Chinese Economy Watch

BYD ATTO 3
View attachment 7671

Performance Acceleration 0 - 100 km/h 7.3 sec Top Speed 160 km/h Electric Range 330 km Total Power 150 kW (204 PS) Total Torque 310 Nm Drive Front

Weight Unladen (EU) 1825 kg Gross Vehicle Weight (GVWR) 2160 k

View attachment 7670

Maximum speed: 255 km/h / 155 mph

Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 3.7 s

Deceleration 100-0 km/h:
31.6 m
TOP SPEED 250 KPH (155 MPH) HORSEPOWER 360 BHP TORQUE 485 NM (360 LB/FT) WEIGHT 695


Electric cars weight more thus

View attachment 7669

A latest study has claimed that electric vehicles (EV) may release more particulate matter from brakes and tyres as compared to modern gas-powered cars. According the study by Emission Analytics, the emission could be 1,850 times greater.




Mineral demand for heavy batteries will grow rapidly. The International Energy Agency estimated that electric cars use 173kg more minerals such as lithium, nickel and copper than petrol cars (when ignoring steel and aluminium). The data company Benchmark Mineral Intelligence forecasts global demand for lithium, the key battery metal, will quadruple to 3m tonnes in 2030, outstripping supply.



This is the reason i felt boring to debate with you, you don't own any car, you don't even know currently, there is a thing called PHEV, combined strenghs with battery and combustion engnine, and BYD makes the best of it.



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oUy5H_w4yQ


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PW6u-inDpas


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UI_DPeNu0_o
 

Can India’s economy thrive without China’s help?​



... ...


https://www.ft.com/content/5a2b4491-5687-4b11-872d-a4f51121bbb2

At a testing facility near the town of Cheyyar in India’s southern Tamil Nadu state, a new generation of Mahindra Group vehicles are being put through their paces.The carmaker’s latest flagship sport utility vehicles whizz around a high-speed racetrack with sheer banking slopes, muddy off-road courses, and potholed lanes designed to simulate Indian roads. At the company’s nearby research centre, electric vehicle prototypes due to be released early next year are being fine tuned and equipped with the latest digital technology.Mahindra’s futuristic fleet attests not only to a rising automotive sector in India, but to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Atmanirbhar Bharat Abhiyaan, or “Self-reliant India”, campaign.

... ...

LIVE: India Reopens Doors For Chinese Investors Amid Border Standoff​


Is this Chinese economy thread or india?
 
This is the reason i felt boring to debate with you, you don't own any car, you don't even know currently, there is a thing called PHEV, combined strenghs with battery and combustion engnine, and BYD makes the best of it.



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oUy5H_w4yQ


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PW6u-inDpas


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UI_DPeNu0_o

you are just propaganda, Any person should be critic of his own country.

The example I put it is ICE cars are lighter something whcih is true, a heavier mass requieres more thrust.

Thus even Vuhl 5 is a race car and a collectible car; it is 3 times lighter and 160% much faster.

Add the report says tires pollute regardless is ICE or EV but heavier pollutes much more PM (particulate matter)

You do not going to tell me your fantasies, Chirey and Omoda are selling less in Mexico, BYD is a failure in sales in Mexico.

In Mexico Ford builds EVs and I know the factory since my sister lives a few minutes from there.
1724713744966.png
The electric car will fail, because it does not solve pollution, I am for Electric buses or even Electric trains, but cars are not a solution, since batteries pollute a lot and mass production of them is highly subsidised...


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_wG8kD312E


1724713837101.png

Battery swapping means more pollution since more batteries produced more pollution
 
you are just propaganda, Any person should be criteof his own country.

The example I put it is ICE cars are lighter something whcih is true, a heavier mass requieres more thrust.

Thus even Vuhl 5 is a race car and a collectible car; it is 3 times lighter and 160% much faster.

Add the report says tires pollute regardless is ICE or EV but heavier pollutes much more PM (particulate matter)

You do not going to tell me your fantasies, Chirey and Omoda are selling less in Mexico, BYD is a failure in sales in Mexico.

In Mexico Ford builds EVs and I know the factory since my sister lives a few minutes from there.
View attachment 7730
The electric car will fail, because it does not solve pollution, I am for Electric buses or even Electric trains, but cars are not a solution, since batteries pollute a lot and mass production of them is highly subsidised...


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_wG8kD312E


View attachment 7731

Battery swapping means more pollution since more batteries produced more pollution


You as jobless guy and don't have car, don't know how PHEV works. U only need 50USD of fuel u can drive 1000 - 2000km long range.

Weak government like Mexico, lack of power grid planning and construction, will be very suitable for BYD DM-i tech.


