grave consequences.
 
I don't think India would want THAAD or any kind of US area ADS near our NE borders. In the long term, it will pose grave consequences.
Your assumption is in a Sino US war whoever wins will emerge relatively unscathed. It'd be a Pyrrhic victory. Nothing more nothing less. Kicking out the US assuming it wins against China then won't even be necessary.

They themselves would withdraw much like the Brits lost the stomach for a confrontation with us post WW-2 & scrammed.
 
E14yVbNUYAEVN3j.jpg
 
Unga bunga will handled if necessary based on our current Naxal hunting. Drone surveillance followed by overwhelming forces surrounding them and forcing them into key areas where we will slaughter.

If Mizoram think about some thing fishy. Aizawal bombing will be done again.
I think we have enough state capacity to handle these oonga boonga. Only worry is our political will which till modi is at helm, is taken care of. Its just that INC will readily shed control over these oonga boonga land for muh human rights.
 
Your assumption is in a Sino US war whoever wins will emerge relatively unscathed. It'd be a Pyrrhic victory. Nothing more nothing less. Kicking out the US assuming it wins against China then won't even be necessary.

They themselves would withdraw much like the Brits lost the stomach for a confrontation with us post WW-2 & scrammed.
All those points are valid assuming US would go into a head on war against China. However, I don't think US will ever wanna go into a head-on battle with China. It would prefer to push India to the battle first to severely cripple China before going into the war.

Once the Airavata called India and Ahi called China battle each other untill both are almost half dead. The bald vulture that feasts on the dead bodies on the battlefield called USA would not appear. Once both countries are at their weakest it will appear to feast upon their carcasses while they are half alive.
 
Last edited:
Actor who played the role of Sheikh Hasina in a movie is sent to jail for murder, +10 democracy ranking to Economist's cunt-ry of the year

 
All those points are valid assuming US would go into a head on war against China. However, I don't think US will ever wanna go into a head-on battle with China. It would prefer to push India to the battle first to severely cripple China before going into the war.

Once the Airavata called India and Ahi called China battle each other untill both are almost half dead. The bald vulture that feasts on the dead bodies on the battlefield called USA would not appear. Once both countries are at their weakest it will appear to feast upon their carcasses while they are half alive.
That's the original plan which is the reason the US tried to inveigle us into a NATO type Alliance seeking to convert the Quad into a defensive alliance. We declined.

The idea being we don't want to unnecessarily provoke China like Ukraine did Russia. However I'm not sure if this act actually insulates us from Chinese action. IMO it would actually embolden them since we're not committed to a defence alliance .

Any action across the LAC won't be confined there & has the potential into spiralling much beyond what the Chinese imagined the way it would turn out. Yet in spite of all these factors I've no doubt in my mind the Chinese will definitely come calling.

Can't blame the Indian leadership here. They're trying their best to avoid a confrontation. However blame will definitely be apportioned to our leadership for poor defence preparedness viz poor budgeting , apathy to the actual needs of the armed forces especially the IAF , not undertaking privatisation of the various DPSUs , poor leadership & lack of depth in thinking on strategic matters as far as China goes , etc.

We're still in denial mode as far as China goes. The objective seems to be denial is deterrence as opposed to building up deterrence.

Finally the US will definitely go head on against China. They've far more vital allies like Japan RoK Australia etc apart from Taiwan obviously who'd abandon the US & cut deals with the CCP if they perceive the US as being diffident to China. Of course Taiwan has no choice in the matter.

The EU if it is convinced the US is abandoning its role as the final arbiter in a global order essentially constructed by them , they'd cut a deal with China. That'd be signalling the rest of the world to follow suit. The US can't afford this no matter how foolish or isolationist their administration is. Now now not in another decade. It's basically riding a tiger in a different sense.
 
Last edited:
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top