AHCA (Advanced Heavy Combat Aircraft) concept, 5/5.5/6gen? Su-30MKI replacement? TEDBF 2.0?

look dude...right now we r "actually" working on 4.5 nd 5 genration....which result "may be" fruitful untill 2035. after that do u really think in next 5-10 years, we r ready to make a 6 genration aircraft??? which will replace our su 30 mki. if yes, than excellent. if no, than we hv to replace su 30 mki with a 5 or 5.5 genration fighter.
1:- my assessment based on our recent capabilities, not based on other countries capabilities nd which technology they r using. so yes a 5-5.5 genration medium weight single engine fighter jet make more sense to replace our su 30 mki fleet. instead "any 6 genration aircraft". yeah we will remainb10-20 years behind than other countries in aircraft segment. but it will far better than today, when we r 30-40 year behind in fighter aircraft manufacturing. coz we r building a 4 genration (tejas) fighter now, which other countries made 30-40 year before. definitely in some areas, like aesa radar, RWR, bvr missile, jamming pods etc we r making current level of technology.
2:- if we imported any other countries 6 genration fighter or get engine etc....than that is different topic to discuss.
I hope by now your doubts are clear that it is more about catching up with global tech resulting in a heavy jet by 6gen characteristics which would coincidentally & automatically be the next heavy jet after Su-30MKI, unless GoI goes for Su-57 in big numbers.
It is a misconception actually for many people that a new jet is intentionally made just to replace another jet.
How many types of jets AF+Navy will get just depends on tech level in era to era, industrial ecosystem, geopolitics, geography, funding, will power to compete in global market.
I mentioned Su-30MKI replacement only bcoz airframe design commonality with Su-33. Russia has not indicated what will replace it.
India has the opportunity now to do what Capitaist West simply can't do, what China is planning.... field 5gen jets in big numbers & doing R&D on 6gen. Our DoD is working on DEW pod, new sensors & components. We just need a JV VCE engine, custom weapons & proper fighter UCAVs. 15 years is long time also & passes fast also if misused.
ADA needs to stop its inear approach. Although it has sub-teams working on different products but they are wrongly linked in a chain rather than in parallel.
Our nation had many financial scams, tax theft, etc, hence funding issues.
If we act sincerely then we won't need to import or colaborate on 6gen jet like FCAS or 1-engine NGAD, etc. Otherwise history will keep repeating itself in vicious circle.
 
They have not produced an optimised/upgraded AMCA infographic & static model & still after 100-120 KN engine. So "Initiated plan" (not RFI/RFP) could mean them talking over a tea break in canteen. :tea:🫖☕ :rotflmao::roflb:
Anyways, let's be optimistic & wait till this year end.⏳⏰
Iaf official Said, 6th gen will began when amca prototype enters testing.
So 2030+.
 
Iaf official Said, 6th gen will began when amca prototype enters testing.
So 2030+.
That means it is not initiated except on tea table & the tweet is fake. :LOL:
But IAF is operator, not designer. At max they can provide test pilots. And going forward either they should not dictate our requierement based on Pakistan, or ADA should be expanded who will initiate projects as per global advancements & held accountable.
Anyways, bcoz every jet is different & every component design of 6gen is not brand new. So a lot of soft work like CAD, CFD, wind tunnel tests of many test articles can take place. A small floor of tech team, with PCs & CAD/CFD S/w + Mach-3 WT doesn't cost much that our economy can't afford.🤷‍♂️
 
2030
They should still start working on al31 class engine or improve al 31 engine from learning of kaveri
For 6gen, AL-31 is obsolete now. We should negotiate few pieces for AL-51 (108/167 KN dry/wet) or 41 just for R&D purpose, ToT is not required if our JV targets proper thrust engine.
 