View: https://x.com/tphuang/status/1777641206521983390?t=kcF7bVj8EMKScJODnK8A-w&s=19



1st half 2024, BYD export destination.

1000068433.jpg
 
Last edited:
You as jobless guy and don't have car, don't know how PHEV works. U only need 50USD of fuel u can drive 1000 - 2000km long range.

Weak government like Mexico, lack of power grid planning and construction, will be very suitable for BYD DM-i tech.


View: https://x.com/tphuang/status/1777641206521983390?t=kcF7bVj8EMKScJODnK8A-w&s=19



1st half 2024, BYD export destination.

View attachment 7733

If Nepal is buying more EVs than Germany I've reasons to suspect the data. It's either the data or some racket whereby those EVs eventually find their way into India.
 
You as jobless guy and don't have car, don't know how PHEV works. U only need 50USD of fuel u can drive 1000 - 2000km long range.

Weak government like Mexico, lack of power grid planning and construction, will be very suitable for BYD DM-i tech.


View: https://x.com/tphuang/status/1777641206521983390?t=kcF7bVj8EMKScJODnK8A-w&s=19



1st half 2024, BYD export destination.

View attachment 7733

The green transition is pushing electric vehicles upon the American public as it is believed that they are less greenhouse gas intensive than gasoline vehicles. Electric vehicles, however, require lithium-ion batteries that have issues regarding greenhouse gas emissions during the mining and processing of the raw materials needed and the disposal of the batteries at the end of their life cycle. As more and more electric vehicles are sold, the problems inherent to mining and disposal increase. The graph below shows the huge increase expected in global EV battery demand. In the United States, electric vehicles are being forced on the public through proposed vehicle standards and purchase incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act, also known as the climate bill.


The production of lithium-ion batteries that power electric vehicles results in more carbon dioxide emissions than the production of gasoline-powered cars and their disposal at the end of their life cycle is a growing environmental concern as more and more electric vehicles populate the world’s roads. About 40 percent of the climate impact from the production of lithium-ion batteries comes from the mining and processing of the minerals needed. Mining and refining of battery materials, and manufacturing of the cells, modules and battery packs requires significant amounts of energy which generate greenhouse gases emissions. China, which dominates the world’s EV battery supply chain, gets almost 60 percent of its electricity from coal—a greenhouse gas-intensive fuel. According to the Wall Street Journal, lithium-ion battery mining and production are worse for the climate than the production of fossil fuel vehicle batteries. Production of the average lithium-ion battery uses three times more cumulative energy demand (CED) compared to a generic battery.


The disposal of the batteries is also a climate threat. If the battery ends up in a landfill, its cells can release toxins, including heavy metals that can leak into the soil and groundwater. A study from Australia found that 98.3 percent of lithium-ion batteries end up in landfills, which increases the likelihood of landfill fires that can burn for years. One landfill in the Pacific Northwest was reported to have had 124 fires between June 2017 and December 2020 due to lithium-ion batteries. Fires are becoming increasingly more common, with 21 fires reported on the site in 2018, increasing to 47 by 2020.

Recycling of lithium-ion batteries is being pushed by governments due to the environmental waste issues associated with them and the growing demand for batteries as more and more electric vehicles are sold. Only about 5 percent of the world’s lithium batteries are recycled compared to 99 percent of lead car batteries recycled in the United States. Recycling lithium batteries, however, can be hazardous. Cutting too deep into a cell or in the wrong place can result in it short-circuiting, combusting, and releasing toxic fumes. Because batteries differ widely in chemistry and construction, it is difficult to create efficient recycling systems. And because the cells are often held together with tough glues that make them difficult to take apart, it is often cheaper for battery makers to buy newly mined metals than to use recycled materials, even with rapidly increasing prices.

Governments are beginning to require some level of recycling, however. In 2018, China, which has the largest EV market and lithium-ion battery production, imposed rules aimed at promoting the reuse of EV battery components. Last year, the European Union passed rules for battery recycling that requires a certain percentage of recycled materials to be used in the manufacturing of new batteries.

Composition of Lithium Ion Batteries

A lithium-ion battery is composed of cells, which contain the active materials, a battery management system, and a pack, which is the structure in which the cells are mounted. Aluminum is important for the pack component because of its light weight but it is a very energy-intensive material, representing 17 percent of the battery’s carbon footprint. About 40 percent of the carbon footprint of the battery comes from the mining, conversion and refining step of the active materials of the cells where nickel, manganese, cobalt and lithium are processed into cathode powder. Actual cell production is the second most energy-demanding activity and represents 20 percent of the carbon footprint due to the energy used during the manufacturing process.

