US: News & Discussions

[Cheepek]

What explosives was he carrying in his truck?


View: https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1875005944360214807?t=LwqkcdfBKYuTPjiWfmaM6w&s=19

 

[Cheepek]

Order Regarding the Proposed Acquisition of United States Steel Corporation by Nippon Steel Corporation | The White House

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 721 of the Defense

www.whitehouse.gov

 

[Cheepek]

Do you think US will be ready to throw body bags for a country it has blocked from acquiring a company, citing threat to national security?

 

[LETHALFORCE]

All these racist sentiment dosen't mean shit. Most Americans are too stupid to reboot a computer.
Without Indians US tech industry ceases to exist. Ignore the idiotic morons.

 

[Hari Sud]

Strategic Decoupling from China for U.S.

Decoupling from China presents an opportunity to reduce its dominance over global supply chains. For years, China has leveraged this control to its advantage, often at the expense of other nations. However, with leaders like Trump challenging China’s influence, such Chinese strategies are less likely to succeed.

To secure its future, the U.S.—as a major consumption hub—must develop independent and diversified supply chains. Americans are less concerned about who produces their dishwashers or clothing and more focused on securing critical supplies like semiconductors, consumer electronics, pharmaceuticals and many others away from China.

Countries like Vietnam, Mexico, and India are emerging as viable alternatives, attracting investments as manufacturers shift away from China. Official policy for this transition, while gradual, is evident in the declining foreign direct investment (FDI) in China and its rise in nations like India and Vietnam.

The incoming President Trump’s proposed tariffs on Chinese imports could play a significant role in reducing China’s manufacturing monopoly and redistributing it to other countries. While this reorientation of global manufacturing is time-consuming, with sufficient foreign direct investment (FDI), it is achievable within three to five years.

Another tool at the U.S.’s disposal is addressing the U.S.-Yuan exchange rate, which was set decades ago to make Chinese exports cheaper in the U.S. market. This outdated arrangement needs to be re-evaluated to reflect current economic realities.

Additionally, the U.S. Dollar remains a powerful economic weapon, as 90% of global trade is conducted in dollars. The U.S. can restrict its usage for trade by any nation, as demonstrated during the Ukraine war, when Russia’s access to the dollar and the SWIFT system was curtailed. Although Russia has managed to adapt, such measures significantly complicate trade operations.

If China resists efforts to diversify supply chains or address the exchange rate imbalance, the U.S. can leverage its weaponized dollar to reinforce its position.

Disruption it will cause:

The disruption caused by U.S. trade actions is often overstated in the media. While Wall Street and importers from China may resist changing the 25-year-old status quo, they are not responsible for managing foreign policy. The reality is that the U.S. transfers a staggering $500 billion annually to China, providing it with significant economic leverage and the means to undermine U.S. interests both now and in the future. Even relocating half of these imports away from China would send a strong signal to China’s aggressive foreign policy architects.

While the success of Trump’s trade policies remains uncertain, it is evident that some manufacturing will return to the U.S., while other production will shift to politically stable, low-wage countries with skilled workforces. If this transition occurs, it would represent a significant shift in U.S. trade patterns and could enhance American economic prosperity.

 

[Azaad]

View: https://twitter.com/nick_clevelands/status/1875215367334973672?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/nick_clevelands/status/1875215385831875037?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/nick_clevelands/status/1875215407721886088?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/nick_clevelands/status/1875215427846205747?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/nick_clevelands/status/1875215441993613402?s=19

THREAD !!

Interesting , very interesting indeed.

 

[Blademaster]

View: https://twitter.com/nick_clevelands/status/1875215367334973672?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/nick_clevelands/status/1875215385831875037?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/nick_clevelands/status/1875215407721886088?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/nick_clevelands/status/1875215427846205747?s=19


View: https://twitter.com/nick_clevelands/status/1875215441993613402?s=19

THREAD !!

Interesting , very interesting indeed.

And how does he expect these experts to make a living? Work for free and live off the generosity of their families or on welfare benefits?

 

[Miss Firing]

Lunderica has awarded a man who among other things worked very actively against India & it's government.



This award drama by the american regime that has been voted out decisively is seen as a circle jerk.

 

[Cheepek]

Fascist mudi should learn


View: https://x.com/MeidasTouch/status/1876654095370420486?t=ZuB5Ou4gcnI_3fS6DO2D0w&s=19

 

[shade2]

And how does he expect these experts to make a living? Work for free and live off the generosity of their families or on welfare benefits?

I guess his point is that all Exfarts everywhere unless from a proper discipline like engineering, medical or scientific i.e these think-tankists are *someone's* paid shills as compared to the image that us proles are shown with the title of "expert".

There is a pipeline which uses these Academic "experts" and their papers as citations to push for foreign and domestic policy decisions.

So you need to lobby politicians + fund these "experts" to push the things you want in the US foreign/domestic policy circles..

It's why Qatar and UAE are top donors but it's surprising that Saudiya is missing and of course China.

 

[The Juggernaut]