Vinaash kaale vipreet buddhi
They desperately want to show they are still a major world power and that they have a sayVinaash kaale vipreet buddhi
They simply do not have the manpower or the budget for it. And they would be sitting ducks for Russian attacks and Russia would nothing to lose by going after resupply nodes in Poland and such.Vinaash kaale vipreet buddhi
This is sickening! @recusant_raja reveals NAMES in the Labour Party who were hiding the grooming gangs in order to secure VOTES from imams in the communities.
Full video here on X.
Reply with what most shocked you - and spread it far and wide, because the people named here absolutely won't like that.
Timestamps:
0:00 Raja Miah Highlights
1:30 Raja Miah’s Incredible Work
4:30 Failure of DBS Checks & Mosques Led By Offenders
7:00 Postal Votes & Labour’s Involvement
8:30 Islamic Cartels Collecting Postal Votes
10:30 Islamification of the UK 14:30 The Grooming Gangs
17:30 Labour: ‘Daddy’ is one of Ours
20:30 Oldham’s Shisha Bar Grooming Gangs
22:50 Labour Threatened to Sue Raja
25:30 Magistrate Asking Raja For Help
27:30 The Labour Leader Who Laughed at Raja
30:00 Bare…Faced…Lies!
32:30 The Police Missed 9 Times!
34:00 What About White Gangs
36:00 Mayor Andy Burnham Shoulda Known Better
38:10 What Maggie Oliver Had to Do!
40:30 Operation Hexagon!
45:10 How We Fight the Cover-Up
46:30 Dangerous People After Raja
49:00 Should We Have Compulsory Voting
53:00 Does Raja Feel Any Hope?
55:10 Mothin Ali & The Palestine Flags
57:30 Labour Making Muslims Feel Fear 1:00:30 A Heretic Raja Admires:
This is a perfect example of the tried and tested tactic of Britain trying to play the vulnerable innocent in the unfolding Euro-Atlantic drama. What is happening now, the degrading of the European mainland into a chaotic security vacuum, is exactly the result that Britain wishes, in fact.
It is the natural consequence of its "Brexit strategy" which started with the call for a referendum in 2013 by David Cameron (what specifically prompted him to call for one?). Britain began the campaign to extract itself from the EU at about the same time that the Ukraine "battering ram" campaign against Russia started in earnest with the Maidan coup.
By 2016, both were well in play, and Brexit happened. Now, back to its pre-war status as a lone ranger on the European side of the Atlantic, Britain was free to play its age old game of empires. That was the strategic bet its establishment made.
And the goal was clear, to get ensure that Russia and Germany never get cosy and integrated - because that would mean a strong, stable Eurasian landmass in which Britain had no real leadership position. That was unacceptable, so no Nordstream, no peace between the two strong continental European powers.
The Americans were subtly, and almost certainly the result of a clear strategem, led into this conflict - not that there was a fundamental disagreement on weakening Russia. I don't think they signed on for chaos in Europe though.
The only spanner in the works was Trump, in 2016. Enter Christopher Steele, "former" MI6, and Russiagate, etc. One day, this story will be fleshed out by people with better access to information.
The problem is that the strategic gambit has failed, or to put it differently, the victory is a pyrhhic one at best. Instead of a long-term division on the Eurasian mainland, you may well see a totally opposite outcome although it does not look that way at the moment at all.
I suspect those parts of the British establishment which run these things have begun to realise this. Hence the vulnerable innocence play. What you will see in action however, is effort to get closer to "our European partners", more effort to bring Turkey into the discussion on future solutions, and quiet outreach to China.