Issues with Mining of Battery Raw Materials

Two types of mining commonly required to extract minerals for batteries are open-pit mining and brine extraction. One of the major ways to extract lithium called brine extraction uses a large amount of water that is pumped into salt flats, bringing saltwater containing minerals to the surface. Once the water evaporates, lithium is filtered out of the mixture. But, the water-intensive process has the potential to contaminate the water supply. More than half the earth’s lithium supply is located in an area called the Lithium Triangle, spanning the Andean Mountain sections of Argentina, Bolivia and Chile. The area is one of the driest places on the globe, and lithium mining consumes as much as 65 percent of the region’s water. Any expansion of demand will place more pressure on water issues.

Also needed for electric vehicles is cobalt, the majority of which is mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The mining of cobalt produces hazardous byproducts that can toxify the environment. Cobalt mine sites often contain sulfur, which generate sulfuric acid when exposed to air and water that infiltrates rivers, streams and aquatic life. Child labor is also being used in the Congo to mine cobalt, and about 80 percent of the industrial cobalt mines in the DRC are owned or financed by Chinese companies.

Conclusion

Electric vehicle batteries require mining natural resources, processing them, and manufacturing the materials into batteries, which is energy intensive—3 times more energy intensive than the batteries in internal combustion vehicles. Further, when a battery is at the end of its life cycle, it is usually disposed as e-waste in landfills that can result in hazardous compounds leaching into the soil and can cause large fires, which are extremely difficult to control due to the large amount of combustible waste that they are mixed with. Recycling the batteries is being pursued by governments, but it is expensive
as there is no standardization in battery design and they are difficult to dismantle. Like many things related to the government-imposed green transition, it appears that much of the foresight that typically accompanies market-driven revolutions is actually hindsight, with consumers left to bear the brunt of unwise decisions and edicts.


Personal attacks are common with you but honesty is lacking with you. when you grow and you stop suckling CCP lies and wean your self of lies you will see reality
 
Last edited:
If Nepal is buying more EVs than Germany I've reasons to suspect the data. It's either the data or some racket whereby those EVs eventually find their way into India.
in poor countries car are cheaper thus profits are lower, they have less recharging stations, and there is less car penetration, Chinese car makers are bankrupt and electric car brands specially from China are not making money, fantasy man does not understand the reality, the americans understand their markets are the most profitable because cars are more expensive in the USA.
 
Last edited:
in poor countries car are cheaper thus profits are lower, they have less recharging stations, and there is less car penetration, Chinese car makers are bankrupt and electric car brands specially from China are not making money, fantasy man does not understand the reality, the americans undersatand their markets is the most profitable because cars are more expensive
The reason these Chinese EVs are so cheap is because of heavy subsidies from the CCP. The CCP's sole aim is to capture the entire EV market & shut down ICE car makers which are essentially Western Japanese & Korean cos. The CCP also thinks the rest of the world are full of fools & can't see through this game .

Let the market for ICE automobiles in China which as of now is dominated by western car makers along with the Japanese & Koreans be replaced by EV completely which will happen in a few years & the Chinese will find out just how the West retaliates.
 
You as jobless guy and don't have car, don't know how PHEV works. U only need 50USD of fuel u can drive 1000 - 2000km long range.

Weak government like Mexico, lack of power grid planning and construction, will be very suitable for BYD DM-i tech.


View: https://x.com/tphuang/status/1777641206521983390?t=kcF7bVj8EMKScJODnK8A-w&s=19



1st half 2024, BYD export destination.

View attachment 7733

fake news byd never has sold 14000 cars in Mexico

14000 cars were sold in 2023 but tose include Tesla and Ford

1724721882146.png

 
If Nepalharbours unsng morimport froNepal is n Germany I've reasons to suspect the data. It's either the data or some racket whereby those EVs eventually find their way into India.

1. Germany import lots of cars through Nederland and Belgium harbours under EU.

2. 100% oil of Nepal need to be import from Inida. meanwhile it has surplus hydropower, and it even sells to India. This is why Nepal is good for EV, 2023 it sold 5000 Chinese EVs.


View: https://youtu.be/wJ7Z8kWv7jQ?si=rAsUTPUYyqvl_tcD
 
1. Germany import lots of cars through Nederland and Belgium harbours under EU.

2. 100% oil of Nepal need to be import from Inida. meanwhile it has surplus hydropower, and it even sells to India. This is why Nepal is good for EV, 2023 it sold 5000 Chinese EVs.


