Türkiye: News, Discussions & Updates.

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x
Ukrainian support on design not on material side. Our 3rd gen single crystal blades can withstand 1650-1700 degree Celsius.
Yes,Tei has its own fadec!

LMAO, this is a turbocharged diesel engine, not an afterburning gas turbine.

There's literally nothing in common in managing a piston engine and a turbine.

Look you timelines are too ridiculous to be taken seriously. And all the assembly you've done for GE means nothing when developing on your own. You cannot use a bolt which was specified for GE engines, forget SCBs.

withstand 1650-1700 degree Celsius
It's Kelvin, not Celcius.
 
Slow claps guys. They have done it. They reverse engineered the Honeywell CTS800.
It only shows that our engines better in same weight class in terms of thrust and fuel consumption!! And in the video it mentions single crystal Technology, nickel alloys etc. watch that parts and see who is already taken leaps that other waiting to take!!
 
By your logic it's ok if they throw a punch or two on behalf of Paxtan while the latter does all the heavy lifting & we ought to be forgiving coz , hey , what's two punches when we've faced 100 from the Paxtanis.

I'm convinced you're a true Nepali .
Turkey lags behind India by approximately 35 years in turbofan engine technology. However, as a NATO member, Turkey benefits from alliance support, while India is independently working to develop a military-industrial complex that meets NATO standards.
 
LMAO, this is a turbocharged diesel engine, not an afterburning gas turbine.

There's literally nothing in common in managing a piston engine and a turbine.

Look you timelines are too ridiculous to be taken seriously. And all the assembly you've done for GE means nothing when developing on your own. You cannot use a bolt which was specified for GE engines, forget SCBs.


It's Kelvin, not Celcius.
Source?
The values that I mention is Celsius not kelvin!! With out single crystal you may reach 1400-1450 kelvin !
 
There is data sheet, check taht one and see more than 100 parts produced.
And watch this video with subtitles!

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-xqtsYknUJY&pp=ygUQVGVpIG1haG11dCBha3NpdNIHCQmwCQGHKiGM7w%3D%3D

OK .. I watched the video .. So you produce parts for RR engines.. Which is not insignificant .. However I did not see a single moving hot engine section part in the entire video ..
All this is with beign a NATO member and with proximity to europe.
So as per my viewing TEI does the same work that TASL does here .
And indeed all you do is do MRO for the f110 there is not a single source to suggest that you manufacture the f110.
You claim that you are ahead of us which is laughable. Our engine has flown on foreign test beds and has achieved its performance benchmarks. The kaveri has had problems that again had to be tested in foreign test facilities and have its problems fixed. All this was done painstakingly over many years through sanctions after 1998 nuclear tests and other restrictions.
And all you have are renders and a timeline. Nobody here is impressed by your boasts.
 
It only shows that our engines better in same weight class in terms of thrust and fuel consumption!! And in the video it mentions single crystal Technology, nickel alloys etc. watch that parts and see who is already taken leaps that other waiting to take!!
Turkey does not have an indigenous turbofan engine, and it will take at least 30 years to develop a functional one. Whether it will meet the required standards remains to be seen. Comparing Turkey’s engine program with India’s, which has been developing the Kaveri engine for over 35 years, is premature and unrealistic.
remember that nine prototypes of the Kaveri engine have been developed, and its dry variant is slated to power the Ghatak UCAV.
 
OK .. I watched the video .. So you produce parts for RR engines.. Which is not insignificant .. However I did not see a single moving hot engine section part in the entire video ..
All this is with you are a NATO member and with proximity to europe.
So as per my viewing TEI does the same work that TASL does here .
And indeed all you do is do MRO for the f110 there is not a single source to suggest that you manufacture the f110.
You claim that you are ahead of us which is laughable. Our engine has flown on foreign test beds and has achieved its performance benchmarks. The kaveri has had problems that again had to be tested in foreign test facilities and have its problems fixed. All this was done painstakingly over many years through sanctions after 1998 nuclear tests and other restrictions.
And all you have are renders and a timeline. Nobody here is impressed by your boasts.
Go search Tei in detail first ! Than you may see the huge difference with your companies.
Except turbine blades, Tei produced almost every part of the engines as supplier to OEMs.
Since 2017, it has single crystal turbine blade technology as well. It produces turbine blades of its own projects. It did just apply repairs on turbine blades of Foreign OEM engines but now it has capability to produce its own turbine blades.
 