For 6gen, AL-31 is obsolete now. We should negotiate few pieces for AL-51 (108/167 KN dry/wet) or 41 just for R&D purpose, ToT is not required if our JV targets proper thrust engine.
Al 31 is still obselete for our su 30 mki
We should work for engine in same class for our su 30 fleet and maybe future 6 gen aircraft or maybe getting engine from Russia is also good deal expensive but good deal
 
That means it is not initiated except on tea table & the tweet is fake. :LOL:
But IAF is operator, not designer. At max they can provide test pilots. And going forward either they should not dictate our requierement based on Pakistan, or ADA should be expanded who will initiate projects as per global advancements & held accountable.
Anyways, bcoz every jet is different & every component design of 6gen is not brand new. So a lot of soft work like CAD, CFD, wind tunnel tests of many test articles can take place. A small floor of tech team, with PCs & CAD/CFD S/w + Mach-3 WT doesn't cost much that our economy can't afford.🤷‍♂️
Drdo was pushing for amca from 2009 and did internal preliminary work till 2018 when government finally approved the amca project because we pulled back from fgfa.
So can expect drdo to already start doing some preliminary internal work in basic design and role based on requirements of today and future for 6th gen.
But IAF basically said they will show interest when amca prototype starts testing.

So after 2030+ 6th program can officially start by the government.
 
Al 31 is still obselete for our su 30 mki
We should work for engine in same class for our su 30 fleet and maybe future 6 gen aircraft or maybe getting engine from Russia is also good deal expensive but good deal
If Su-30MKI needs engine upgrade then IMO AL-41 should be put in, used by Su-35.
But even AL-51 won't satisfy 6gen twin engine jet unless weapons & fuel capacity are restricted to 5gen jet quantity level. I stated it only for R&D. They'll need AL-61 or 71 for their 6gen. :LOL:
Our JV has to target a VCE type engine not regular current type, that too 200 KN wet thrust in worst case scenario, ideally 250-300 KN wet thrust as per some basic maths.:eric:
 
If Su-30MKI needs engine upgrade then IMO AL-41 should be put in, used by Su-35.
But even AL-51 won't satisfy 6gen twin engine jet unless weapons & fuel capacity are restricted to 5gen jet quantity level. I stated it only for R&D. They'll need AL-61 or 71 for their 6gen. :LOL:
Our JV has to target a VCE type engine not regular current type, that too 200 KN wet thrust in worst case scenario, ideally 250-300 KN wet thrust as per some basic maths.:eric:
These are "ideal" dreams.
We will need to "compromise" with reality.

Right now gtre also has plans for 140kn engine in future, using tecg developed for amca's engined

But no plans for VCE.

Right now our jet engine tech has just reached early 4th gen in terms of materials.
Even in that we lack lots of infrastructure.
For example, we don't have a 20kton press to created the single peace core ring that goes in Kaveri or russian al31 we domestically produce.
So Kaveri uses imported components too.
 
Drdo was pushing for amca from 2009 and did internal preliminary work till 2018 when government finally approved the amca project because we pulled back from fgfa.
So can expect drdo to already start doing some preliminary internal work in basic design and role based on requirements of today and future for 6th gen.
But IAF basically said they will show interest when amca prototype starts testing.

So after 2030+ 6th program can officially start by the government.

We're already very late + 5 years more late when China & USA revealed new jets, Russia can reveal something new any day, EU prototypes are being made i think.
Still our Dod are overconfidently sleeping with eyes wide open. GoI/MoD said this year will be of Defence reforms. So they need to show some work done to public to win back confidence or there will be all types of fallout - political, industrial, economical, strategic, etc.
 
We're already very late + 5 years more late when China & USA revealed new jets, Russia can reveal something new any day, EU prototypes are being made i think.
Still our Dod are overconfidently sleeping with eyes wide open. GoI/MoD said this year will be of Defence reforms. So they need to show some work done to public to win back confidence or there will be all types of fallout - political, industrial, economical, strategic, etc.
The only thing 6th gen in chinese prototypes shown seems like more stealthy design( but lost basic fighter level manurablity) especially against vhf(lack of vertical surface)
And potential for lots of electrical power.

