Russian Ukrainian War

[Akim]

So, Ukraine is still a victim ? Even after invading a sovereign nation Russia at Kursk region and butchering and kidnapping civilians from there?

Salute to those 'International Laws'.

I'll start with the second part of the question and follow the old pattern: What evidence is there, other than the words of the alcoholic Masha Zakharova?
Maybe someone will find a video with a translation, because I'm tired of answering trifles. The woman heard on TV that Ukrainian fascists drove them into a village club and burned it.

View: https://x.com/devkiibuhlo/status/1837072238895313227
Regarding the invasion: We decide ourselves where to counterattack. We were not the first to start.
Besides, if we allowed an invasion of the Sumy region, nothing would change except moral condemnation of Russia's actions. We allowed an invasion of the Kharkiv region and the town of Vovchansk no longer exists. Let them bomb their own territory.

 

[Soldier35]

Engineering units of the Russian army have begun to build fortifications in the forests and fields of the Kursk and Belgorod regions bordering Ukraine. Engineering units of the Sever group are engaged in the construction of fortifications; dugouts and caponiers are being created. As reported, military fortifications are not being created for defense, but for the development of an offensive by troops from them; they can also be used for temporary rest for servicemen.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sa6AYfNhsDg

 

[Soldier35]

Archival footage of a unique battle between two Russian BTR-82A 810 Brigade of the Russian Marine Corps, with nineteen armored vehicles, the 82nd separate airborne assault brigade of the Ukrainian army. The video was filmed in the Kursk region, the 82nd assault brigade on light armored vehicles, tried to enter the rear of the Russian army. Two BTR-82As worked from an ambush, fire was conducted from 30-mm automatic cannons 2A72, armor-piercing ammunition. The positions of the BTRs and the direction of fire are shown in the video, it is partially shortened, the damaged equipment is shown at the end of the video. The official report on the battle is as follows. The Ukrainian column was moving in a composition of nineteen armored vehicles, 12 armored vehicles were able to enter the area of the settlement. Eight armored vehicles were destroyed by crossfire, four armored vehicles were able to drive on, but were also destroyed by other units. Five armored vehicles, before reaching the main road, turned around on a dirt road and drove back. After the main battle, two armored vehicles tried to break through the ambush, shown at the end of the video, but were also destroyed.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mi2dltIU1VI

 

[Soldier35]

The first footage has been published, although this has not been officially confirmed, of the downing of what is believed to be the new Russian S-70 Okhotnik attack UAV. The S-70 Okhotnik drone was shot down, presumably, by a Russian Su-57 aircraft at close range in the skies over Gorlovka. After that, the aircraft turned around to avoid the Ukrainian air defense zone. Usually, the S-70 drone flies in tandem with the Su-57, but we also showed a flight in tandem with the Su-30. The drone fell in the Donetsk region near Konstantinovka. Unofficially, it was reported that a technical failure occurred and the S-70 Okhotnik drone lost control, after which it was decided to destroy it. The drone was a prototype.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMrhVIhg2FA

 

[Boiled_AnDa]

Archival footage of a unique battle between two Russian BTR-82A 810 Brigade of the Russian Marine Corps, with nineteen armored vehicles, the 82nd separate airborne assault brigade of the Ukrainian army. The video was filmed in the Kursk region, the 82nd assault brigade on light armored vehicles, tried to enter the rear of the Russian army. Two BTR-82As worked from an ambush, fire was conducted from 30-mm automatic cannons 2A72, armor-piercing ammunition. The positions of the BTRs and the direction of fire are shown in the video, it is partially shortened, the damaged equipment is shown at the end of the video. The official report on the battle is as follows. The Ukrainian column was moving in a composition of nineteen armored vehicles, 12 armored vehicles were able to enter the area of the settlement. Eight armored vehicles were destroyed by crossfire, four armored vehicles were able to drive on, but were also destroyed by other units. Five armored vehicles, before reaching the main road, turned around on a dirt road and drove back. After the main battle, two armored vehicles tried to break through the ambush, shown at the end of the video, but were also destroyed.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mi2dltIU1VI

The original is 13+ min, guess it happened in in 12th august time zone, BTR80 did post the full video in telegram .
But its really a carnage....
strangely Ukrainian convoy pushed without any prior racon or drone coverage..

