- Joined
- Jun 30, 2024
- Messages
- 76
- Likes
- 404
A thread to discuss Tejas Mark 2 'MWF'
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lesson learned.As long as Kaveri doesn't get developed and India is dependent in any small way to the US, all Tejas variants will keep being held hostage to US machinations.
Without Kaveri:
Best case, US keeps drip feeding us and we can't match China's pace and it hurts us if a conflict arises.
Worst case, they hang us out to dry and we concede, and have to be dependent on the US; we make grave concessions in other sectors for said engines and still get hurt in a conflict.
For that houthiya govt needs to open the purse strings and provide a flood of funds to the Kaveri project, buy or develop atleast a couple of FTBs, hire the best brains from IITs IISc etc,...and top project mgmt with measurable milestones and deliverables. Else Unkil will continue to squeeze us by the two small round things near the mooladhara chakraAs long as Kaveri doesn't get developed and India is dependent in any small way to the US, all Tejas variants will keep being held hostage to US machinations.
If Dod has finalised 2 delta-canards MWF & TEDBF then i guess DoD engineers have learned a lot from mixed avionics of Su-30MKI & N-LCA with levcons. They might have studied Rafale also.With a state of urgency prevailing regarding fighter deliveries (Mk1A delayed, MMRCA 2.0 several years away from deliveries starting), will the inclusion of canards in the Mk2 design risk slowing things down? I presume that writing the FCS for a frame with canards is something of a step into the unknown.
so production would start 29-30 timeline imo still its very late
straight answer noIs it possible to make 83 + 97 = 180 Mk1A before that?
I am afraid Mk2 production will be further than that.
Is it possible to make 83 + 97 = 180 Mk1A before that?
I am afraid Mk2 production will be further than that.