Aero India 2025

Desi Tomahawk Brahmos

The best part about this weapon is that it can be fired from the UVLM launchers for BrahMos. This gives the Navy options to play around with the loadout of 8-16 UVLM/ capital ship.

LRLACM is a Defence Acquisition Council-approved, Acceptance of Necessity-sanctioned, Mission Mode Project. It is configured to launch from ground using mobile articulated launcher and also from frontline ships using universal vertical launch module system.
https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2072829

The only concern here is the cost/unit since a BrahMos-ER costs ~ $5 million/unit and has a range of ~ 900 km. I expect it to be less than the BrahMos since the ramjet engine is still imported from Russia and the LR-LACM uses the STFE Manik.

The Indian Army got DAC approval for 4000 crore worth of missiles with a planned acquisition of 1000 units. If the army buys 100 units then its ~ $4.6 million/unit and if it's 200 units then its $2.3 million/unit considering 1 USD = Rs. 86.

LRLACM will be used by all three services with the Indian Air Force and Army receiving AoN for procurement of the missile in August 2023 and February 2024 respectively. IAF will procure missiles worth about ₹10,000 crore once developed, while the Army will procure missiles worth ₹4,000 crore.
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-new...range-hypersonic-and-subsonic-naval-missiles/

1739386364150.webp
https://idrw.org/indian-army-to-begin-user-trials-of-nirbhay-cruise-missile/#:~:text=The Rocket Force is anticipated,get DMCA and Legal Notices.
 

I really hope they give hard function keys along the periphery of display. All touch screens for control are bad in cars - must be frustrating for pilots even more. @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR Do you guys all touch screens in cockpit? I replacing old clunky mechanical reading meters is all good but replacing essential h/w buttons also with soft touch in the name of decluttering - might be pleasing aesthetically but must be irksome operating them flying
 
I really hope they give hard function keys along the periphery of display. All touch screens for control are bad in cars - must be frustrating for pilots even more. @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR Do you guys all touch screens in cockpit? I replacing old clunky mechanical reading meters is all good but replacing essential h/w buttons also with soft touch in the name of decluttering - might be pleasing aesthetically but must be irksome operating them flying
No bro as a matter of fact in a glass cockpit without any touch screens we shouldnt ideally touch any screens..we use a pen to point any threat or indication.

We have two type of inputs..one is keypad MCDU and the second is FCU with direct flight commands like AP,speed,heading,altitude etc.

I must say the Airbus switches and button are really good quality and durable.
 
These are not EOTS or IRST or FLIR or any other high-tech mumbo jumbo; just a forward looking TV/IR camera that's used for actually flying the aircraft. Basically what the eyes of a pilot in a manned aircraft do during VFR flights.

You'll find it on all of the high end UAVs.
InCollage_20250214_211904221.webp
 
No bro as a matter of fact in a glass cockpit without any touch screens we shouldnt ideally touch any screens..we use a pen to point any threat or indication.

We have two type of inputs..one is keypad MCDU and the second is FCU with direct flight commands like AP,speed,heading,altitude etc.

I must say the Airbus switches and button are really good quality and durable.
Thanks bro for elucidating. I wonder how is all glass cockpit with touch screen for fighter pilots. must be irritating when they need to switch pages on screen quickly. Here from F 35 pilot

The rest of the cockpit is beautiful to look at – nothing analogue, all digital with about 10 actual switches in the cockpit. Notice I say beautiful to look at, not necessarily beautiful to interact with! In theory the all-glass display is great. It’s touchscreen, you can set it up to show pretty much anything you want in any layout you want. Take, for example, a fuel display. You can have it in a large window that shows you everything you could possibly want to know about the aircraft’s fuel system; the contents of each tank, which pumps are operating, fuel temperature, centre of gravity etc. Or you can shrink it into a smaller window that only shows more basic info. Or you don’t even display it at all because the Function Access Buttons (FAB) along the top of the display always has a small fuel section with the essential info visible at all times. That’s the beauty of the display – size and customisation. The drawback is in the complete lack of tactile response. It can be challenging to press the correct ‘button’ on the display whenever the jet is in motion as it is quite a bumpy ride at times. At present I am pressing the wrong part of the screen about 20% of the time in flight due to either mis-identification, or more commonly by my finger getting jostled around in turbulence or under G. One of the biggest drawbacks is that you can’t brace your hand against anything whilst typing – think how much easier it is to type on a smartphone with your thumbs versus trying to stab at a virtual keyboard on a large tablet with just your index finger.

Voice input is another feature of the jet, but not one I have found to be useful. It may work well on the ground in a test rig, but under G in flight it’s not something I have found to work consistently enough to rely on. I haven’t met anyone who uses it.

Having bashed the interface, the way this jet displays information to you is incredible. The sheer amount of situational awareness I gain from this aircraft and its displays is like nothing I’ve experienced before. The off-boresight helmet is much more accurate than legacy JHMCS systems and I find it clearer to read (although I still want a wide-angle HUD for flight and fight-critical data!). About the only thing missing from the whole cockpit is the lack of ‘feel’.
 
any CASA C-295 photos please
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top