Indian Air Force: News & Discussions (18 Viewers)

Forget Superjet. Its terrible in-service record due to terrible manufacturer support bankrupted Interjet.


I short, Superjet confirmed that western airlines could not risk using Russia airliners.
THE SUKHOI SUPERJET 100 FACES AN UNCERTAIN OUTLOOK DUE TO SANCTIONS AND OPERATIONAL FAILURES
A21 Editorial Staff A21 Editorial Staff December 17, 2024


The Sukhoi Superjet 100 faces an uncertain outlook due to sanctions and operational failures
Although the Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SSJ-100) is a relatively new aircraft model to the market, a total of 95 incidents involving this aircraft have been recorded since April 2011, including five that resulted in the total loss of the hull. Of these, three accidents resulted in 89 fatalities.

These figures have raised questions about its safety, despite the fact that it is considered as reliable as any other commercial aircraft, according to international standards. However, the sanctions imposed on Russian companies could change this perception in the coming years.

Since its first flight in May 2008 and its official entry into service in 2011, approximately 229 SSJ-100s have been manufactured. Designed to carry between 87 and 108 passengers, it has a cruise speed of Mach 0.78-0.81 and a maximum range of 4,578 kilometers. Despite its promising specifications, its geographic distribution and airline adoption are limited, both within and outside Russia.

Interjet, a Mexican airline, was one of the first to incorporate the SSJ-100 into its fleet (2013). However, reliability issues with the model and a slow supply of spare parts forced the airline to ground several units. By 2019, 15 of its 22 aircraft were grounded, and the company planned to replace them with Airbus A320neo models. Interjet's financial situation worsened, leading to its bankruptcy filing in April 2021.

In Europe, CityJet also adopted the SSJ-100, adding seven units between 2016 and 2018. These aircraft, which operated temporarily for Brussels Airlines, also faced reliability issues. By 2020, CityJet retired all aircraft of this model. Currently, only four SSJ-100s are operated by entities outside of Russia: three by the Royal Thai Air Force and one by the National Security Committee of Kazakhstan.

Of the five accidents that resulted in total hull loss, three were attributed to human error.

In May 2012, a demonstration flight in Indonesia ended tragically when the pilot ignored the terrain warning system alarms and the aircraft crashed into Mount Salak, killing 45 people.

In October 2015, an Interjet SSJ-100 collided with a passenger jetway at Mexico City International Airport while being towed, causing no injuries.

In October 2018, an incident in Yakutsk, Russia, resulted in severe damage to the landing gear due to icy conditions, although there were no fatalities.

The deadliest accident occurred in May 2019 at Sheremetyevo Airport, Moscow. After being struck by lightning, an Aeroflot SSJ-100 returned for an emergency landing. The maneuver was too abrupt, causing a fire that quickly spread through the aircraft. This incident left 41 dead out of a total of 78 passengers on board.

In July 2024, an accident during a test flight conducted by Gazpromavia resulted in the deaths of three crew members. Preliminary investigations suggest errors in the installation of angle-of-attack sensors.

Thus, the Sukhoi Superjet has been under scrutiny since its launch, like other new models. Although design improvements have been made to mitigate failures, international sanctions imposed on Russia since 2022 have complicated maintenance of these aircraft.

Aviation Week reported in 2023 that only 20% of imported SSJ parts could be repaired by Russian suppliers, increasing the number of aircraft parked or stored.

The United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), Sukhoi's parent company, began development of the SJ-100, a fully "Russified" version of the Superjet.

This model made its first flight in 2023. However, airlines operating SSJ-100s with Western components continue to face difficulties keeping them operational, which could increase incident reports in the future.

According to the Aviation Safety Network database, most of the 95 reported incidents involving the SSJ-100 were minor and did not result in serious injuries or casualties. Although fatal accidents have been primarily attributed to human error, the increase in incidents since 2022 underscores the challenges these aircraft face in the current environment.

Finally, the Sukhoi Superjet 100 meets the same safety standards as other commercial aircraft. However, its future is conditioned by international restrictions.


Mexican report
 
> AL-41 for Sukhoi Upgrade program. Russia offered it four months ago.
> HAL-Rosoboronexport to sign work share contract.
> 78% indigenous content.
> AESA radar, Glass cockpit, Avionics, Mission computers.
> Talks with Russia on new Air to Air missiles.
 
