- Joined
- Jul 2, 2024
- Messages
- 637
- Likes
- 2,784
Nothing against micromanagement when these changes cost in crores, but approval should be speedy.
Retractable IFR probe for MK2
View: https://x.com/ang3lkenny/status/1893212959993627096
View: https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1893237571817480201
The bottom placed sensor one is not EOTS. There is no EOTS but MAWS.What a sensor suite
View attachment 25929
Tejas MK2 will be the base on which all our AMCA's LRUs will be proven!What a sensor suite
View attachment 25929
Yes , I really couldn't get this part . What's the GoI doing sanctioning funds for an assembly jig irrespective its cost ?!
One would have thought this is part of the development costs of the Mk-2 sanctioned to ADA & supervised by the MoD.
Is it beyond the scope of the budgeted amount which is to say is it an additional cost or is the development of the Mk-2 being monitored at the highest level ?
I think side DAS is not that important. Of course it butchers overall view but a missile can't approach from side and attempt to get a hit. It would always be in a straight line to plane and hence the MAWS would always pick them up.No EOTS.
Side DAS missing.![]()
It seems you are confusing b/w DAS & MAWS. DAS is an arrangement of MAWS & fixed IRST functionsI think side DAS is not that important. Of course it butchers overall view but a missile can't approach from side and attempt to get a hit. It would always be in a straight line to plane and hence the MAWS would always pick them up.