View: https://youtu.be/wJ7Z8kWv7jQ?si=rAsUTPUYyqvl_tcD

I'm going strictly by the info meme you've put up. If you're telling me BYD the so called number 1 Chinese EV OEM has sold more EVs in Nepal than it has to Germany I find it difficult to digest assuming the data put out is genuine.

What's their selling hydropower to India or importing oil from India got to do with importing BYD EVs ? Have you checked Nepal's economy.

Here you go



They don't have FOREX reserves for basic needs & you're telling us how EVs will be beneficial for them .
 
come to going strictly by the info meme you've put up. If you're telling me BYD the so called number 1 Chinese EV OEM has sold more EVs in Nepal than it has to Germany I find it difficult to digest assuming the data put out is genuine.

What's their selling hydropower to India or importing oil from India got to do with importing BYD EVs ? Have you checked Nepal's economy.

Here you go



They don't have FOREX reserves for basic needs & you're telling us how EVs will be beneficial for them .

Not all the EU harbours are good at roll-roll ship import, German itself needs harbour to export cars. Most EV import of EU came from Belgium, that's why Germany data looks low on customs data.



Customs data show that Nepal imported 7,931 units of EVs from China, accounting for 69 percent of the total EV imports in the first 11 months of the current fiscal year.


Ur link



This is how they just drive through the gate of border and come to Nepal market. I can see most of them are BYD.

1000068469.jpg

1000068471.jpg

Nepal has surplus electricity (hydro) it would be used for EV than importing oil from India.

It will make less oil and legacy car transportation from India, will save lots of energy, let's make world a better place!
 
Last edited:
The reason these Chinese EVs are so cheap is because of heavy subsidies from the CCP. The CCP's sole aim is to capture the entire EV market & shut down ICE car makers which are essentially Western Japanese & Korean cos. The CCP also thinks the rest of the world are full of fools & can't see through this game .

Let the market for ICE automobiles in China which as of now is dominated by western car makers along with the Japanese & Koreans be replaced by EV completely which will happen in a few years & the Chinese will find out just how the West retaliates.
I agree, nice to have you back

With this range of products, BYD managed to sell 1,123 units, including 350 electric cars sold through Liverpool, which opened the brand's first showroom in June 2023 in the parking lot of the Perisur shopping center.


Fantasy man can not admit reality BYD has not sell 14000 cars in Mexico his statisticsa are fake
 
Not all the EU harbours are good at roll-roll ship import, German itself needs harbour to export cars. Most EV import of EU came from Belgium, that's why Germany data looks low on customs data.



Customs data show that Nepal imported 7,931 units of EVs from China, accounting for 69 percent of the total EV imports in the first 11 months of the current fiscal year.


Ur link



This is how they just drive through the gate of border and come to Nepal market. I can see most of them are BYD.

View attachment 7741

View attachment 7742

Nepal has surplus electricity (hydro) it would be used for EV than importing oil from India.

It will make less oil and legacy car transportation from India, will save lots of energy, let's make world a better place!
check your fake news

BYD never has sold 14000 cars in Mexico


The best-selling car brands in Mexico in the first half of 2024
Nissan: 17.2%
Chevrolet: 13.2%
Volkswagen: 9.0%
Toyota: 8.2%
KIA: 7.2%
Mazda: 6.3%
Ford: 3.6%
Hyundai: 3.5%
MG: 3.5%
Suzuki: 3.0%
Source: INEGI. Administrative Registry of the Light Vehicle Automotive Industry. Publication date: 07/03/2024

In the middle of 2024, Nissan continues to hold the national leadership by reporting more than 21 thousand units sold in June 2024, with a 17.2% share of the national total by registering 121 thousand units in the entire first half of the year. It is followed by General Motors, which reaches a monthly average of 16 thousand sales and reaches 99 thousand in the first half of the year.

Volkswagen is in third place with more than 63 thousand units sold between January and June. Toyota recorded its sales record so far this year in June with 10,438 units and reaching 58 thousand in the semester. KIA continues to hold onto its fifth position in the market with 50,000 units in the first half of the year. However, in June it lost its fifth monthly position to Mazda, which recorded its best year-to-date sales of 9,067 units and 44,000 in the first half of the year, occupying sixth place and closing ranks with the Korean brand.

Chrysler (Stellantis) is down -13% compared to the first half of the previous year and reached 29,985 total units from January to date in June; followed by Ford Motor with 25,791 units in the semester and Hyundai with just over 25,008 sales.