> AL-41 for Sukhoi Upgrade program. Russia offered it four months ago.
> HAL-Rosoboronexport to sign work share contract.
> 78% indigenous content.
> AESA radar, Glass cockpit, Avionics, Mission computers.
> Talks with Russia on new Air to Air missiles.
They are offering local assembly of AL-41? Honestly if so we should ask them for AL-51 too. We can always indigenise the components.
 
I don't understand why the government never bother giving a small tender to private companies for stuff like trainer jets, rescue helicopter, small order combat helis, etc. If such projects had been given to private players they would have developed skills and infrastructure for even building something similar to Tejas by now.
 
Last edited:
> AL-41 for Sukhoi Upgrade program. Russia offered it four months ago.
> HAL-Rosoboronexport to sign work share contract.
> 78% indigenous content.
> AESA radar, Glass cockpit, Avionics, Mission computers.
> Talks with Russia on new Air to Air missiles.

They are offering local assembly of AL-41? Honestly if so we should ask them for AL-51 too. We can always indigenise the components.

Guys, can we use the Byelka( su57 ) or Zhuk AESA( mig35 ) radars on our MKIs?
Just as a fallback assuming Uttam for MKI is delayed?

Any other aesa radars we can buy from 5 places and integrate?

imo main things are
>2-3 sqdrns Rafale purchase
>Get super sukhoi upgrade done quickly
>Get AMCA in service quickly.


mk2 mwf ka dekha jayega i have no hopes
 
Guys, can we use the Byelka( su57 ) or Zhuk AESA( mig35 ) radars on our MKIs?
Just as a fallback assuming Uttam for MKI is delayed?

Any other aesa radars we can buy from 5 places and integrate?

imo main things are
>2-3 sqdrns Rafale purchase
>Get super sukhoi upgrade done quickly
>Get AMCA in service quickly.


mk2 mwf ka dekha jayega i have no hopes
Uttam for MKI i.e Virupaksha radar won't get delayed tbh. So no need to worry on that front. For mk2 mwf we can always go with french engines, yea it will delay it by 1-2 years but hey that's better than nothing.
 
They are offering local assembly of AL-41? Honestly if so we should ask them for AL-51 too. We can always indigenise the components.
leave aside al51 for a sec coz 200% sure they wont give away their crown jewel, but if we could get al41 manufacturing with negotiations for more and more indigenous content, we could have integrated it on our super sukhoi then they would have become next level, we could also use al41 in future on larger single engine interation of mwf mk2

al41 tot would have given so much know how and know why, but babooz are retards, this was the right time, vodkaland is in dire need of money, just slap 500 million usd on their cheeks and get it
 
Uttam for MKI i.e Virupaksha radar won't get delayed tbh. So no need to worry on that front. For mk2 mwf we can always go with french engines, yea it will delay it by 1-2 years but hey that's better than nothing.
is there any french engine in f414 dimension and thrust class?
 
Uttam for MKI i.e Virupaksha radar won't get delayed tbh. So no need to worry on that front. For mk2 mwf we can always go with french engines, yea it will delay it by 1-2 years but hey that's better than nothing.

How so optimistic saar?

I've heard Uttam is ready for Tejas now so is it easy to upscale the same radar for MKI?
I don't know anything about radar so asking.
 
How so optimistic saar?

I've heard Uttam is ready for Tejas now so is it easy to upscale the same radar for MKI?
I don't know anything about radar so asking.
There is another company pitching their AESA radar for Super Sukhoi i.e. Data Patterns Hawk-I with 2700 T/R Modules.
1751027829682.webp
 
There is another company pitching their AESA radar for Super Sukhoi i.e. Data Patterns Hawk-I with 2700 T/R Modules.
View attachment 41284

How the heck Indian private company built a AESA radar on their own? What am I missing here? Is the Radar ready? I am wondering who are their backers. This is not something private Indian company will get into without sufficient guarantees that their product is given a chance to be used in armed forces.
 
How the heck Indian private company built a AESA radar on their own? What am I missing here? Is the Radar ready? I am wondering who are their backers. This is not something private Indian company will get into without sufficient guarantees that their product is given a chance to be used in armed forces.
Tech transfer from drdo.
 
actual missed opportunity was the designs and blue prints of antonov which couldnt come into production due to fund crunch, we could have gone xhina - iai lavi route to get its design and get iaf its mta and awacs and refuellers all from the same aircraft, hence better logistics, and when we build it on our own, we can export it too

missed opportunity 2 - forcing the vodka to allow more and more indigenous changes in su30 mki, so that we change those metal surface with composites atleast, xhina way again
But our leaders are filled with short-sighted-ness. They don't have vision which is required to cope up with our rogue neighbours and insiders.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top