Türkiye: News, Discussions & Updates.

Mail-SPL-468-X60-2x
Turkey does not have an indigenous turbofan engine, and it will take at least 30 years to develop a functional one. Whether it will meet the required standards remains to be seen. Comparing Turkey’s engine program with India’s, which has been developing the Kaveri engine for over 35 years, is premature and unrealistic.
remember that nine prototypes of the Kaveri engine have been developed, and its dry variant is slated to power the Ghatak UCAV.
Is it your thinking that because India took 35+ years to reach where it has with Kaveri, Turkiye must take a similar amount of time?

What about the investment levels in the two engines? What about the quality of project management of the Indian and Turkish programmes? What about administrative delays in the two countries? And the cultures within the organisations doing the engine design and development?
 
Is it your thinking that because India took 35+ years to reach where it has with Kaveri, Turkiye must take a similar amount of time?

What about the investment levels in the two engines? What about the quality of project management of the Indian and Turkish programmes? What about administrative delays in the two countries? And the cultures within the organisations doing the engine design and development?
India even has no capability to start it's amca engine project on its own! They are looking for partners. And they think they are way ahead of Türkiye!
 
Is it your thinking that because India took 35+ years to reach where it has with Kaveri, Turkiye must take a similar amount of time?

What about the investment levels in the two engines? What about the quality of project management of the Indian and Turkish programmes? What about administrative delays in the two countries? And the cultures within the organisations doing the engine design and development?
Every country that has developed a turbofan engine has taken 30 to 40 years to do so. Even France, with an already established turbofan engine program, took 15 years to develop the M88 engine and 23 years to fully operationalize the Rafale fighter jets.

The reason India can develop a 110 kN engine for the AMCA within the next 10–15 years because it has already developed the Kaveri engine. The most challenging part of engine development is establishing the necessary ecosystem—know-how, research institutions, and skilled manpower—which India has already accomplished. The same cannot be said for Turkey.
 
Every country that has developed a turbofan engine has taken 30 to 40 years to do so. Even France, with an already established turbofan engine program, took 15 years to develop the M88 engine and 23 years to fully operationalize the Rafale fighter jets.

The reason India can develop a 110 kN engine for the AMCA within the next 10–15 years because it has already developed the Kaveri engine. The most challenging part of engine development is establishing the necessary ecosystem—know-how, research institutions, and skilled manpower—which India has already accomplished. The same cannot be said for Turkey.
Türkiye has all the infrastructure for the engine.
Do not talk with your little knowledge about Türkiye
 
India even has no capability to start it's amca engine project on its own! They are looking for partners. And they think they are way ahead of Türkiye!
France alone cannot develop a capable fifth-generation fighter jet. They need India for collaboration and funding, France will not be able to finance the entire project independently.
 
Türkiye has all the infrastructure for the engine.
Do not talk with your little knowledge about Türkiye
India has established dedicated research institutes to train skilled manpower for engine manufacturing. This same workforce will contribute to the development of the upcoming 110 kN engine. Such complex projects take decades, testing and certification of an engine alone requires 10–15 years.
 
India has established dedicated research institutes to train skilled manpower for engine manufacturing. This same workforce will contribute to the development of the upcoming 110 kN engine. Such complex projects take decades, testing and certification of an engine alone requires 10–15 years.
That work force is already retired!! Get real!
Go watch what indian authorities say about indian engine, watch what drdo engineers say about indian engine!! They even say they miss all necessary infrastructure!!They look for partner ,but this guy claims indians have all the things !!
Get real man!
 
France alone cannot develop a capable fifth-generation fighter jet. They need India for collaboration and funding, France will not be able to finance the entire project independently.
I don't believe that France needs Indian collaboration. What are the areas in which Indian technology is ahead of French technology whereby France requires Indian technology input?

PS I have no technical knowledge of TF engines but I have the impression that the level of technology developed in the US, France and the UK is several decades in advance of what exists in India or Turkiye.
 
Last edited:
That work force is already retired!! Get real!
Go watch what indian authorities say about indian engine, watch what drdo engineers say about indian engine!! They even say they miss all necessary infrastructure!!They look for partner ,but this guy claims indians have all the things !!
Get real man!
That workforce is retired but the research institute is established to train manpower, it continuously produces skilled professionals, and the quality of that manpower keeps improving over time. building such an institute itself takes decades.

BrahMos Aerospace in India, which manufactures the BrahMos missile, is not just a factory—it represents a comprehensive ecosystem for research and development, built and refined over decades.
 
I don't believe that France needs Indian collaboration. What are the areas in which Indian technology is ahead of French technology whereby France requires Indian technology input?