 

[Vishnugupt]

If the drones are coming from Latvia and Estonia then they are already attacking Russia. Russia needs to go after them.

There are few incidents only not plenty. Similarly Russian missiles and drone also landed on NATO territory several times.

America and Russia has back channel communication perhaps they do not want to escalate.

Similarly Russia also after Poland and UK for nordstream pipeline but they didn't.

 

[Vishnugupt]

What difference does it make when. The pilot and the jet are subject to extradition from a neutral country. He did not carry out combat flights from their territory. Do you think they are not looking for a reason to accuse him of an international violation?

You even remember my original question?? I said Ukrainian jets using NATO bases. You said, where is the proof?? I gave you a proof.

Now you saying so what?? Then why are you even arguing like a shameless?? Just say, yes it is operating but so what?

I don’t remember arms deliveries to Russia from normal countries. Only from rogue states (Belarus, Iran, North Korea). Even Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan do not risk selling old Soviet weapons directly to Russia, because according to international law, you can only help the victim of aggression.

Did I asked you this??
By the way there no such international law so stop fooling others.

As for the drone. Watch the video from Yelabuga, how they get the remains of the drone.

First, these are single seater turboprop planes which is converted in drone by NATO ( Not by you).

Secondly Neither say drone launched from Ukraine nor these drones are under serial production

 

[Blademaster]

There are few incidents only not plenty. Similarly Russian missiles and drone also landed on NATO territory several times.

America and Russia has back channel communication perhaps they do not want to escalate.

Similarly Russia also after Poland and UK for nordstream pipeline but they didn't.

If America doesn’t want to escalate it would have shut down the drone attacks inside Russia and tell the Baltic States to pipe down and cool the rhetoric.

 

[Vishnugupt]

If America doesn’t want to escalate it would have shut down the drone attacks inside Russia and tell the Baltic States to pipe down and cool the rhetoric.

Do not want to escalate to become a full fledged NATO Russian war. Everyone happy if Ukrainian alone die.

Rhetorics the only thing Gl0b0h0m0s Liberandu-sickulars are champion of.

There are drone attacks on Russia in which origin of drone remain unknown. It is very easy to pass it as Ukrainian drone attack but reality do not match with Ukrainian claims.

 

[Akim]

You even remember my original question?? I said Ukrainian jets using NATO bases. You said, where is the proof?? I gave you a proof.
Now you saying so what?? Then why are you even arguing like a shameless?? Just say, yes it is operating but so what?



Did I asked you this??
By the way there no such international law so stop fooling others.



First, these are single seater turboprop planes which is converted in drone by NATO ( Not by you).

Secondly Neither say drone launched from Ukraine nor these drones are under serial production

All our transport aircraft are in Poland now, delivering weapons and ammunition there, but for some reason you're picking on this Su-27 that requested an emergency landing.


When a Russian transport ship was shot down by a Ukrainian sea drone and entered a Turkish port, is that considered NATO participation on Russia's side?
As for aggression, read Chapter 7 of the UN Charter.
I don't even want to comment on the drone. Before the war, Ukraine built many (hundreds a year) light aircraft and helicopters. Nothing prevents them from being converted into kamikaze drones.

 

[Akim]

View: https://x.com/Tendar/status/1842672077796773902
How slowly everything is done in democratic countries. Back in June, Sweden decided to supply these APCs. It's already October.
By the way, about armored vehicles. Here @Vishnugupt mentioned Ukrainian tank factories with venom in his voice, but even according to the statistics of destroyed Ukrainian military equipment, one can see a decrease in the share of Soviet-made equipment. Western (including Turkey) and Ukrainian-made armored vehicles have come to the forefront in operation.