Eventually future versions of f35, j20 etc can be upgraded with everything 6th gen is envisioned to be except the things I mentioned above( design and electrical power).

So if your worried about tech, we can develop it with amca, and can bring it to similar standards tech wise.
It won't be able to do same role as those larger "so called 6th gen" doesn't mean it will be outdated In that battle field.
Like f16 and f15 are considered same gen, one is light-medium Ish fighter other is a heavy fighter( more range,endurance, payload, more electrical power, more powerful avionics)


So the question would be would be will we need a heavy command Jet with lots of electrical power in future or can be compensate for it with other systems?

Like France seems to be going for a relatively smaller jet for their 6th gen( bigger than rafale but somewhat smaller than flanker) due to their carrier requirement.
 
These are "ideal" dreams.
We will need to "compromise" with reality.

Right now gtre also has plans for 140kn engine in future, using tecg developed for amca's engined

But no plans for VCE.

Right now our jet engine tech has just reached early 4th gen in terms of materials.
Even in that we lack lots of infrastructure.
For example, we don't have a 20kton press to created the single peace core ring that goes in Kaveri or russian al31 we domestically produce.
So Kaveri uses imported components too.
Engineers dream 1st then think & talk seriously then start making. It is the actual real technical truth by simple maths.
The real reality is possibility of war, possibly multi-front.
Students go to foreign university for 4 year graduation or 2 year PG & after passing they make most of it.
But we're talking about next 15 years of industrial JV R&D by 2040. Babies born today will become high school teens, that's a long time.
Whatever you think we lack proves how long we've been sleeping & now we're begging ToT. So all those missing things have to be funded & facilitated, people hired, etc, some shortcuts, some imports to fast track, otherwise be ready to say bye bye to Arunachal Pradesh & keep dreaming to take back PoK. If regime change occurs in our nation anytime after 5 years then they might happily give away more territories in case of war rather than making self-reliant military & economy.

So as EU is working on their 6gen VCE, so we should learn it & make for ourselves. Otherwise it is like failing in foreign university for 15 years.:eric::facepalm4::playball::smash::frusty:
I said it earlier also that JV doesn't have to target only 1 engine type. But if a 200 KN+ class VCE is made then it can power AMCA also like F-35 & our 6gen.

The only thing 6th gen in chinese prototypes shown seems like more stealthy design( but lost basic fighter level manurablity) especially against vhf(lack of vertical surface)
And potential for lots of electrical power.
You started going in circle.
Our AMCA is also not fully 5gen projected yet in static models & infographics.
Do we expect foreign power to disclose everything upfront? Do we expect us to disclose our secrets?
Foreign platforms won't improve over time? You think their jets are cola cans?
Who wants to overconfidently underestimate others?

Eventually future versions of f35, j20 etc can be upgraded with everything 6th gen is envisioned to be except the things I mentioned above( design and electrical power).
Really? Then why are they making 6gen jets? After long discussions also you're forgetting everything.

So if your worried about tech, we can develop it with amca, and can bring it to similar standards tech wise.
It won't be able to do same role as those larger "so called 6th gen" doesn't mean it will be outdated In that battle field.
Like f16 and f15 are considered same gen, one is light-medium Ish fighter other is a heavy fighter( more range,endurance, payload, more electrical power, more powerful avionics)
I never said AMCA will be useless, it'll be a stepping stone, but it can never be 6gen, nor can any 5gen jet. They can be MLUed to 5.5gen but not be made 6gen due to airframe limits.
More weapons capacity, more electricity & redundancy leads to bigger jets.

So the question would be would be will we need a heavy command Jet with lots of electrical power in future or can be compensate for it with other systems?
Giving commands to UCAVs can be done with secured tablet, like "nuclear football", but nothing can compensate a critical platform like a proper combat jet. The high electrical power is for DEW.

Like France seems to be going for a relatively smaller jet for their 6th gen( bigger than rafale but somewhat smaller than flanker) due to their carrier requirement.
Every maker nation won't do things same way.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top