MG Motor returned to selling more than 4,000 units in June and remained in tenth place, but in the cumulative total for the semester it records a decrease of -6.42% compared to 2023, reaching 24,000 units sold. This is explained because the main competition of the brand owned by the Chinese group SAIC are other Chinese OEMs such as Chirey, Great Wall Motors, among others. Consumers of Western and Japanese brands seem to be more loyal, while those consumers who are choosing Chinese brands do not yet seem to have a fully defined preference between them.

Speaking of other Chinese brands, Chirey Motor remains in fourteenth place as of June with 2,460 units sold, including the Omoda sub-brand. In the first half of the year, Chirey has sold a total of 11,450 units, a significant drop of -39.09% compared to 2023. Exhibiting the phenomenon of cannibalization among Chinese brands.

Great Wall Motor reported a total of 1,301 units sold, an entry that brings them to a total of 6,546 units in 2024 and more than 7 thousand units since their entry into the country last October.

In the premium segment, BMW continues to lead with 1,672 units in June and 7,331 in the entire semester, followed by Mercedes Benz with 1,127 units in June and 6,188 in the semester; and finally Audi with 886 sales in June and 5,841 units in the semester.

 
Last edited:



Canada has announced a significant shift in its trade policy by aligning with the United States to impose a 100% tariff on electric vehicles (EVs) imported from China. This measure, designed to counter China’s perceived market manipulation and overcapacity, will take effect on October 1, 2024. Additionally, Canada will impose a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports from China, escalating trade tensions between the two nations.

"I think we all know that China is not playing by the same rules. What is important about this is we're doing it in alignment and in parallel with other economies around the world," said Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister, Canada.

The announcement follows a 30-day public consultation period in Canada focused on Chinese EVs and related products, reflecting similar actions by the United States and the European Union. Ottawa's decision comes on the heels of US President Joe Biden's move to quadruple tariffs on Chinese EVs to 100% and double duties on semiconductors and solar cells to 50%. The United States has also introduced new 25% tariffs on strategic goods, including lithium-ion batteries and steel. The European Union has imposed tariffs of up to 37.6% on Chinese EV imports.

Canada’s decision is driven by its strategic goal of becoming a significant player in the global EV supply chain. Domestic pressure has also influenced Canada’s stance against China’s trade practices.

"We feel vindicated and motivated. Let's now get to the business of defending our market with the best of Canadian innovation and resolve," said Flavio Volpe, President, Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association.

The tariffs are expected to have a notable impact on the Canadian automotive industry. Data from Canada’s largest port in Vancouver reveals that imports of automobiles from China surged by 460% in 2023, primarily due to Tesla’s decision to ship EVs manufactured in Shanghai to the Canadian market. This increase in Chinese EV imports has raised concerns among Canadian industry stakeholders about market saturation and the long-term viability of domestic manufacturers.

The implementation of US tariffs on Chinese goods, including EVs, has been delayed until September 2024, with potential adjustments still under consideration.

 
Canada has announced a significant shift in its trade policy by aligning with the United States to impose a 100% tariff on electric vehicles (EVs) imported from China. This measure, designed to counter China’s perceived market manipulation and overcapacity, will take effect on October 1, 2024. Additionally, Canada will impose a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports from China, escalating trade tensions between the two nations.

"I think we all know that China is not playing by the same rules. What is important about this is we're doing it in alignment and in parallel with other economies around the world," said Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister, Canada.

The announcement follows a 30-day public consultation period in Canada focused on Chinese EVs and related products, reflecting similar actions by the United States and the European Union. Ottawa's decision comes on the heels of US President Joe Biden's move to quadruple tariffs on Chinese EVs to 100% and double duties on semiconductors and solar cells to 50%. The United States has also introduced new 25% tariffs on strategic goods, including lithium-ion batteries and steel. The European Union has imposed tariffs of up to 37.6% on Chinese EV imports.

Canada’s decision is driven by its strategic goal of becoming a significant player in the global EV supply chain. Domestic pressure has also influenced Canada’s stance against China’s trade practices.

"We feel vindicated and motivated. Let's now get to the business of defending our market with the best of Canadian innovation and resolve," said Flavio Volpe, President, Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association.

The tariffs are expected to have a notable impact on the Canadian automotive industry. Data from Canada’s largest port in Vancouver reveals that imports of automobiles from China surged by 460% in 2023, primarily due to Tesla’s decision to ship EVs manufactured in Shanghai to the Canadian market. This increase in Chinese EV imports has raised concerns among Canadian industry stakeholders about market saturation and the long-term viability of domestic manufacturers.

The implementation of US tariffs on Chinese goods, including EVs, has been delayed until September 2024, with potential adjustments still under consideration.



View: https://youtu.be/MOreJAyfUUU?si=XfUO62NILq52MQ2q
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top