 

[shade2]

View: https://x.com/Tendar/status/1842672077796773902
How slowly everything is done in democratic countries. Back in June, Sweden decided to supply these APCs. It's already October.
By the way, about armored vehicles. Here @Vishnugupt mentioned Ukrainian tank factories with venom in his voice, but even according to the statistics of destroyed Ukrainian military equipment, one can see a decrease in the share of Soviet-made equipment. Western (including Turkey) and Ukrainian-made armored vehicles have come to the forefront in operation.

They want Russia intact but with Putin gone which is why your Armed forces are being drip-fed equipment.
They do not care how many Ukranians of both civilian and military variants die to achieve this.
If they were serious the best equipment would have been rushed to Ukraine, but the dip feed continues as from Feb 2022

Ukraine has few units of Patriots, IRIS-T and plenty of MANPADs. But Russian are simply not taking any risk as there are plenty of cruise missile stocks to get job done.

There is basically nothing strategic target in Ukraine, including Zelensky nor do Akim's imaginary tanks factories. All Ukrainian airforce based in NATO bases in Romania and Poland.

Russian AD is undoubtedly world best. Ukrainian jets couldn't afford to fly above 1000 feets due to fear of R-37 from the air and SAMs on the ground. That's why Mighty Wonderwaffe F-16 chilling at NATO bases.
r.

US-made F-16 fighter jet crashes in Ukraine due to 'pilot error': Reports - Times of India

Europe News: NEW DELHI: A US-made F-16 fighter jet given to Ukraine crashed on August 26, resulting in the death of its pilot, Oleksiy Mes, who was known by the ca.

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Haha this reminded me of their F-16 "crash", in all likelihood it was shot down but they don't want to admit it, so now they are blaming the dead pilot who ofc cannot defend himself and "RuShEd TRaInInG", I wonder who was responsible for training the pilots?

 

[Vishnugupt]

All our transport aircraft are in Poland now, delivering weapons and ammunition there, but for some reason you're picking on this Su-27 that requested an emergency landing.

Hahaha... Transport aircraft for transport, obviously they have to land in other countries. But transport aircrafts are not armed but fighter jets are.

Picking Su-27 Because the question was about Ukrainian fighter jets are using NATO bases to hide.

When a Russian transport ship was shot down by a Ukrainian sea drone and entered a Turkish port, is that considered NATO participation on Russia's side?

No, Because Turkish government immediately disowned you and promised Russia that they will make sure the Rogue state Ukraine will not be allowed to use Turkey territory for attack.

As for aggression, read Chapter 7 of the UN Charter.

This is a literature for Gl0b0h0m0s Liberandu-sickulars not for me.

During Iraq war NATO was Aggressor and all your godly countries helped NATO.

NATO Serbian war was first example when America went against the UN and its charter.

I don't even want to comment on the drone. Before the war, Ukraine built many (hundreds a year) light aircraft and helicopters. Nothing prevents them from being converted into kamikaze drones.

There is big difference between Ukraine before the war and Ukraine today.
Ukraine is a totally dysfunctional state today. You are not manufacturing anything in Ukraine today.

Here @Vishnugupt mentioned Ukrainian tank factories with venom in his voice, but even according to the statistics of destroyed Ukrainian military equipment, one can see a decrease in the share of Soviet-made equipment. Western (including Turkey) and Ukrainian-made armored vehicles have come to the forefront in operation.

My point was, today Ukraine is manufacturing nothing. There is possibility 2S22 Bohdana being manufactured in NATO country and Ukraine has sold it's IP rights. Similarly all other Ukrainian technology has been looted by Europeans as well.

 

[Akim]

Hahaha... Transport aircraft for transport, obviously they have to land in other countries. But transport aircrafts are not armed but fighter jets are.