PS I have no technical knowledge of TF engines but I have the impression that the level of technology developed in the US, France and the UK is several decades in advance of what exists in India or Turkiye.
They need funds
 
That workforce is retired but the research institute is established to train manpower, it continuously produces skilled professionals, and the quality of that manpower keeps improving over time. building such an institute itself takes decades.

BrahMos Aerospace in India, which manufactures the BrahMos missile, is not just a factory—it represents a comprehensive ecosystem for research and development, built and refined over decades.
Almost for 10 years,Kaveri project funding stopped so no new engineers!!
 
Almost for 10 years,Kaveri project funding stopped so no new engineers!!
Funding for the Kaveri engine project may have been stopped, but research and development efforts have continued. While the Indian government can halt funding for a specific project, it is neither possible nor practical to stop funding research and development as a whole. For instance, funding for the HF-24 Marut was discontinued, but that did not mean funding was withdrawn from institutions such as the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), Gas Turbine Research Establishment (GTRE), Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), or the numerous other organizations involved in aircraft development.

If the U.S. were to stop supplying engines for the Tejas fighter jet today, funding for the acquisition of additional Tejas platforms might be halted. However, the broader ecosystem that has been developed around the jet will continue to function. The same infrastructure, expertise, and institutions would shift focus to developing a new fighter jet program, with a different engine source.
 
Almost for 10 years,Kaveri project funding stopped so no new engineers!!
Yo Mehmet ! Go to the Wiki page on GTRE & get educated on what that organization stands for its aims & the projects it handles. Kaveri is but one of them.

Secondly you're a Turkish bot here to spread disinformation & propaganda about Turkish copy paste products not evaluate Indian programs.

Word of advice - Stick to your brief lest you be booted out of the forum into the Bosphorus permanently. Consider yourself warned.
 
Yo Mehmet ! Go to the Wiki page on GTRE & get educated on what that organization stands for its aims & the projects it handles. Kaveri is but one of them.

Secondly you're a Turkish bot here to spread disinformation & propaganda about Turkish copy paste products not evaluate Indian programs.

Word of advice - Stick to your brief lest you be booted out of the forum into the Bosphorus permanently. Consider yourself warned.
Does not matter, as long as funding goes, you may just keep few management level people in those institutes. Since that institutes also do not make money by serially producing any product. So keeping that institutes as functioning without funding is almost impossible. Hence engineers leave institutes if there is no fund! Your drdo guys were saying same things, even they are not able to find engineers to work there
 
They need funds
All projects need funds.

Yes, France has not produced a 5G aircraft. Like the UK it chose to develop a 6G aircraft, skipping 5G. As far as I know (no special knowledge), France is still intent on developing a 6G aircraft, within FCAS or conceivably with a change of partner.

France seems to want project leadership of airframe and engine in JV's. If there were some France/India JV, make no mistake - India would be the very junior partner in the project, possibly doing the 'easy stuff' while paying Dassault to do the 'difficult stuff' and the R&D for the 'new stuff'.

I imagine that 6G is way beyond the reach of the Indian aviation industry. Is India in the market for 6G, anyway? I would think India would be more interested in getting 5G AMCA developed and into production.
 
All projects need funds.

Yes, France has not produced a 5G aircraft. Like the UK it chose to develop a 6G aircraft, skipping 5G. As far as I know (no special knowledge), France is still intent on developing a 6G aircraft, within FCAS or conceivably with a change of partner.

France seems to want project leadership of airframe and engine in JV's. If there were some France/India JV, make no mistake - India would be the very junior partner in the project, possibly doing the 'easy stuff' while paying Dassault to do the 'difficult stuff' and the R&D for the 'new stuff'.

I imagine that 6G is way beyond the reach of the Indian aviation industry. Is India in the market for 6G, anyway? I would think India would be more interested in getting 5G AMCA developed and into production.
India needs France primarily for engine development; everything else can be managed domestically.
 
Does not matter, as long as funding goes, you may just keep few management level people in those institutes. Since that institutes also do not make money by serially producing any product. So keeping that institutes as functioning without funding is almost impossible. Hence engineers leave institutes if there is no fund! Your drdo guys were saying same things, even they are not able to find engineers to work there
No research institute in India generates profit, yet the country spends over 17 billion dollars annually on these institutes. This funding continues to increase as more research institutes—both in the public and private sectors, as well as through public-private partnerships—emerge every year.
 
There has to be a way to fund the Romanians through back channels to start impaling these cocksuckers again

Why is there such an active turkeyposter on dfb

I know the wumaos get paid. Does the turk get paid too or this just his dirty turkish hobby
 
India needs France primarily for engine development; everything else can be managed domestically.
Where engine development is concerned, AMCA is where it was 10 years ago. 10 years of talking with no result. IMO there is no reason to suspect that there will ever be a result.
 
VPN-HSL-468-X60-2x

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top