CI/CT Operations

Since Independence we have never fought any high casualty war.. None of our wars haven't crossed 4000 dead..
I don't think India can handle 10,000 dead in 5 months.. We are pretty cowardly for a country of 1.4 billion

But we can take 10,000 dead soldiers in 25 years..

None of the wars that India fought since independence lasted long enough to result in high casualties.

Besides having large casualties is not a symbol of bravado, but rather a lack of requisite skills, professionalism and technology. The US lost only about 2400 soldiers in the nearly two decades of Afghan war and only 4500 soldiers in Iraq invasion and post-invasion insurgencies. Contrast that with the Russian Invasion of Afghanistan, the Russians lost anywhere between 150,000 to 700,000 soldiers in just two years alone.
 
None of the wars that India fought since independence lasted long enough to result in high casualties.

Besides having large casualties is not a symbol of bravado, but rather a lack of requisite skills, professionalism and technology. The US lost only about 2400 soldiers in the nearly two decades of Afghan war and only 4500 soldiers in Iraq invasion and post-invasion insurgencies. Contrast that with the Russian Invasion of Afghanistan, the Russians lost anywhere between 150,000 to 700,000 soldiers in just two years alone.
American were fighting dudes with sandals and AK and not an regular forces
Meanwhile Russian and ukrainean are both regular conventional armies who have thier own airforce , armour , artillery , and other means
So no doubt casualty of Russian and ukrainean are higher by seeing intensity of war
 
Few days ago trts hideout was busted visual
In thease hide out they can't be detected by drones or thermals you have to send your forces on foot in which high chance trts will spot you first and will fire first that gives them advantage
There is always a technology. Issue is priority, if we hv jungles than we must concentrate on developing technologies. Why can't army ask drdo to work on these things.
 
None of the wars that India fought since independence lasted long enough to result in high casualties.

Besides having large casualties is not a symbol of bravado, but rather a lack of requisite skills, professionalism and technology. The US lost only about 2400 soldiers in the nearly two decades of Afghan war and only 4500 soldiers in Iraq invasion and post-invasion insurgencies. Contrast that with the Russian Invasion of Afghanistan, the Russians lost anywhere between 150,000 to 700,000 soldiers in just two years alone.

Apples and oranges. The only comparison that US can make is the first Gulf War and that is truly a masterpiece but keep in mind that US forces were only in actual combat for 60 days and Iraq had no help whatsoever. And the Russians did have that kind of performance in the first 60 days of war in the Russian Ukraine conflict. They overtook an area the size of Iraq in less than 2-3 weeks and Ukraine would have fallen if it wasn't for that massive overwhelming support by NATO.

So be careful with that comparison.
 
There is always a technology. Issue is priority, if we hv jungles than we must concentrate on developing technologies. Why can't army ask drdo to work on these things.
I dont know what kind of tech could have been used because as i said even thermal would have failed to detect them
 
when your leaders have this mindset , failure will be a surety. i don't think best army's round the globe will have this attitude. they will pour in everything to get success unlike ours just send in people to die again and again and again.

this is our standing in world, they are using such tech to find lost hikers and we can't use in military operations , this is not even a joke , it's betrayal against a country.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HLdiJAZNTM&ab_channel=TeledyneFLIR


This video is misleading. Looking through forest canopy using FLIR is not really effective at all. This is a myth that infrared cameras can look through anything, in reality they really struggle if direct LoS is not present or just obstructed by shallow foilage.

Refer to this reply I posted, ex-USAF soldier used IdeaForge switch type of drone to demostrate anti-drone tactics and how easy it is to escape drone if you are in a dense jungle.

👇


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdy0uxaJl0E

Explains how easy it is to evade drones with thermal cameras if you are in jungle environment.

TLDR -
  • Drones are deadly in open spaces. Even finding minimum cover like stone formations and bushes will help you hide your IR signatures.
  • Thermal camouflage will help in hiding > 50% of your heat signature. Even a simple cover like wool blanket also helps massively.
  • The trainer displays evading small thermal camera drones with light forest cover (temperate forest with low vegetation density), but with thick cover like found in J&K it will be practically useless.

Explains why our drone ops has not yielded any results.





What I meant was we have gained advantage over terrorists, and we are at the point where we have started to get upper hand against terrorists.



What's up with these days. In every encounter 3-5 killed, even Kashmiri local journalists mention those numbers, then Army confirms only 1-2.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top