It'll be a delightful sight seeing our new stealth fighter smoking like a coal fired chimney as it breaks the sound barrier.
View attachment 18107
IAF has the chance of a lifetime to reengine the Mig-29s with GE414s. That'll be a sight
IAF has the chance of a lifetime to reengine the Mig-29s with GE414s. That'll be a sight
- no i funny have the CAD, plus you can't ask for copyrights on someone else's design
Even if we make it it'll be heavy at shit.. even the existing one is far overweight for the thrust is generates.
I didn't understand part of your sentence.
I'm not asking you to claim copyright over his work.
> Who are "THEY"? ADA? IAF? DRDO?
You mean only 1 of them will be implemented?
Public doesn't have to wait for things which are obvious or indispensable.
When you have woredon it then why don't you take some guess?
I think the new approach is to spread the tanks across the fuselage, wrapping around the other components, rather than blocks.
The sole reality is a single stabilizer. Not impossible that it is fitted with nternal bay(s).
fluidic vectoring need a higher minimum speed than classical flaps. But it is clearly a futur nice technology.Koi baat nahi beta, galti hum sabse hoti hai, bas usse seekh lena chahiye.
Bcoz this is an internal part & their customers are qualified & understand the technical vocabulary.
But here most members are from various background incl. non-tech, just enthusiasts for time pass.
Let's not waste time over timeline when we all got the point.
For West the next product is 6gen
For us the next product is 5genin same timeline
Yes i know that obviously hence I said "basically", not "exactly", as both things use pressurised air only, one from the exhaust, other from mid-engine stages. Thrust is a generic tech-term. Specifically we can say exhaust thrust, & then bleed-air thrust like used in Harrier's RR engine.
Anyways, the point is to understand the technology & feasibility.
Honestly & obviously i cannot know all the Aeronautical Engineering terminologies, but the Coanda effect is already used since previous century on flaps & slats of civil & military jets for takeoff, landing, low speed, roll, pitch. During roll, when one side slat, flap, aeleron moves then the Coanda effect works on 1 side & the air resistance/friction works on other side. Some transport aircrafts use jet engine mounted on top of wing to increase lift. The Slats use the natural air flow, not the engine bleed air
View attachment 17671
View attachment 17669
View attachment 17668
If R&D is happening since 14yrs then we can't say that it is a distant future tech, may be 6gen might use it if its efficiency is good. May be the next stealth jet after B-21 might use it. Time will tell.
View attachment 17680
Then there is something called "Fluid TVC"
View attachment 17699
Some domestic websites are reporting that IIT Kanpur & ADA are working on Fluid TVC for Ghatak UAV.
View attachment 17700
But i wonder if Coanda effect / Fluid TVC / Bleed-air can give high agility, high AoA, tight turns, Cobra, etc kind of maneuvers. Some of these require afterburner.
Who are "THEY"? ADA? IAF? DRDO?
> Do THEY mean that Tejas Mk2 will be more radical or better than AMCA Mk2??
> By "noticeably better" i meant showcasing the already existing 5gen characteristics seen TODAY on F-22, F-35, Su-57, J-20. There's nothing radical about things seen TODAY to be implemented after 5-10yrs on AMCA.
> AMCA Mk2 is being quoted as 5.5gen. But nobody is clearly talking what'll be added to 5gen but not completely to be 6gen.
> Hence in the era of upcoming 6gen in West & 5gen in 3rd world nations, there is nothing radical about any MLUed 4gen jet around the world.
> And if they want to increase version # with such minor changes then we'll be seeing AMCA Mk10 before retirement.
You mean only 1 of them will be implemented?
As we all know that F-35's EOTS is called TARGETTING System bcoz it has LD (Laser Designator), not just IR camera.
While IRST has become a function rather than dedicated H/w. The F-35's EOTS also performs the IRST function exactly like Su-3X's OLS by sweeping in azimuth, clear in the videos.
But for the upper hemisphere the F-35's DAS is also multi-functional. It performs MAWS as well as IRST by DIP (Digital Image Processing).
Some CADs show IRST+DAS
Public doesn't have to wait for things which are obvious or indispensable.
When you have woredon it then why don't you take some guess?
Whether he does or not, he's lagging behind other artists whose CADs seem to be more complete & hence have been showcased more by domestic & foreign websites & Youtubers.
For example this one showing DAS, side radar, IRST, EOTS:
I think the new approach is to spread the tanks across the fuselage, wrapping around the other components, rather than blocks.
Well, that's your choice obviously but you have opportunity to be more accurate & popular.
> Changes like? Could you please be more informative?
No, no, please don't reply like this, it looks disrespectful. Everybody knows that a regular citizen can't take it up to ADA, DRDO, HAL, etc. Public can challenge a govt. decision online & offline in various ways, but there are rarely any talk show where qualified techies are challenging DoD products precisely. At most people criticie the delays, scams, cost, etc, that too politically rather than technically.
I'm low IQ average guy
but defiinitely qualified Sr. IT engineer, capable of contributing something useful superficially, not deeply. Honestly, I luckily 
got chance to do B.E. in Comp.Tech. bcoz i was good in computer programming since school days, but i never did well with PCM & subjects based on them.
, scored high in GATE exam & worked on LCA.
He wasn't good in programming
while i have certificates & photos of winning inter-college competitions.
He wasn't creative with weapons, aircrafts but just good with crunching PCM numericals. But as per our education system the only way of entry into DRDO, HAL, NAL, etc is high grades. Just creativity is not enough.
Ok but it is not a boxy block but wrapped around other components. AFAIK that's bcoz big volume of liquid also has inertia to affect motion of the carrying vehicle, hence the solution is to compartmentalize & spread the tanks.
Well, that's your choice obviously but you have opportunity to be more accurate & popular.
Whatever you guys have done so far is for fun & time pass only, right? Unless you guys are part of DoD or in contract with them.
I just asked for a labeled diagram. I'm sure while making the CAD you guys went through cutaway diagrams on Google, then what's the problem in abelling your own work?
Enthusiasts may refer to a more complete CAD.
Comparing for AMCA, this is how much F-16 has changed in 40years by blockwise development.
You are right.
I know increasing production is not as simple as Dassault building another assembly line. But all the sub-components like that Thales EO systems and all that have to be increased production. Not only that there is also sub-components of sub-components themselves as I assume all those optics are not made by Thales themselves but some optics company.
They have a strike every Tuesday in France. We need licensed production here. Dassault is swamped with orders already because we wasted 3 years dilly dallying.
It was a joke my Guy, we've already discussed this Rafale saga in great details
...including the exact subcomponent part you're highlighting
We place an order worth $40bn in 2016 for 200 Rafale including naval variants. Most of the airframe is made in India (not a big deal as Tata has already proven this with AH-64s) and components like guns and radars would come directly from various French OEMs, bypassing the production issue at Dassault. We'd get ToT for engines and those would be manufactured in-house. The know-how would help us in Kaveri and subsequently speed up the process of Tejas Mk-2 and AMCA.
