Operation Sindoor & Aftermath (37 Viewers)

Last edited:
I'm also interested in how to intercept super sonic missiles if this was a brahmos.

As i've said Ching has ~2 such SSMs, one is YJ-12, they have another one also but name escapes me, they can supply it to Paapistan.

ALBM ka bhi idk, but then the Ukies intercept Ruskal Iskanders with Patriot missiles so maybe S400 can do the same ?
Baraks were specifically tested against supersonic targets during it's developmental trials.


View: https://youtu.be/SouLIB79V2g?feature=shared
 
I wish/hope DRDO includes a PIF-PAF system (lateral thrusters like Aster-30) in Kusha M2 & M3 for BMD role. It will increase it's probability of kill.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6_hQP2LvTg

We use divert thrusters in BMD and ASAT systems. Heck even our cannister launched missiles have them for trajectory correction system. So such system I think shall be envisaged for kusha too.

1753262439733.webp

 
Last edited:
We use divert thrusters in BMD and ASAT systems. Heck even our cann8ster launched missiles have them for trajectory system. So such system I think shall be envisaged for kusha too.

View attachment 44168

This one is liquid bipropellant DACS, ideal for PDV sized interceptors. But they are too big and heavy for Kusha type missiles. Aster's lateral thrusters or PAC-3 MSE's RCS are better options for it.
 
This one is liquid bipropellant DACS, ideal for PDV sized interceptors. But they are too big and heavy for Kusha type missiles. Aster's lateral thrusters or PAC-3 MSE's RCS are better options for it.
Even AAD has it. Kusha shall be belong to AAD family. if you saw sirsa interception video you would have seen thrusters use in real life were missile slows down and aligns with target to intercept incoming BM.

 
The size difference between Kusha KV (Akash NG derived) and AAD (similar class as S400 40N6E) is significant.
Have you seen old nag? Similar system for nag was developed. Though it was not directional thruster system , but can surely be developed into one?
 
View attachment 44171

seems aster30 lateral thruster is in the kill vehicle section not the booster

Kusha m1 is the kill vehicle for m2 and m3 per the mockups
Same KV but different boosters. Maybe BMD specific KV with RCS or lateral DACS can be developed.
1753264063989.webp
1753264350168.webp
 

Attachments

  • 1753264091312.webp
    1753264091312.webp
    41.4 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
Why would IAF even hit a scrapyard instead of a Hangar just a minute away? Whatever we sent towards Rafiqui got intercepted and it was visible in the videos as well. Surprising people here aren't discussing this.
View attachment 44167
There are videos of 2 different SAM explosions (possible interceptions) from Shorkot that night.

Based on Pak OSINT, there are debris pics/videos of 3 Indian missile [2x Brahmos (one each in Jacobabad & Shorkot), 1x Scalp-EG (Sargodha)], the Scalp was definitely a malfunction as missile body had no shrapnel, burn marks and was relatively intact compared to brahmos debris.

Pakistani source for Shorkot's brahmos debris pics

View: https://x.com/VigorousFalcon/status/1922580608670199952
 
There are videos of 2 different SAM explosions (possible interceptions) from Shorkot that night.

Based on Pak OSINT, there are debris pics/videos of 3 Indian missile [2x Brahmos (one each in Jacobabad & Shorkot), 1x Scalp-EG (Sargodha)], the Scalp was definitely a malfunction as missile body had no shrapnel, burn marks and was relatively intact compared to brahmos debris.

Pakistani source for Shorkot's brahmos debris pics

View: https://x.com/VigorousFalcon/status/1922580608670199952

Is it safe to assume that the Brahmos interceptions would have been a close range ones , when the missile slows down to lock on in the terminal flight phase ?
 
Is it safe to assume that the Brahmos interceptions would have been a close range ones , when the missile slows down to lock on in the terminal flight phase ?
Yes, Jacobabad was in particular a lucky one for them, it was a last second interception just on the outskirts of the base as Brahmos dove in towards the target (maybe same hangar that was hit). Could have been done by SPADA-2000.

Rafiqui one was a bit further away. Most likely by HQ-16 LOMADS unlikely to be HQ-9.


View: https://x.com/OsintTV/status/1933027770373923088

View: https://x.com/SouleFacts/status/1921158306665484778
 
Yes, Jacobabad was in particular a lucky one for them, it was a last second interception just on the outskirts of the base as Brahmos dove in towards the target (maybe same hangar that was hit). Could have been done by SPADA-2000.

Rafiqui one was a bit further away. Most likely by HQ-16 LOMADS unlikely to be HQ-9.


View: https://x.com/OsintTV/status/1933027770373923088

View: https://x.com/SouleFacts/status/1921158306665484778

SPADA has been used by Ukraine to counter the Russian hypersonics with some limited success from what info is available . So it definetly does work , not sure how effective . Such close range interventions are pure luck.

And the Brahmos was fired during day time ... odd, unless the aim was to send a message to the populace .
 
Is it safe to assume that the Brahmos interceptions would have been a close range ones , when the missile slows down to lock on in the terminal flight phase ?

No, the BrahMos missile does not slow down in its terminal phase or when it is about to hit its target. In fact, it maintains its high supersonic speed throughout its flight, right up to the point of impact.
The BrahMos is a two-stage cruise missile. The first stage, a solid propellant booster, accelerates the missile to supersonic speeds. After separation, the second stage, a liquid-fueled ramjet engine, takes over and sustains the missile at a cruising speed of approximately Mach 2.8 to Mach 3.
A key design feature of the BrahMos is its ability to maintain this high speed for the entirety of its flight path, including the final or terminal phase of the attack.
 
View attachment 44202
since sindoor this is the 3rd time security forces have foiled an attack.
One of most overlooked accomplishments of Modi era is , how effective our agencies have became. One of my relative used to be in class 10th back in 2009-2010, and there used to be a genuine fear of a bomb going off in a crowded place, many schools had to phase out buses, because parents were scared of having their kids on buses and stuff. The school I went to only restored bus service for students in 2016.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom