The nose/front fuselage design has been changedSome 3D-CG by various artists on TEDBF:
View attachment 1441
View attachment 1442
View attachment 1446
View attachment 1447
View attachment 1443
View attachment 1444
View attachment 1445
These renders look dope hopefully we operate these before i dieSome 3D-CG by various artists on TEDBF:
View attachment 1441
View attachment 1442
View attachment 1446
View attachment 1447
View attachment 1443
View attachment 1444
View attachment 1445
Any news on project stage,you know PDR,CDR...Slides by ADA (Aeronautical Defence Agency)
View attachment 1438
View attachment 1439
View attachment 1440
The nose/front fuselage design has been changed
For increased volume. Do we have images of those designs ?
These renders look dope hopefully we operate these before i die
Then expect first flight in 2030s onlyPDR was expected later this year
Navy would be wanting it when the third carrier comes online ie 2034-35 timeline so it makes senseThen expect first flight in 2030s only
PPT says first flight by 2026, man I'd be happy if first flight is in 2030Slides by ADA (Aeronautical Defence Agency)
View attachment 1438
View attachment 1439
View attachment 1440
Covid f(ked a lot of timelines too thats 2 years of total shutdown and 2 years of slow restartPPT says first flight by 2026, man I'd be happy if first flight is in 2030
If it didn't fly by 2026 then we all will gather in front of ADA office.PPT says first flight by 2026, man I'd be happy if first flight is in 2030
I believe cdr by 2026,27 will happen.If it didn't fly by 2026 then we all will gather in front of ADA office.
I was so surprised that AMCA and TEDBF were not a single bird from the beginning.
It said that it will mostly share components with AMCA, I don't think it implies in anyway that design will be changed. Just that it will have common components.How will a possible merger look like at this point? Isn't the preliminary design of AMCA already done? If so no major changes can be made to it's design. If TEDBF indeed evolves into N-AMCA, that would make the 2nd Vikrant class AC obsolete and we will leapfrog to nuclear powered 65K tonnes AC by 2040s. If that's the case, 26 Rafale-M sounds too low in to compensate for the old mig-29k airframes.
But wasn't that already known? Tejas MK2 AMCA TEDBF/ORCA are going to share a lot of tech and engines? So what's new here?It said that it will mostly share components with AMCA, I don't think it implies in anyway that design will be changed. Just that it will have common components.