US Economy : News & Discussions.



View: https://youtu.be/lxW2H8oMhd4?si=SmyUeSE6HHRsxkhw

EU is twice screwed beginning with the US & their outpost in Europe - the UK engineering the crisis in Ukraine waiting for Russia to take the bait & in turn screw themselves & the entire continent economically & now Trump is making up for any loopholes Biden may have overlooked .

Then there's China running roughshod in EU on EU companies apart from wiping their own domestic market in China with these EU cos.

Splendid time to possess the Schengen Visa.

Alhamdulillah !
 


View: https://youtu.be/lxW2H8oMhd4?si=SmyUeSE6HHRsxkhw

EU is twice screwed beginning with the US & their outpost in Europe - the UK engineering the crisis in Ukraine waiting for Russia to take the bait & in turn screw themselves & the entire continent economically & now Trump is making up for any loopholes Biden may have overlooked .

Then there's China running roughshod in EU on EU companies apart from wiping their own domestic market in China with these EU cos.

Splendid time to possess the Schengen Visa.

Alhamdulillah !

Ola Uber - We is winning!

fatal-fatalskeptic.gif
 
Trade and Trump Turmoil

Whatever else President Trump has done—setting aside his domestic immigration and efficiency concerns—he has undeniably upended international trade. On April 2nd; a 10% tariff on all imported goods and a higher import taxes on 60 countries has definitely changed the rules of current trade practices. While his policies may ultimately benefit America, they are likely to disrupt the rest of the world. Long-standing trade agreements will undergo dramatic changes. Gone are the days when countries, particularly China, could freely flood the U.S. market with their products. Moving forward, exporters will need to consider what they can import from America in return. In essence, trade will have to be balanced—or it won’t happen at all.

The newly imposed tariffs and counter-tariffs are likely to become the norm. The era of cheap, disposable “Made in China” goods—products that encouraged a culture of buy, use, and discard—will fade. Instead, markets will shift toward quality and durability, albeit at a higher price. One of the hardest-hit industries will be the automobile sector and its foreign supply chains. Imported vehicles and components will face heavy taxation, incentivizing domestic production.

Countries like China, where cheap exports are the backbone of the economy, will face a dilemma. Excess manufacturing capacity beyond domestic consumption will be left idle unless new markets are found. However, other countries, inspired by Trump’s policies, will also push for balanced trade. Those who have overbuilt their industrial capacity will bear the consequences.

A prime example is China’s trade relationship with India. India, lacking a strong electronics manufacturing base, imports $120 billion worth of goods from China while exporting a mere $17 billion in return—creating a massive trade imbalance in China’s favour. Until now, India had little choice due to its dependence on Chinese electronics. But with Trump’s trade policies reshaping global commerce, India may demand a more balanced relationship or require China to manufacture within its borders. This mirrors the shift Trump is advocating on a global scale.

What the media often calls “Trump’s trade turmoil” is, in reality, a push for trade equilibrium. Countries will be forced to negotiate Free Trade Agreements to ensure reciprocity. While there may be short-term disruptions, the long-term outlook suggests a more balanced and sustainable global trade system.
 
Hope this hurts Bangladesh more than India.

Even worse for Kanglus is if India gets free trade agreements and MFN status passed in the EU and UK this year.


View: https://x.com/RajaMuneeb/status/1907555492844462463

India @ 26%.
China & 34%.
Vietnam & 46%.



View: https://twitter.com/DerrickEvans4WV/status/1907478383778230776?s=19

1 down, 190+ countries to go...
 

India exports total $750 billion worth of goods in a year. The U.S. exports are about $110 billion with a trade deficit of about $30 billion. Hence if U.S. dumps tariffs on India then it will have small impact on India but examine that India does not permit additional US goods entry into India then it is a bigger US losses.

Retaliatory steps truthfully teach other party a good lesson.
 

India exports total $750 billion worth of goods in a year. The U.S. exports are about $110 billion with a trade deficit of about $30 billion. Hence if U.S. dumps tariffs on India then it will have small impact on India but examine that India does not permit additional US goods entry into India then it is a bigger US losses.

Retaliatory steps truthfully teach other party a good lesson.

Please have a little search before posting these figures, neither India exports these many goods a year not our goods export to US is 110 billion
 
Please have a little search before posting these figures, neither India exports these many goods a year not our goods export to US is 110 billion
Already done…. This are figures not from Google but straight from data.
 
Crazy stuff by Dolund bhai. 🤣 It will be interesting to see how his white nationalist fanbase will react when their lord the saviour's tariff war hits them like a freight train, and everything becomes expensive overnight.
 
Already done…. This are figures not from Google but straight from data.

Indian total Goods exports are 437 Billion USD for FY2024

Indian Goods export to us 77 Billion USD for FY2024 (on which these tariffs are applicable) likely reduction to US goods export will be close to 10-20 billion dollars

This is the correct data

Service exports no tariff is applicable
 
Orange freak does not care tho. As others have pointed out, he is targetting trade surpluses, not tariffs. And vietnam reroutes chong exports - that is an even bigger challenge.

They want preferable market access to even out surplus but do Vietnam even has that kind of market to observe 100 billion worth of US goods, India can
 
Tariffs as a Negotiating Tool

Since World War II, the United States has been a major global consumption hub. Every country wants access to its massive consumer market, which is why more than hundred nations export goods to America. However, President Clinton’s policies led to the outsourcing of manufacturing, making the U.S. increasingly dependent on imports.

To reverse this trend, the Trump administration turned to tariffs as a key strategy. Tariffs provide the U.S. with significant leverage over exporting nations and companies. If foreign businesses want to sell their products in America, they must either establish manufacturing operations within the country or face heavy import taxes. The downside, however, is that American goods also face tariff barriers abroad, making already expensive U.S.-made products even costlier. Trump’s goal is to negotiate the removal of these barriers—if not, import tariffs on foreign goods will remain.

This approach should be seen as a long-term strategy, as rebuilding domestic manufacturing takes time. Factories must be constructed, operations must be established, and supply chains must be developed. Only then can surplus production be exported. This is not a process that unfolds in a year or even within a single presidential term.

Ultimately, advanced economies like the U.S., Europe, and Japan may lower tariffs among themselves, resuming normal trade relations. However, this outcome is only achievable through the pressure tariffs create.

For smaller and developing nations, the situation is more complicated. American exports come with a high labor cost—ranging from $45 to $65 per hour. Since manufacturing accounts for roughly 40% of a product’s cost, these smaller nations struggle to afford U.S. goods unless prices are significantly reduced. If American companies cannot compete with local production costs in these countries, their products simply won’t sell—posing a major challenge to Trump’s trade policy. This issue remains unresolved and will require further negotiation to balance production costs.

In short, this is just the beginning. There is still a long road ahead in reshaping global trade dynamics.

Cheers, President Trump.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top