Picking Su-27 Because the question was about Ukrainian fighter jets are using NATO bases to hide.



No, Because Turkish government immediately disowned you and promised Russia that they will make sure the Rogue state Ukraine will not be allowed to use Turkey territory for attack.


This is a literature for Gl0b0h0m0s Liberandu-sickulars not for me.

During Iraq war NATO was Aggressor and all your godly countries helped NATO.

NATO Serbian war was first example when America went against the UN and its charter.



There is big difference between Ukraine before the war and Ukraine today.
Ukraine is a totally dysfunctional state today. You are not manufacturing anything in Ukraine today.



My point was, today Ukraine is manufacturing nothing. There is possibility 2S22 Bohdana being manufactured in NATO country and Ukraine has sold it's IP rights. Similarly all other Ukrainian technology has been looted by Europeans as well.

You wrote so much nonsense that I don't even want to refute it.
Showed a Su-27 in old camouflage (not digital). Just like 10 years ago, Russian media found a photo of a Ukrainian Mi-24 in UN colors and wrote a comment that it was bombing their proxies. I showed you a photo from March 1, 2022, where it flies away from Romania. Did you notice the weapons there?
Ukraine has a lot of military production, but it all "went underground". For example, Rheinmetall is preparing to start serial production of Lynx by the end of the year.
Ukrainian T-72 AMT mod. 2022 (in the foreground) and Czech T-72EA.

P.S. Apparently it is better seen from India.

 

[Akim]

They want Russia intact but with Putin gone which is why your Armed forces are being drip-fed equipment.
They do not care how many Ukranians of both civilian and military variants die to achieve this.
If they were serious the best equipment would have been rushed to Ukraine, but the dip feed continues as from Feb 2022

Maybe

 

[Satish Sharma Ji]

हमे तो अपनो ने मारा गेअरो मे कहा दम था


View: https://youtu.be/GNGdoRvrxBs?feature=shared

 

[Akim]

View: https://x.com/Osinttechnical/status/1842334781243085167
Another gift from Sweden.
I agreed with @shade2 that the collective West does everything with little desire.
More and more often, Western voices are heard that we need to resign ourselves and give up the occupied parts of Ukraine. It is not Western politicians who say this directly, but through influential media, with the help of various analyses.
But there is less and less enthusiasm inside the country. Everything is done slowly. Officials have started stealing more. And not from Western aid - it is well controlled. They steal state money.
For example: These Swedish boats. They have a Ukrainian analogue, the Centaur, but it was built at a shipyard that belongs to Poroshenko. Zelensky hates Poroshenko. How 3 boats were built before 2019 and there are no more orders. There is not a single Triton armored vehicle (from another of his enterprises), not a single automatic grenade launcher (UAG-40), mortar (82 and 120 mm), various machine guns, or Malyuk assault rifles in the state order. Civil volunteers buy all of this, but they are not able to order an assault boat. The state has other financial
Of course, almost all of the products have been replaced by other enterprises, but 300 is always more than 200.
I am very unhappy with Zelensky's political ambitions, but now he is our supreme commander-in-chief and he does not betray the interests of Ukraine.

 

[Corvus Splendens]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/TankPorn/comments/1fy4d3s/abrams_tank_from_ukraines_47th_mechanized_brigade/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

 

[craigs]

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/TankPorn/comments/1fy4d3s/abrams_tank_from_ukraines_47th_mechanized_brigade/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Holy shit the true representation of an American "Tank".

 

[craigs]

Do you know them personally?
I am also a resident of Donetsk, who was forced to leave in 2014.
Compare Severodonetsk (a combination of two words - North and Donetsk), which the Russians deliberately shelled, and Donetsk itself. Do you think the Ukrainian army did not have the opportunity to destroy this city, if such a task was set?

You seem to read Putin's mind all the time here. Do you know him personally? Does he come and whisper things in your ear?