Go search Tei in detail first ! Than you may see the huge difference with your companies.
Except turbine blades, Tei produced almost every part of the engines as supplier to OEMs.
Since 2017, it has single crystal turbine blade technology as well. It produces turbine blades of its own projects. It did just apply repairs on turbine blades of Foreign OEM engines but now it has capability to produce its own turbine blades.
Mark my words: the Indian Ghatak UCAV will be flying with the Kaveri engine within the next 1–2 years, while the Turkish engine is will remain on paper during that time.
 
Turkey does not have an indigenous turbofan engine, and it will take at least 30 years to develop a functional one. Whether it will meet the required standards remains to be seen. Comparing Turkey’s engine program with India’s, which has been developing the Kaveri engine for over 35 years, is premature and unrealistic.
remember that nine prototypes of the Kaveri engine have been developed, and its dry variant is slated to power the Ghatak UCAV.
Within 2 years, we will see tf6000 on anka3!
We will see first run of tf10000 within a year and first run of tf35000 within 2 years!!
We can not compare tei to long taking indian projects!!
You made Kaveri,why you are not using? What is cycle and hours for each shop visit?
You are not using since not just thrust but shop visit cycles also so low!
 
Nah give the TB-2 some slack. It's a moped, and for a moped it does what it was designed to do, no more, no less. It's an honest product. Problem here is how it was being hyped up during the early years of Ukraine-Russia war. And the nafo circles lapped it up and portrayed it as some advanced Predator tier drone. It's an insurgent/squatter swatter. And it does the job for cheap.
Imagine simping for a turk.

Songar useless. yiha useless.

Bayraktar good for "squatter swatter" whatever the fuck that means
 
Mark my words: the Indian Ghatak UCAV will be flying with the Kaveri engine within the next 1–2 years, while the Turkish engine is will remain on paper during that time.
On paper? It already made more than 100 runs in less than 15 months!! It creates more thrust than Ukrainian engine taht is used on Kızılelma as of now!!
 
Within 2 years, we will see tf6000 on anka3!
We will see first run of tf10000 within a year and first run of tf35000 within 2 years!!
We can not compare tei to long taking indian projects!!
You made Kaveri,why you are not using? What is cycle and hours for each shop visit?
You are not using since not just thrust but shop visit cycles also so low!
In the next 1–2 years, when the Ghatak UCAV begins flying with the Kaveri engine and the Turkish engine will exists only on paper, we’ll revisit this discussion. Turkey is a small country and, on its own, cannot match India in developing such state-of-the-art technologies. As a NATO member, it can receive support, but independently, it will always lack the capability to compete at the same level.
 
Imagine simping for a turk.

Songar useless. yiha useless.

Bayraktar good for "squatter swatter" whatever the fuck that means
I haven’t seen any country successfully replace manned fighter jets with drones so far. While unmanned fighter jets may eventually replace manned ones in the future, it has yet to be demonstrated that they can truly match the capabilities of their manned counterparts.
 
Go search Tei in detail first ! Than you may see the huge difference with your companies.
I did . The only credible part of the company are the outsourced parts from RR / airbus etc no different from TASL .. hmm perhaps TASL should sponsor a youtuber.
Except turbine blades, Tei produced almost every part of the engines as supplier to OEMs.
So does TASL and so does HAL but then again that is not the bottleneck of engine development.
Since 2017, it has single crystal turbine blade technology as well. It produces turbine blades of its own projects. It did just apply repairs on turbine blades of Foreign OEM engines but now it has capability to produce its own turbine blades.
And so has our DMRL and Midhani along with the ability to increase the service life of russian engines.

Again the kaveri exits and has flown on a FTB, your engine live in renders.,..

You can ask HAL or Godrej for an engine for your kaan after the americans sanction you again.
 
Last edited:
It’s a small drone
Not so small with 1600kg take off weight and 280+ kg payload.
It will use 4-6 Kemankeş 1 cruise missile with more than 200 km range




View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pt9MZd37H9M&pp=ygUJS2VtYW5rZXMx
 
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top